Recent orders
Criticism Paper
This paper is a collaborative paper applying lessons learned in the class
pertaining to criticism. Early on in the course, you will learn about the differences between
structuralist, post-structuralist, formalist, ideological, psychoanalytical, deconstructionist,
visual culture criticism, phenomenologist and feminist criticism (96-102). You will be
assigned to a group, where you each choose one of the types of criticism, then write
about the same piece of art (through the lens of a type of criticism). Each critic in the
group should have a unique voice; no repeats (in other words, two formalist critics will not
be accepted. Everyone needs to have a different criticism). You need to decide as a group
beforehand who is doing what, and you need to do it together. This semester, the college
is evaluating teamwork, and thus it will take coordination on your part to successfully
complete the paper (because you have to figure out who is doing what). Look for a shell
attached to the assignment link for the paper in eCampus. The paper should be 3-5 pages in length at least (1,000-1200 words). Although everyone will be choosing their own
criticism, someone needs to organize the criticisms as one piece, thus one of you in the
group needs to put it together for the others.
You will receive a team grade and an individual grade for this paper. If someone in the
group fails to write about the work or to participate, group members should alert me to
this immediately. Any individual not participating in this activity will receive a zero, and
such behavior will be taken into account concerning the team score. This paper will be
compiled in APA style format, including all reference material both cited in your paper,
and with a references/ works cited page. If you are not familiar with the APA style, you
may familiarize yourself online through the links provided below. They provide a clear and
thorough explanation of the APA style specifics you will be required to meet. For example,
each of you will be writing your own criticism (of choice), and thus such needs its APA
header.
Change Management Concept Paper. Concept Application and Change Report.
Writing Change Management Concept Paper.
Writing Concept Application and Change Report.
Instructions
General formatting guidelines for the Concept Application and Change report. It serves as an extension to
the detailed rubric available via our course Moodle site.
Maximum page limit 15 pages – as always, APA 6th edition applies; 1.5 line spacing is ok here, 12 font. If you
believe it will add value to your report feel free to use appendixes – that said, be economical as often in
business writing, “less is more”. Always think of the audience for your report, a manager.
General Suggested Format:
Executive statement
Part A: Concept development/ Concept Alignment:
Tell the manager what the tool/model/concept is. How it works! How it should be managed.
How does this concept improve organizational performance? Tell the executive/manager why this concept is
important to the organization (i.e.: why an executive should spend resources implementing the concept you
want the company to move forward with?).
What other variables in the organization need to align so as to amplify, support and enhance the
effectiveness of your concept? Considering a diagnostic model here can be helpful to consider what
variables align with your concept or should/need to align with your concept… how will your concept impact
the system?
Part B: Implementation:
Framework/Change Principle Alignment:
What change approach will you take ie: which change model will you use? Then, apply the change model so
as to facilitate the cementing of your concept in the organization. What must change in the organization?
Make sure this section is applied not academic in scope. Ultimately, this section should deal with the
resistance that is likely to happen when a new process/system etc. is introduced to an organization.
Conclusions: Not needed
Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
Assignment: Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders affect the structure and function of the GI tract.
Many of these disorders often have similar symptoms, such as abdominal pain, cramping,
constipation, nausea, bloating, and fatigue. Since multiple disorders can be tied to the same symptoms, it is important for advanced practice nurses to carefully evaluate patients and
prescribe a treatment that targets the cause rather than the symptom.
Once the underlying cause is identified, an appropriate drug therapy plan can be recommended
based on medical history and individual patient factors. In this Assignment, you examine a case
study of a patient who presents with symptoms of a possible GI/hepatobiliary disorder, and you
design an appropriate drug therapy plan.
To Prepare
Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment
Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.
Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder
related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of
a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological
disorder.
Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs
currently prescribed.
By Day 7 of Week 4
Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:
Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide
examples.