Organization Behavior

Organization BehaviorName:

Institution:

Date:

Organization BehaviorQ.1

One of the key traits of leadership is integrity.integrity entails being truthful and honest even though the picture portrayed by telling the truth is hideous. Ethics, on the other hand, can be described as basic standards of deciding what’s wrong or right. When identifying wrong ethics, one needs to ask what laws are being broken by doing a particular action?.

Hence we can understand an ethical dilemma as discords between two decisions where one will alter the other. For a state to be presented with a moral dilemma, three contexts must be in place. The main player in an ethical dilemma is the person involved who has to choose what decision to make, which makes it the second condition and finally, law and agency codes by the government which state course of action to be taken by social workers in case of an incident like child abuse (DiFranks, 2008).as a leader it’s, therefore, essential to have integrity and acceptable ethical standards.

In this model set, one creates a situation where a sports manager can create a decision in case of a dilemma.managers are faced with decision making on a daily basis. Hence, decisions and ethics can produce negative or positive standards in the social team corporation.

Q.2

Decisions made unethically can be as a result of a lack of education or training pointed on ethical decision making. Daly 2006 asserts that good choices and acts can produce tremendous results in the safety and socialization of staff. To get to make the right decision, scholars and professionals have thoughtfully developed stages of decision-making models in how the brain makes judgments and decisions. Since ethical dilemmas cannot be avoided it is then advisable to have a developed attitude before getting into a final point of decision making. Having ethical dilemmas is essential to calculating one’s values.

Q.4

If diversity can be adequately managed, it can be an asset (Perz 2005). By including diversity in workplaces, companies have shown great potential in that it creates a great workforce. CA can improve efforts in the variety by;-Evaluation of workmates on diversity

Upraise all cultural and religious practices

Give a platform to air the voice of each person

Open discussions on social equality

Approve multiple languages at work

Give room for ideas from every one

Combine diverse persons work force

Take everyone’s preferences separately

Uphold anti-discrimination

Take everyone’s issues personal

Q.5

These are based on general job satisfaction, motivation, and job growth satisfaction. Some of the groups include Finance, Human Resource, and marketing.

Commonly known as the two-factor theory, Herzberg argues that factors can influence motivation at a workplace. He described motivators as things that encourage employees to work harder. The other aspect is hygiene, which gives them a conducive environment not to motivate them but help them work properly. Dartey-Baah & Amoako examines how the application of the two-factor theory improves work at the workplace. Generally, workers will tend not to be motivated if the working conditions are not conducive and lack motivation.

References

DiFranks, N. N. (2008). Social workers and the NASW Code of Ethics: Belief, behavior, disjuncture. Social Work, 53(2), 167-176.

Daly, J. (2006). A MIXED METHODS APPROACH TO THE ETHICAL GOVERNANCE OF AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL SPORTING ORGANISATIONS. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 36(2).

Perz, S. G. (2005). The importance of household asset diversity for livelihood diversity and welfare among small farm colonists in the Amazon. Journal of Development Studies, 41(7), 1193-1220.

Dartey-Baah, K., & Amoako, G. K. (2011). Application of Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory in assessing and understanding employee motivation at work: a Ghanaian Perspective. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 1-8.