To The Last Man By Jeff Shaara, Book Review

To The Last Man By Jeff Shaara, Book Review

Basing on the revolution in America, plus the civil unrests, Jeff epitomizes a classic narrative of the experiences in America during the World War I. As a matter of fact, he tells the story from the viewpoint of real figures in history, departing from the sophisticated nature of diplomacy an engaging politics to the aircraft romance and trench battlefield horrors. John J giving directives to all forces of America within France and was supposed to ready his army for a fresh nature of war while at the same time resisting the efforts of the British and the French to suck up his soldiers into their exhausted torn units.

American Raoul and his German counterpart Manfred fly ancient aircraft into the battlefield air that brings around new dying techniques. In Roscoe Temple within the United States, Marine soldiers battle with bayonet and rifles in the blood and mud of Argonne Forest and Belleau Wood. These characters together with other real life subordinate cast give a shockingly graphic display of the folly and total war brutality. Jeff narration is sporadically mechanical but then his elucidation of personal combat within the air and the group slaughter on the battlefield are gripping, vivid and stark. He also provides thrilling figures of generals and politicians whose decisions and strategies did cost millions of lives and left the continent of Europe as a disgruntled wasteland.

Perceived from some distance, the western front Campaigns from 1914 to 1918 seem merciless, consuming up millions of lives daily in a fruitless conflict with no moral rationalization. It is crucial to note that the soldiers and politicians who kick started these campaigns together with the soldiers who fought in them were not machines. Jeff showcases the powerful human warrior side. He centers on the historical king pings experiences, together with John the American General.

Despite the fact that the story is narrated from an American viewpoint, in provides sufficient attention to aspirations and the attitudes of both normal and eminent German icons. In times when the characters used by Jeff are not actively involved in battle action, they take part in military babbles. The audiences get no real sense of generation destructive misery that this wars massive and mechanized killing caused. We only have an uncomforting cozy military soldier’s regurgitation of the joyous times when America triumphs.

Book Review of the Illusion of Victory by Thomas Fleming

Within this comprehensive historical tale, Fleming accomplishes nothing other than a sweeping revision of our World War I experiences. He showcases the way in which the French and the British confused Wilson into Believing that the war was beneficial as won, thus it would not be necessary to deploy American troops abroad. He elucidates an agitated president giving several speeches proclaiming the ideals of America while promoting spying and acts of treason that caused imprisonment of critics in federal prisons. He also gives a traumatic narration of the way in which cronies tried their best to transform the Expeditionary Force of America to a gun fodder within the western front. Comprehensively researched and spectacularly narrated, the Illusion of victory provides sufficient evidence to the president’s farsighted opinions powers together with a simple deterrent narration regarding the consequences of adopting them in a war prone world.

The fact that close to hundred thousand lost their lives in America during the World War I is not that fatal as opposed to the Russians and the Germans who lost close to two million persons while the British lost Nine hundred thousand people and lastly the French lose over one million four hundred thousand people. Fleming has made sure that his audiences discover the way in which America was taken to war even after president Wilson vowed to keep America out. After what is treated by many people as one on the best speeches by presidents ever, Wilson did persuade many parts of the country that Americas entry to war was crucial for various reasons, the main one was sour hatred for the Germans.

The case in which president Wilson had believe that he could join the war and still prevent the American soldiers from stepping into Europe enables the audience to perceive the idealistic perception of a head of state who usually found himself at trouble with pragmatism. His thoughts of designing the peace treaty and factored in his plans for another league of nations after Americas perceived short participation in the war is more prudence of his lose of grip to pragmatism.

The author leaves aside no detail in his narration regarding the Americas entry, battles, and training in the most horrific war. The procedure of reconciliation after the peace agreement was to many the best surprise, with both France and Great Britain yearning for revenge and destructions that led to the catastrophic Versailles treaty. Though some allies are of the idea of expansion of kingdoms, there is a continued enmity to Germany by Great Britain while millions of German citizens die from hunger. Audiences are left in questioning themselves on whether the World War II could have been prevented if amends had been made to make the Versailles treaty less punitive. Fleming gives his viewpoint regarding the president’s irresponsible hubris with the rather obsessed allegiance to his wife. The writing style of Fleming seems to me a bit insightful though thrilling. His studies regarding the culture and periods enable the audience to experience a distinct period in the history of America.

The main point on contest is the degree to which the people of America surrendered their lives, liberty and health. As per the author, a peace treaty would create a fresh world order. Democracy together with personal determination would triumph while the League of Nations would eradicate war. The peace treaty forced cruel terms to Germans, in spite of the fact that the German leadership agreed to a ceasefire on the foundation of Fleming’s fourteen points. Together with the guilt confession of the battle was reparation to would be solved in later periods which simply meant that the economy of Germany would be left at the leniency of the victors until they were satisfied.

There was also massive loss of oilfields to the poles while the French detachment of the Rhineland, Upper Silesia and Saar from the Reich. The peace agreement to some extent symbolized great victory for dynasty building. In a debate between the Italian and British diplomats regarding the League of Nations responsibilities, one issue was that a mandate must have the wishes and consent of the people. President Wilson is brought out as dictatorial leaders whom problems solutions were that the universe must at all time have him to spearhead it.

Despite the fact that he was struck by stroke which left him crippled and non functional for a while, he was pushing for re election by the democrats for presidency in nineteen twenty. President Wilson can be said with no doubt that he was obsessed with his own greed, but was not more than a persuasive vendor of speech with no substance. As the author illustrates he brought disgrace to his own nation plus the world. The author showcases a remarkable command of the enormous literature of World War I. I cannot also forget to criticize the author for promoting Hugo to nobility. World War I was the workforce of the universe not international labor force and also there is a misspelling on Nicolson Harold last name.

Bibliography

Jeff, Shaara. To the last man : a novel of the First World War. New York : Ballantine Books, 2004.

Thomas, J. Fleming. The illusion of victory : America in World War I. New York : Basic Books, 2004.