Recent orders

A Rose for Emily Analysis

Author

Tutor

Course

Date

Introduction

The importance of literature cannot be gainsaid as far as the intellectual health of the society in the contemporary world is concerned. Literature has been used as a guide to the society, depicting the evils encompassed in a society, as well as outlining the heroic acts of hypothetical role models, all in an effort to encourage, discourage or demystify certain characteristics in the society. In most cases, the characters, who may be villains or heroes embody the characteristics against or for which the author is arguing. These, however, may be masked in other less desirable characteristics. This is the case for Miss Emily in the story “A Rose for Emily”. As much as there are some characteristics of Miss Emily that may be deemed inappropriate, it is worth noting that she typifies the Southern Gothic Heroine.

Gothic fiction refers to a genre of literature that incorporates elements of romance, as well as horror. Miss Emily is in various ways a heroine of the southern gothic especially considering the many things that she did that were thought of as against the will, aspirations and expectations of the society.

The story, narrated via the point of view of a third person outlines the life of Miss Emily, whose funeral is taking place. Evidently, Ms. Emily was a mystery to the town’s citizen as the narrator states that no one has seen the inside of the lady’s house for almost a decade. In essence, the people of this village or town are crowding in this place so as to have a glimpse of the house, simply out of curiosity. The narrator explains that the deceased (Ms. Emily) was grandeur or a chip of the old block in the contemporary world. However, there are some things that set her apart from the other people living in the society. This is especially considering or having in mind that the story is set in a chauvinist society where all people are against the things that she does.

One of the things that set Ms. Emily apart from others as a heroine of the tragic tale is her opposition to the societal views after the death of her father. Two years after her father’s death, neighbors had complained about a foul smell. Law enforcers decided that they would sneak in to the house at night and sprinkle lime. However, Ms. Emily emerges at the window as they are leaving (Faulkner 76). The narrator outlines that this happened just when people were beginning to be sorry for her. The people had in a way become resentful of the Griersons for being too high-handed. When the ladies had gone to call on Emily after her father died, she lied that he was not dead. She only allowed her father to be buried after being threatened with the law and the possibility of application of force. This is seen as standing against the aspirations of the society, which especially revolves around the will of the men in that society. It is worth noting that the key conclusion was that she was merely clinging to the things that she had been robbed of especially pertaining to a married life as her father had not allowed her suitors close to her.

In addition, the sexuality of Miss Emily is threatening to the people in this town. It was used as an embodiment of female sexuality, which according to the imagination of males provided women with incredible power over men, as well as power exclusive of the influence of males. As Margie Burns states, the house was identified with Emily and females in general. The phrases such as coquettish decay and “heavily lightsome” anthropomorphize it and model it into an eyesore just like Emily and suggesting a veiled and threatening sexuality in the two edifices (Faulkner, 187). The sexuality of Miss Emily is outlined in artistic depiction, as well as correlating suppression.

It is also worth noting that the narrator describes Miss Emily as an idol. As much as Miss Emily has committed a foul crime, she is not viewed as a criminal, rather she is a victim of circumstances (Roberts, 65). He father had kept her under restriction, and it is commendable that she outgrows these rules and even goes ahead to date Homer. This is a way of struggling and rebelling against the circumstances that have been imposed on her by the society and especially the men embodied by her father. Scholars note that the envisioning of Miss Emily by the narrator (townspeople) as an idol is a validation of the roles that they have assigned to themselves as providers and protectors. In addition, placing her on the pedestal eliminates the need for them to accept the implications pertaining to the acknowledgement of her humanity, as well as subsequent sexuality. This tendency, however, is broken when she defies her father, the society and the law officers. This is bound to symbolize the breaking of chains by the womenfolk against the domination and definition by men (Roberts, 43).

In addition, the concept of being a heroine may be examined through the evidence and crucial nature of the relic concept. As much as the community would like the readers to see Miss Emily as a horrible murderer, it is unimaginable that she was ever exposed to positive and admirable examples on the manner in which she should live and take part in healthy relationships (Roberts, 56). This is especially considering the restrictions within which the community, as well as her father expected her to function. Pursuance of Homer Barron is the only action that this lady has executed as she only does the things that are expected of her by the society and father. The community thought that Miss Emily would bring their own healing, as she would patch the past to the future and preserve the way of life that every other member has been indoctrinated to preserve. This plan, however, backfires when this woman evolves into a woman who incorporates desires, as well as her will as to act without having to ask for permission from anybody. Emily, therefore, is a representation and demonstration of the subjugation that females or women who live in the post-confederate south experience, in their day to day life. As much as the book does not give a clear and viable plan for the modification of this aspect, it uses the character of Miss Emily as a way of insisting or laying emphasis on the reevaluation of the chauvinism and status quo present in the book (Roberts, 34).

In conclusion, as much as she Miss Emily may have a despicable past, she is an embodiment of the traits that are admirable for a heroine in southern gothic. Emily stands against the law enforces, the society and her farther so as to assert the place of women in society.

Works cited

Roberts, Diane. Faulkner and Southern Womanhood. Athens, Georgia: U of Georgia Press, 1994. Print

Faulkner, William. “A Rose for Miss Emily.” The Seagull Reader. Ed. Joseph Kelly.

New York: Norton, 2001. 73-83.

The story being analyzed is the second summit between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump

Subject

Students Name

Institution of Affiliation

Date

The story being analyzed is the second summit between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump. The two leaders met in Hanoi, Vietnam and the primary purpose of the meeting was to decide on the fate of nuclear weapon. The two articles covering the news is BBC News with the heading “Trump and Kim in Hanoi: Your need-to-know guide” while the second article is by the Aljazeera with the title “Trump-Kim summit 2.0: What you need to know”.

Description

The two articles are long, they cover a lot of information, and that’s why they are long. The pieces are visible. They are at the front page with the heading written in bold. They are the main stories, and therefore they have to be on the first page. Being written in bold implies that the headlines are a piece of major news and are written in bold to attract or catch the eyes of the reader. The likes and shares are not visible for the BBC article while the Aljazeera has no icon to share the news. Various that can be identified to be key for the news has dominated the two articles. Some of the keywords include Kim Jong Un, the North Korean president, Donald Trump, the US president and the Hanoi in Vietnam as the location of the summit have been intensely used. Other words that have been used in the two articles are the nuclear weapons, which is the main reason for the summit, Singapore, which is the location for the first meeting as well as peace have been repeated severally in the texts; therefore, they are key to the news. Both of the articles have explained the reasons for the summit and as well provided a background for the first meeting held in Singapore, and therefore, the context of the background in the two articles is good enough.

Analysis

The United States and North Korea has been in misunderstandings for quite some times, and the two nations seem to almost engage in war in the battle for supremacy. Each of the nations wants the other to back off, but none will adhere to that. Nuclear weapon is the main reason as to why the meetings are conducted so that war can be evaded between the two nation. Peace, as well as good international relations, are key to economic as well as political development of a country and therefore when countries try to show dominance, their economy may be significantly affected. The United States has been seen as a superpower for a long time, but the ability of North Korea to launch nuclear weapons targeting the United States have made it seem a battle for North Korea to become a superpower by defeating the United States. The battle is more of a cold war, as North Korea has been violating previous warnings of not testing its nuclear weapons and as well stop making more weapons.

The story is relevant in various aspects as it is an issue that can affect the whole globe. World War I and II started in almost the same way. The cold war that came after the world Wars was as a result of two blocks fearing the supremacy of the other, the nations’ hiding their activities from the other hence making the other suspicious. The same thing is happening in the case between the United States and North Korea. The US being a superpower is afraid of what North Korea is capable of and therefore keeps a close eye on the nation while North Korea does the same to the US. The story thus is of historical significance.

Interpretation

Based on the evidence from the two articles, the reader is greatly informed about the news. Both of the articles dig deep into the Trump-Kim issue, providing a background for a new reader to have an understanding of what is going on and the reason for the meeting. The authors of the articles explain to the reader deeply using the relevant subheadings about what the reader may want to know regarding the US-North Korea issue. The news is placed in a useful historical context is it outlines the international relations between the two nations. The Aljazeera article provides a better historical context of how the summit came up to that point and therefore useful historical context has been provided. Through the provision of a historical context as well as a short background at the beginning of the article, the reader is able to learn important background information about the Kim-Trump summit 2.0. Much of the attention is provided to the major news, and therefore less emphasis has been provided for the unpopular news.

Evaluation

Based on the quality of the information, the beneficiaries of the information is people from all over the world and most specifically citizens of the United States and North Korea as they are directly affected. In case a war erupts, they can be the first people to be affected, and therefore the progress of the meeting is of great significance to them. The depth of analyses affects the reader in a great way, for example by not providing the background context of the story, the readers are left hanging, wondering where the story began. It might be difficult to follow a story even despite being interesting. However, providing relevant information and facts in the story makes the reader make viable and accurate decisions about the issue as they are able to infer the results.

Engagement

The Aljazeera article does a better job in covering the story. At this point, better is determined by the relevancy of the story, the questions that the reader may ask as well as the depth of the explanation. Although both articles have done a better job in explaining the issue, Aljazeera has more information that is more factual and therefore covers the Kim-Trump issue better.

References

BBC News. 2019. Trump and Kim in Hanoi: Your need-to-know guide. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-47208489Faras Ghani, 2019. Aljazeera. Trump-Kim summit 2.0: What you need to know. Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/02/190226020435999.html

The story “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel

Atalie Delapaz

Professor

English 1302

18 March 2019

The story “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne was based during the puritan era. The narrator describes that Goodman brown went on a journey into the forest, he believe he saw many members of his community out in the forest. He believed the people in his community including his wife faith were attending the “devils” ceremony. The narrator implies that Brown may have been sleeping, though the experience was real.