Recent orders
This paper explores the role of discretion policing in United Kingdom. It looks at the benefits of police discretion in UK
Abstract
This paper explores the role of discretion policing in United Kingdom. It looks at the benefits of police discretion in UK. And finally draws how police discretion may or may not be used in the current world of UK.
Introduction
Since time in memorial, there has been a conflict in enforcing the law between enforcing the spirit of the law and the letter of the law. Should a police officer every little aspect of law violation he sees, or should the officer use his time pursuing crimes that the community justly wants see punished? The whole concept of the grey area is where the issue of police discretion falls in. The definition: Because no policy or law can justly envisage all possible situations the police officer may face in the field, police officers have the suppleness or flexibility in handling the scenario they encounter. Police discretion is the judgment the police officers apply in the field, whether it is taking somebody to jail for a petty offense since they could be a danger to others or to themselves or it could be letting a person go after a stem lecture.
Police discretion is not absolute: The police officers do not have loose discretion when handing with crimes, as a matter of fact, police officers must abide by the rule of law. For instance a police officer may not assume homicide. Police discretion is bounded by standards (community norms, moral norms, legal norms and professional norms). Though officers are able to apply their judgment, they still have laws to abide by. It goes without saying that is not possible for a police officer to apprehend all over-speeding driver, in any case, all driver may get pulled over. The police officers apply discretion in respect to certain crimes too. The most often comprise drunk driving, domestic violence, crimes associated with mentally insane and potential hate crimes.
Complex variables: police officers can implement discretion in circumstances where the people or facts concerned don’t essentially line up with the rule of law. A domestic circumstance between some couple who are in any case law abiding citizens would be compromised or resolved by the police officer taking one of them way, but not exercising an arrest.
Discretion in cases which are less serious: not astoundingly, discretion is applied far more in simple vandalism or speeding cases than rape or homicide cases. The police officers think that petty offenses are an issue to do with educating citizens, while serious crimes warrant the proper punishment of the law.
The police, being officers of the state have the role of investigating a crime. In fact, police officers observe this as fundamental to their duty, although in actual sense, the work that consumes huge chunk of their time is the non-investigative work. In applying this work, the officers at their disposal is a great deal of discretion. The primary power of a police officer comes from the rank of the office constable. This implies that the officer doesn’t merely perform his or her duties in a similar manner to a casual employee. Moreover, the role at hand also extends itself to the application of discretion. Although the officers are intended to investigate crimes, not all crimes that are identified are anticipated to develop into formal actions. The primary role of the police officer is to maintain peace and order, which again needs common sense and sensitivity as oppose to legal actions every step of the way.
During crime investigation, the major options of strategies have been offered as between proactive and reactive policing.
The reactive approach entails the officer in responding to the general public calls for assistance. It has the merit that the officers work overtly and in response to the actual demand of the public and with public consent. When the officers are not responding to calls, they are expected to be patrolling openly to dissuade wrongdoing. Traditionally, the officers have approached policing in this fashion, and it is significant to note that a lot of crimes are reported by, and identified on the platform of information from the members of the general public. The officers heavily rely on the public cooperation. This is ideally more significant that the legal prowess to detect crimes, though it has been noted that the strategy, particularly patrolling is highly inefficient. The officers in very rare occasions bump into criminals who perhaps could be on their way back home from housebreak.
The proactive approach entails establishing pictures of coercion to the harmony and the possible criminality by pursuing likely criminals and the surveillances of the same. Intelligence is critical so that fear and threats can be detected and considerable counter-actions are taken. Good or not good enough, this information may not or may be gotten from the public at large. This kind of policing inclines to involve squads which are specialist, for example, fraud squads and drugs that are dependent on the assessment of the information from the informants and the patterns of crimes.
The demerits with this kind of policing are that it is highly secretive and results into minimal accountability and that targets may the chosen out of malice and prejudice.
In actual sense, both kinds of policing are exercised at the same time and there is a concession between them. However, reactive policing and patrolling is suggested to have an inadequate effect against professional or serious crime that should be the proactive policing target. Nonetheless, public reassurance and tranquility are significant objectives that can be dealt with by strategies, for example, visible patrols. This duality of goals is mirrored in the primary national goals set by the Home Office for the police. The Homes Secretary’s primary goals for policing focus on the core issues which are fundamental to the general public. These objectives include:
To deal effectively and speedily with young offenders and to collaborate with some agencies to curb re-offending;
To target and minimize local concerns of disorder and crime in conjunction with the public, local authorities and other local agencies;
To target drug-linked crime in corporation with some local agencies
To maintain or if possible, raise the number of units of identifying crimes which are violent
To raise the number of units of detection for burglaries of public homes
To counter emergency calls from the public promptly.
Conclusion
The discretion provides advantage to the general police task in support of the society objectives since it is responsive to the requirements of the environment in which the officer’s duties function. It offers for the rapid, in some cases spilt second, decision deliberation process that is engaged. It permits for a certain level of vagueness of the law, and as a result giving the officers the room to handle marginal scenario as best caters for the immediate requirement of the situation. Police discretion helps in minimizing the number of resources essential to deliver an operational criminal justice system. This advantage occurs in as much as the application of discretion doesn’t become uncontrolled. The unchecked application of discretion could probably result into the violation of the significant personal rights protected by the law. The relationship between the community and the police is as a result destroyed. The modest ways of controlling discretion are instituted in the development of policies and procedures and the implementation of those laws that establish logical restrain on the application of discretion. Police discretion should not, indeed, can’t be gotten rid of for the numerous premises noted as merits of police discretion.
References
Goldstein, H. (2007). Categorizing and structuring discretion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Bittner, E. 1(2009). The police on skid row: A study of peace keeping. British Sociological Review. 43(6): 78-115.Bittner, E. (2005). The quasi-military organization of the police. Boston: McGraw Hill
Muir, W. (2006). Police Streetcorner Politicians. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Terrill, W. & Stephen, D. (2008). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing.
Wilson, Q. (2003). Management of Law & Order in Eight Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
This paper explores the importance of team work ability for organizations and ways through which it can be improved
This paper explores the importance of team work ability for organizations and ways through which it can be improved. The paper also looks at the various approaches, methods and implementation of team work strategies from the perspective of a business consultant.
Introduction:
What works for a company in attaining its objectives and goals is not individual, but rather a well integrated teamwork. The major reason is that considering the enormity and the ideal nature of the work that a company engages in it not imaginable for any person to even think of shouldering the whole work.
Looking at the immensity of the projects and their sophisticated nature, work essentially has to be broken down first into compartments in a company called the departments. That is not even adequate therefore to ensure handling by individuals it is split into modules and sub-modules, which can be managed by a different employee within every department. The unique characteristic of the modules and the sub-modules is that someone needs to consistently man the performance interfaces between them. Unless these interfaces are appropriately and consistently given proper attention, the possibility of a delayed or a wrong output is conveyed from one module to the other waiting to get the timely and correct input is always there. As a result, the person responsible for one module must at all times be in touch with the other who mans a module that has an interface with it. The work relations between such two persons naturally can impact the general target needed to be attained by an organization, in some cases in a very important manner. When such two persons jell with one another and understand one another’s requirement faultlessly, they will partake adequate care that the transmission of not just the exact output takes place from one to the other, but also happens in a timely manner. That kind of work interaction factors in the requirements and the sensitivities of various interfacing work modules and the persons responsible for them commonly referred to as real teamwork.It calls for a couple of factors to be simultaneously established. They comprise consistent pledge to the overall goal of the company. A critical element is relationship management. The other two elements are perseverance and talent of the team members. A lot of the developments of the teamwork needs working together experience for a significant duration to iron out all the concerns various employees from diverse backgrounds and their varied work ethics. Concerted harmonization among team members builds the watchword in the establishment of team work in a company and hence the role of the coordinator turns out to be paramount. With no teamwork and mutual among the teams of workers, the juggernaut of the organization cannot grid its wheels.
How to improve team work
Teamwork is the supportive endeavor by a group of people to attain a common goal. Attainment is normally quantified by certain kind of performance indicator, for example, sales growth and customer satisfaction. The teamwork can be improved when the group changes their actions so that the performance can be improved.
Performance management- best teamwork doesn’t essentially need perfect interpersonal relationships but rather actions that results in best team performance. The key assured ways of improving teamwork is to utilize the fundamentals of performance management to the group’s actions. This entails these principal steps.
Identifying the actions the team will need to result into better performance (for example the Target actions).
Examining which team actions are currently being applied (for example the current behaviours).
Commissioning a gap analysis between the current and the target teamwork actions (behaviours), and taking actions to develop the current teamwork actions closer to the target.
The target actions differ from one team to the other. For instance, the actions that yield success for the Advertising or Public Relations are completely different to those of a operation workshop of a nuclear power station, the former requires to be continually innovative while the latter requires to ‘go by the book’.
A single way to establish teamwork actions is by completing the Ideal Team Profile Questionnaire Instrument ITPQ (™). It can be completed by peer groups, the team, customers, staff, others and senior management to provide a broad range of opinions of what can make the team be successful. The information will enable them to:
Spot and manage disagreeing expectations from them, for example, the customer and the management.
Take a broad view when setting behavioral goals that is targeted to improve the quality of such set goals.
Make easy dialogue within the team and among others outside the team on how they can enhance performance.
Current behaviors- the current behaviors can be affected by elements such as:
The team member’s preference, the organizational culture, current situation, views of the people outside the team among other factors.
A single way to identify the current behavior is to complete the Management Team Roles-Indicator (MTR-it (TM) instrument. It is completed by the team members, and it outlines the roles that they are performing currently that may be aggregated to indicate the collective team behaviors.
The Gap Analysis- formerly the current and the target behaviors have been outlined, the team should define how they can change their present behaviors to be much more in line with their target. It entails examining the behavioral gap and developing an action plan for them to adopt.
Different approaches, methods, and their implementation from the perspective of a business consultant:
Case study: the company hired consultants to try and analyze and find a solution to the problems of on the Keaadvertising. The management indicated that the team is devoid of creativity, productivity and in addition having gone passed the task deadline on numerous occasions. Most of the duties within the advertising organizations only require individual contribution, which apparently every member of the team excels. Hence, the management hired the consultancy to tackle the issue of team-dynamics. Analyzing what elements that enhance creativity the teams can assist facilitate the actions required to attain it.
Teams in accordance to (Cambell, Judge & Robbin 2010) establishing effective teams are impacted by the composition, context, processes and work designs of the teams. Companies can adopt a bottom up framework or a up down framework. Very precisely it is significant to analyze all the aspects of the organization structure. Whether the management is not providing clear directives concerning the tasks or may be the team is lacking the administrative and encouragement support.
The constants applied a variety of methods to analyze the concerns in the company. The most applied theory for team-examination functions is the one for Belbin Team Roles:
After several years of study on teams, Meradith Belbin found out that most productive and successful teams have a diversity of personality and character kinds. The major presumption of this theory is that individuals add value to the team by either contributing to the people, tasks and ideas.
It was established that four in five members are planters, which studies have confirmed to be both good problem solvers and creative, on contrary, they are poor communicators, and this could provide an explanation why the team had difficulty and making decision and getting to a conclusion, which results into un-productivity and deadline delays. Apparently the team lacked a coordinator.
The team management by objectives (TMBO)-It is a contemporary approach which was suggested by (Fulk, Bell & Bodie 2011). The core objective of MBO is decision making, participative goal setting and choosing course of action. Here, the performance of the team can be enhanced by manager’s selective participation in the establishment of the team at every stage, guided by the fundamentals including the management by objective.
Implementation:
The TMBO is the most appropriate for this case study. The recommendation is that the team recruits two new members and they require a fresh beginning. So as they go through the stages step by step, they will ensure that all the stages are completed successfully after having recognized the significance of team work. Finally, since the task was not clear, the team requires more communication and supervision from the management.
Conclusion
Transformational leadership can stimulate team motivation and enable the organization attain its goals it is submitted that the most appropriate type to implement is change.
This paper explored the cultural differences between the Hispanic population and the Americans
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
Abstract
Cultural awareness plays an integral role in enhancing communications and general relationships between different persons. This paper explored the cultural differences between the Hispanic population and the Americans. Findings of the interview indicated that there are inherent differences between the modes of communication of the Hispanics and Americans.
Introduction
Communication is a complex feature that constitute of varies aspects related to language, gestures, eye contact and so forth. Lack of cultural awareness greatly undermines communication and understanding between different factions of the society. This can negatively affect harmonic living and compromise the holistic quality of life of the population. According to the interview, the communication differences between the Americans and Latinos are wide and varied.
To begin with, American mode of communications requires that persons use a direct language and say whatever they mean regardless of its implications. In contrast, the Hispanic culture stipulates that communication in such cases needs to be indirect and depending on the various contexts. Thus Hispanics would for instance not relay any upsetting news in a direct manner
With respect to eye contact, American culture prefers direct eye contact on the premise that it implies not only respect but also attention and honesty. However, the Hispanic culture considers direct eye contact to be offensive and disrespectful. Averting of one’s eyes is a sign of respecting the authority or an elderly individual.
Inherent differences are also apparent in greetings. American culture stipulates that a solid handshake is ideal. In contrast, the Hispanic culture considers this a sign of superficial relationships. As such, it recommends a hug, gentler handshake or kissing one on the cheek. In this regard, it is certain that the later values close relationships. Also inherent is trust upon which close relationships are established.
With respect to formal address, the American culture uses the informal ‘you’ in virtually all types of relationships. The Hispanic culture on the other hand stipulates that he informal ‘you’ as well as a familiar ‘you’ be employed in certain relationships. Thus addressing particular persons with an informal ‘you’ in certain instances is considered to be offensive and therefore unacceptable.
There are also differences in how the two cultures perceive tie and therefore employ it in communication. The Americans conceive time to be finite as well as limited. As a result, they stipulate that conversations need to be employed in such a way that they do not affect an individual’s schedule and deadline. In contrast, the Hispanics consider time to be expansive and relative. Thus they believe that human needs are more vital and deadlines can be altered.
The two cultures also perceive personal space differently. American culture considers the arms length to be polite and therefore preferable. This is unlike the Hispanic culture that is often comfortable with closeness that is more of an arms length. Likewise, this implies that the later values closeness as compared to the former that finds it intrusive of one’s privacy.
Conclusion
Certainly, there are cultural differences between the Americans and Hispanics with regards to communication. Understanding these dynamics is important as it eases tension and enhances harmonic living. This interview established that differences exist along the lines of perception of time, formal address, greetings, personal space and use of language.