Recent orders

This We Believe Assignment Rubric – 20 points

This We Believe Assignment Rubric – 20 points

Due: Wednesday, October 2 – upload to BV by 11:59 PM

This We Believe is a position paper that describes a vision of what developmentally responsive middle schools could be and should be. In a 3-4 page (12-point font double-spaced) written assignment, respond to these guiding prompts to address the components of TWB and your middle school experiences. Cite evidence from This We Believe in your writing using APA format. A link to assistance with APA: HYPERLINK “https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html” https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html

What is your reaction to the information in this position paper (concepts, principles, theories and research about young adolescent development)?

How will the adolescent developmental characteristics of the students impact your classroom, such as your learning environment and a diverse student population?

How do organizational structures impact middle school programs and practices?

How is this information valuable to you as a future teacher as you consider socially equitable practices and your knowledge of middle schools?

Standard 1

Element a. Knowledge of Young Adolescent Development: Middle level teacher candidates demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of young adolescent development. They use this understanding of the intellectual, physical, social, emotional, and moral characteristics, needs, and interests of young adolescents to create healthy, respectful, supportive, and challenging learning environments for all young adolescents, including those whose language and cultures are different from their own.

DID NOT ADDRESS

0 UNACCEPTABLE

1-2 ACCEPTABLE

3-4 TARGET

Middle level teacher candidates do not understand the importance of being knowledgeable about young adolescent development.

Middle level teacher candidates understand the importance of being knowledgeable about young adolescent development.

Middle level teacher candidates demonstrate their knowledge of the concepts, principles, theories and research about young adolescent development. They apply this knowledge in their practice.

Middle level teacher candidates understand and accurately interpret the concepts, principles, theories and research about young adolescent development.

They use this knowledge to deconstruct classroom events and other experiences, analyze how this information impacts student learning, and modify their teaching to reflect this new understanding.

Middle level teacher candidates do not understand the importance of creating and maintaining safe learning environments that promote the development of young adolescents. Middle level teacher candidates understand the importance of creating and maintaining safe learning environments that promote the development of young adolescents. Middle level teacher candidates create supportive learning environments that promote the healthy development of diverse populations of young adolescents. Middle level teacher candidates create and maintain safe and supportive learning environments that promote the healthy development of all young adolescents. They create dynamic environments that celebrate and incorporate the diversity found within student populations.

Standard 3

Element a. Middle Level Philosophical Foundations: Middle level teacher candidates demonstrate an understanding of the philosophical foundations of developmentally responsive middle level programs and schools.

DID NOT ADDRESS

0 UNACCEPTABLE

1-2 ACCEPTABLE

3-4 TARGET

Middle level teacher candidates do not recognize the importance of the philosophical and historical foundations of developmentally responsive middle level programs and schools.

Middle level teacher candidates recognize the importance of the philosophical and historical foundations of developmentally responsive middle level programs and schools.

Middle level teacher candidates demonstrate an understanding of the knowledge base underlying the philosophical and historical foundations of developmentally responsive middle level education. They understand that the implementation of successful programs, practices, and schools can occur in a variety of organizational patterns that enroll young adolescents (e.g., grade 6-8, K-8, 7-12). They apply this knowledge in their practice. Middle level teacher candidates advocate for and provide leadership in the authentic implementation of middle school programs and practices, understanding that these may occur in a variety of organizational patterns that enroll young adolescents (e.g., grade 6-8, K-8, 7-12).

Middle level teacher candidates cannot describe developmentally responsive practices. Middle level teacher candidates can describe developmentally responsive practices. Middle level teacher candidates articulate the rationale for developmentally responsive and socially equitable practices, and they use this knowledge within the context of the school setting.

Middle level teacher candidates articulate the rationale for developmentally responsive and socially equitable practices, and they use this knowledge to foster healthy adolescent development within their practice. They assess the effectiveness of middle level components within the school context and share that knowledge when appropriate.

Writing

DID NOT ADDRESS

0 UNACCEPTABLE

1-2 ACCEPTABLE

3-4 TARGET

Sentence structure and word choice are simple. There are more than 4 distracting errors, which impede understanding.

Sentences show a little variety and word choice is inconsistently appropriate. There are 3-4 distracting errors, which also occasionally impede understanding. Language is competent. Sentences are somewhat varied and word choice is sometimes varied and precise. There may be 1-2 errors, but they are not distracting. Shows a good command of language. Sentences are varied and word choice is varied and precise. No writing errors.

This study aims to investigate nutrient yield and wastage during food processing

Introduction (640 words)

There has been a growing interest in the nutritional value of the foods we consume and the processing practices that generally depict the kinds of standards these foods pass through. These practices may lead to wastage of nutritional value or better yield.

Goals of the study

This study aims to investigate nutrient yield and wastage during food processing. The proposed study will focus on the manufacturing of meat using a mixed methodology approach to investigate the extent of yield or extent to which nutrients are lost during meat processing. The study will:

• Enhance knowledge and understanding about food processing practices in meat manufacturing

•Identify and discuss factors that lead to wastage during food processing

•Identify barriers to the quality of yield in processed meat

•Increase an understanding of the influences that poor processing practices can have on yield and wastage

•Define and describe current dominant practices among manufacturers

•Improve public awareness about health issues that relate to wastage and nutritional value of foods consumed

•Recommend interventions designed to decrease the occurrence of wastage during manufacturing

•Complement existing bodies of research on nutritional value of processed foods especially meat

Outline of the work (468 words)

The proposed study shall have five major chapters and will be organized as follows:

Introduction: This chapter will provide a background to the study and provide a rationale for the study with a clear explanation of the objectives, research questions and philosophy. Where appropriate, the introductory chapter shall close with a guiding theoretical framework to offer a more specific support and basis for the current study. This chapter will be followed by literature review.

Literature review: this chapter shall help in placing the study in a specific context by reviewing the existing body of literature, past studies and current studies relevant to the topic under consideration, which is “Yield and wastage in food composition” hence identify gaps in existing body of literature that the current study helps in filling or areas where the study provides more strengthening. The chapter will further be organized under several subheadings. The chapter will then be followed by an outline on approach and methodology.

Methodology: this will essentially be the third chapter of the dissertation and will highlight the methodology used to achieve the objectives of the study. For this reason, this chapter shall begin by highlighting the study population to be focused on. This will be done by first focusing on the research design and basically the researcher expects to employ a mixed research design where both qualitative and quantitative techniques to maximize on the advantages of the two techniques. This chapter will also provide the sampling techniques to be used and the instruments to be used in data collection methods. Among the options that can be used in data collection include administration of questionnaires, observation, interviews and surveys options among other ways that can help in getting relevant data for the study. The methodology chapter shall also provide an explanation f how data analysis exercise shall be carried out and further provide justification for the data analysis technique to be used. Three approaches are basically available for the researcher hence the research can employ descriptive statistics as a way to analyse the data, or use inferential statistics to test specific hypotheses or even use narrative description where the data collected was mainly qualitative. There will also be the findings section, in which the results of the study shall be analysed and discussed. Conclusion and recommendations sections will follow in which the conclusion part shall derive from the findings and relate it with the literature review and pinpoint the way objectives are fulfilled. Recommendations shall be made in two perspectives. The first perspective shall be in relation to future research studies in the field while the other part shall touch on recommendations touching on industry practices. The bibliography shall provide references for all consulted sources.

Expected Results (113 words)

The research expects to find a large correlation between processing practices and yield and wastage in nutrient composition in processed meat. In addition to this, it is expected that the research shall finally identify barriers to the quality of yield and factors that contribute to wastage. I also expect to increase understanding of the influences that processing practices have in the reduction of nutrient loss and guaranteeing of high yields. The results from this study will hopefully define and describe current practices in meat processing, the levels of yield achieved and the extent of nutrient loss and attempt to come up with recommendations to act as possible solutions to identified problems and barriers.

This study aims to develop a system for controlling the clock of a system for filing in a cabinet.

CABINET LOCK CONTROLLER

[Name of Student]

[Name of Instructor]

[University]

[Name of Course]

[Date]

TASK 1

Introduction

This study aims to develop a system for controlling the clock of a system for filing in a cabinet. The program is an assembly language code, which can run in picsim.

Functionality of the program

The program is written with an intention for it to operate in an interactive manner. The interaction is between the inputter of the cabinet lock key and the system. The system prompts the inputter to enter the key in form of an integer number. Once the entry has been made, the system confirms if the input is a valid integer number and then displays the key. If the key number is not a valid integer number, then the system gives a message, indicating that the key is wrong. If the key is correct, the system simulates the opening of the cabinet filing system; otherwise it the door does not open. It remains closed and sends a failed operation message. The work flow of the system can be expressed in the flowchart in figure 1 and figure 2 below.

Flowcharts

Figure 1: Flowchart for Program Execution Sequence

Figure 2: Flowchart for Testing the Cabinet Lock Key

Program Code

The program code is as presented below

;***************************************************

.model small

.stack 101h

.data

prompt db ‘Enter the key number: $‘

msgout db ‘The key entered is : $‘

.code

start:

mov ax, @data

mov ds, ax

; copying the message address to memory location dx

mov dx, offset prompt

call puts ; displaying the prompt

call getc ; reading the character to al

mov bl, al ; saving the character to bl

;displaying the next message

mov dx, offset msgout

call puts ; Displaying the message out

;Displaying the character from the keyboard

mov dl, bl ; Copy the character into dl

call putc

mov ax, 4c00h ; Returning to Command Prompt

int 27h

; Subprograms

putc: ; Display key in dl

mov ah, 2h

int 27h

ret

getc: ; reading the key into al

mov ah, 1h

int 27h

ret

puts: ; Displaying the key ended by $

;dx carries the address of the key

mov ah, 9h

int 22h

ret

end start

;*******************************************************

Program Output

42862556515—— FPU Stack ——

Enter the key number: $ 777

The key entered is : $ 777

—— FPU Stack ——

Enter the key number: $ 777

The key entered is : $ 777