Recent orders

Game Warden Ethics

As you have learned throughout this course, the criminal justice field demands moral conduct
from all participants. In your Final Paper, you will create a set of core, ethical beliefs and moral
requirements for people engaged in your line of work, or your intended line of work. Drawing
from Chapters 5 and 15 in your textbook, along with the eight additional sources you research to
support your opinions, formulate your paper based solely upon scholarly sources. In your paper,
Compile a comprehensive job description for your line of work or intended line of work;
Identify all of the stakeholders related to the position;
Describe at least three practical work scenarios where ethical decision making and moral action
must be taken in the position;
Evaluate the pros and cons of two ethical theories applicable to the work scenarios you chose;
Create your own code of ethics for the position and the foundational sources for your code;

Design a best-practices checklist for your chosen position; and
Propose how your code of ethics will positively impact all stakeholders to the position.
The Final Paper
Must be eight double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external
site.).
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least eight scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style

Business Management: Decision-Making Processes

Requirements:
Decision-making is part of everyday life, some decisions are easier to make than others and it is
the role of managers to give consideration to information that assists the decisions that need to
be made. Understanding how you make decisions will enable you to think about the information
that you will need to support you in making decisions.
Question:
Consider a time where you have had to make a decision, or a number of decisions, that have
had a major impact on your life. Drawing upon this, identify, assess and evaluate your personal decision-making style and skills. Your work must include examples and theory to support and
justify your assessment of your personal decision making style and skills. Within it you should:
1. Identify your personal decision making skills and style, supported with relevant academic
theory and reinforced with personal examples of your decision making approach in practice.
2. Acknowledge through the assessment and evaluation you present, which skills and styles
were successful and which hindered your decision making; with justification as to why based
upon and supported by academic theory.
3. Articulate a plan of how you might alter your approach to making decisions in the future,
having identified, and assessed your personal decision- making skills and style with respect to
academic decision-making theory.
Consideration required to undertake the assignment.
You may for example refer to your decision making surrounding deciding to come to study at The
University of X. When you are looking back at this example you will need to evaluate how you
undertook this decision. In the process of doing this you should assess whether you adopted a
good approach to making this decision and whether anything within your personal decision
making style could hinder you in the future when making decisions. Having considered these
challenges, you need to outline what you might do differently and recognise any points that may
erode your decision making process. All aspects of your analysis (the identification of your
decision making style, the evaluation of your decision making style and your plan for altering
your approach to making future major decisions) must be supported throughout with reference to academic theory.
Use theory and examples to demonstrate the points that you are discussing, ensuring you
reference accurately using the Harvard Method.

Comparing FAA 14 CFR Part 145 and CASR Part 145

CASR Part 145 and 14 CFR Part 145 set out the requirements that have to be met by an
Australian and a US civil aircraft maintenance organization respectively, in order for the company
to be granted Part 145 approval status. Although both sets of regulations serve the same
purpose, there are structural differences.
Identify and explain the key differences between the CASA and FAA Part 145 regulatory
frameworks.
Briefly explain how an Australian Part 145 company, based in Australia, would obtain approvals
from the FAA to act as an FAA-approved repair station.