Recent orders
a critique view on the article organization goals and priorities and the job satisfaction of the United States journalists
Organization Behavior
(Name)
(University)
(Instructor)
(Course)
(Date)
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a critique view on the article organization goals and priorities and the job satisfaction of the United States journalists. The article presents a research carried out to investigate the impact of organization goals prioritization on the job satisfaction of the employees. The research was governed by the objective of determining the factors associated with job satisfaction of the employees. The study employed American journalist data collected in a sequence of ten years since 1971. In addition, scholarly survey data was employed in the research. The research established that job satisfaction is a key element for better performance of an organization. Nevertheless, prioritization of organization goals and job satisfaction had a negative correlation.
Topic of the Article:
The topic of the article is very crucial in the conceptualization and understanding of an organization behavior management and the advancement of organization effectiveness in UAE. The article addresses the issue of organizations priorities in their goals and job satisfaction of the United States (U.S) journalist. It is very evident that, an effective organization achieves goals through satisfaction of employees in their jobs. In this, employees’ performance improves, they develop self-driven morale in their working environment, and their loyalty to the organization increases extensively. The article depicts that in some organizations; the organization management has a major concern on the achievement of the goals and forgets that there is a need for the employee to get job satisfaction in all situations. In addition, the article demonstrates the importance of job satisfaction in an organization and how job satisfaction aids in development of the morale of the employees.
Since all organizations have a goal of attaining effectiveness in their endeavors, the article shows the key area that needs address by an organization. Employees in an organization are the principle elements for success attainment, and thus, the article makes it clear that the employee needs to enjoy their working environment, and get job satisfaction at the same-time. Therefore, the topic of the article is very important in understanding organization behavior and effectiveness advancement.
Introduction:
The introduction of the article gives a captivating idea of the necessity of job satisfaction and morale in an organization. The introduction, therefore, captures the readers mind and at the same time develops a criticizing picture in the mind of the reader. In addition, the introduction makes it clear what the study was about, and at the same time, how the results of the study will find use in different sectors. Included in the introduction part of the article are the problem statement, and aims and objectives of the study. The problem statement makes it vivid that job satisfaction and morale of employees need development in the organization. This has a backing of employees who look for profits and gains, and forget that their employees have a need. This develops a picture the reader of an existing problem and the reader is anxious of reading the content to find the solutions stipulated to the inherent problem.
On the other hand, the aims and objectives section of the article depicts the driving force to the study, and items expected to find a solution at the end of the study. The objectives and problem statement illustration is very clear, and the reader identifies a need for reading the article, as well as why the article was written quickly. Therefore, the introduction makes the reader understand job satisfaction, need for job satisfaction, purpose of the study, and applicability of the results attained at the end of the study. The introduction further gives a broad picture of the organization need for employee job satisfaction.
Literature review:
The literature review exhibited by the article is very comprehensive and up-to-date. The review has a base on both nineteenth and twentieth scholarly works. In addition, the review pays attention to other research work carried out previously on job satisfaction, and the findings obtained from the same. In this, the author of the article acknowledges other scholarly work on job satisfaction. This includes their findings, how they conducted their research, and their definitions of the terminology job satisfaction.
The literature review elaborates the meaning of the term job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction with regard to organization working environment. Moreover, the review illustrates why organizations should ensure job satisfaction for their employees, and how measurement of job satisfaction occurs in an organization. Exploration of the inherent factors that limit job satisfaction has occurred intensively in the review of the literature. Finally, literature review has identified means that aid in job satisfaction, and drawbacks of dissatisfied job in an organization.
Methods:
The article presents a research that begun with hypotheses formulation. However, the formulated hypotheses had assumptions attached. The assumption aided in the design of the research methodology for the study. The hypotheses stipulated had a well-based framework that aided in the conducting of the research. The hypotheses variables for the research included organization goals and job roles, organization’s goals and priorities and job satisfaction, and professional goals and job roles.
The hypotheses had expectations that employees will always find job satisfaction in all circumstances in which their employers have values that match their values. A positive correlation was also expected between job satisfaction and professional goals, when the organizations emphasize on professional goals. In addition, a negative correlation was expected between job satisfaction and organization goals, in circumstances in which the organization emphasizes on achievement of its goals. Finally, employees were expected to view achievement of organization goals as unethical, since their major desire is job satisfaction.
Data collection:
Data collection method employed was insufficient to develop a comprehensive conclusion to the current trend of organization behavior. This has the backing of the fact that, the study did not collect its own data for use in the analysis purposes, but it relied on the previous collected data. Other researchers had collected data in the past; therefore, this data lacked an element of depicting the current behavior of organization with regard to employee job satisfaction. However, since the data used had a historical background, that is, the data collection has being occurring since 1971 (Beam 2006), establishment of the trend in the organization behavior towards job satisfaction was possible. The data combined other survey data done on a variety of topics, which include demographic traits exhibited, the roles of journalists, attitude of employees towards the work, the existing political beliefs, and various ethical issues that arise in the working environment. Thus, the data was adequate to develop inference on job satisfaction of employees, and organization goals prioritization purposes.
Analysis:
Job satisfaction was the key dependent variable used in the analysis of the data collected. In order to measure job satisfaction, the posed question to respondents had an element of determining, how satisfied the employee was with the job. This was an effective means of determining job satisfaction among the employees in the organization. Statistical tools, such as hierarchical multiple regression and difference-of-means test found application in the data analysis of the research conducted. The regression analysis independent variables were the responses of respondents collected towards organization goals. The effectiveness of this was established since the respondents had an option of, ranking personal, perception of the importance of organization goals. In order to determine the level of organization emphasize on achieving the goals. The respondents had to rate their personal perception of how the organization owners considered the organization goals. As such, the respondents gave feedback that enhanced the effectiveness of data analysis.
Multiple-regression analyses control variables included the type of media, organization size, ownership of the organization, the level of employee autonomy at work while in the organization, and the frequency in which respondent had received feedback from supervisors. This analysis was comprehensive to warrant attainment of accurate and concise results for the research conducted. The enrichment of data analysis occurred through drawing of tables that enhanced visualization of the inherent correlations among the variables under investigation.
Results:
The analysis of results had the element of efficiency and accuracy. This occurred since the results analysis, presentation followed the research questions stipulated, and the hypotheses formulated. The results presentation occurred systematically; thus, the reader can follow them effectively and gather relevant information. However, presentation of the results would have occurred more effectively by drawing graphs. This is due to the fact that, graphs aid in depicting relationships more effectively than tables.
Strengths of the Article:
The article bears strength in that, the idea flow of the aim of the research of influence organization goals prioritization and job satisfaction of employees from the beginning to the end is coherent. The problem statement, aim and objectives, are clearly stated. The methodology adopted in the research is very effective, not forgetting the clearly outlined hypotheses for the research. Data analysis and discussion of results also occurs in a coherent manner. Finally, the adoption of the various statistical tools, such as multiple regressions in the analysis of the data gives strength to the research article.
Weaknesses of the Article:
The article has an inherent limitation of using another data. The research should have incorporated current data in the previous data for a more effective inference depiction. Globalization and technology levels receive dynamics throughout (Harris and Hartman 2002). Therefore, basing analysis on past data alone is not adequate to make a concrete conclusion about the current situation of organization management in all sectors. This is because; the dynamics in globalization and technology influence the management systems of organizations.
Contribution of the Article:
The article is an effective tool that aids in revealing to organization managers that employee job satisfaction needs alignment and balance with the focus in attainment of the organization goals. The article further depicts the necessity of job satisfaction of employees in an organization, and the accrued benefits of job satisfaction for the employees (Griffin and Moorhead 2007). The article, therefore, contributes effectively in the broader knowledge of organization behavior. Despite the fact that, the findings from the article are well known, most of the organization managers find it difficult to create a working environment for their employees, which would aid in achievement of individual job satisfaction for the employees.
Readability of the Article:
The article has well established organization structure that allows flow of the idea from the beginning to the end. The article creates a revelation to managers, and organization behavior practitioner of a silent element that aids in achievement of better results for the organization. The article makes this group decipher how job satisfaction is attainable in an organization, and the benefits of job satisfaction in an organization. Most organization have a tendency of concentrating in goal achievement, and forget that the driving force (employees) have needs that deserve attention. These needs include job satisfaction and morale development among other needs.
Conclusion:
The article represents a research that involved investigation of the employees’ job satisfaction status. As such, research has a major contribution in the area of organization behavior and organization advancement strategy. Therefore, the study acts as a revelation to managers of the various organizations of the need of ensuring that employees attain job satisfaction. Nevertheless, the managers need to focus on attaining the organization goals, but this is better aligned with employees’ job satisfaction. This is because, when employees perceive that they have a job satisfaction, their morale and loyalty towards the organization develops effectively.
However, the research had a limitation of inferring the current impact of organization behavior on job satisfaction. Despite the fact that, the research attained a concrete trend of the organization behavior, there was a need of the research depicting the current trends of organization behavior towards the employee job satisfaction endeavors. Although, the research did not adopt graphs in data analysis and presentation, the adoption of other statistical tools in the data collection, analysis, and presentation process presented accuracy in the findings of the research.
Bibliography
Beam, Randal, 2006. Organizational Goals and Priorities and the Job Satisfaction of U.S
Journalists. J & MC Quarterly Vol. 83, No. 1.
Griffin, R, & Moorhead, G, 2007. Organizational Behavior: Managing People and
Organizations. Ninth Edition. South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Harris, O, & Hartman, S, 2002. Organization Behavior. The Second Edition. Binghamton:
The Haworth Press. Inc
The real-world, arguable problem for Paper 2
Paper 2 – Research Proposal
Formal Requirements:
500-800 words. Typed, double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins.
You may use first person (I) when discussing your research, but an objective third person is often better for analysis.
You may NOT use the second person (you) in your analysis.
Must have quotes, paraphrase, and summaries with citations from three relevant research sources.
Instructions:
Paper 2 will be a written proposal for your Research Paper Project, which will later include Paper 3 – Annotated Bibliography (with a Research Presentation) and Paper 4 – The Research Paper. Before you begin detailed research, you need to find a real-world, arguable research problem approved by your instructor, so writing this proposal will help you plan your project and articulate your potential arguments. The real-world, arguable problem for Paper 2 must come from your current or planned Texas State major or a potential career after graduation. The proposal must include:
I. Introduction (one paragraph): Write an intro for the Research Proposal emphasizing your reasons for writing about your chosen topic and the importance of the issue to your future career.
A. Hook: Remember to use a little pathos to hook the reader. Snag your reader’s interest with vivid, concrete language, with human interest. Be subtle but be interesting.
B. Development: Discuss the problem in your future career and include some audience analysis (Consider: Who is your audience/opposition? Walk in their shoes for a while and try to determine why they think like they do, and what are the best, most compelling arguments for their position. What about your argument for change, for a new perspective, scares them the most? Now that you have become them, have understood their fears and resistance, what would be the most persuasive ways to overcome their fears and resistance?) Transition to your thesis statement at the end of this paragraph and see if you don’t have a great suspended, or climactic paragraph.
C. Thesis Statement (one sentence): A thesis statement is one sentence, and always an opinion. In this case it’s an arguable position on a controversial topic. You may end up taking a fairly moderate position on the topic, but your thesis is still specific. (Example: While many think political parties serve to organize the administration of government, mainstream parties in America have polarized the nation by building mistrust among lawmakers and stifling other potential voices in our democratic republic.)
II. Background/History of the subject (one paragraph): Trace a brief history of your controversy and bring the reader up to date on where the issue stands today. Do this section in chronological order, briefly hitting major landmarks from the beginning of the controversy until its current state. You should do basic research online (on the web and/or through the library website) to get this information. Direct quotations for basic history aren’t necessary, but any paraphrase or summary of sources MUST BE CITED using the MLA format.
III. Proofs: Based on your preliminary research, discuss what you want to prove {2 thesis points (not including the counterargument in your refutation)} as your paragraph topics. Use complete topic sentences to label each proof, and include any quotes/paraphrases/summaries from your sources that you will cite as evidence. MLA CITATIONS REQUIRED. Explain how this evidence will support your proposed thesis and what kinds of other evidence you will need to fully develop the argument. [SEE SUGGESTED OUTLINE ON NEXT PAGE.]
III. Proofs (continued).
A. Topic sentence about thesis point #1.
1. Evidence, ideally paraphrased, MLA cited in parentheses.
2. Explanation how this evidence addresses your point and relates to the further research needed.
3. Evidence, ideally paraphrased, MLA cited in parentheses.
4. Explanation how this evidence addresses your point and relates to the further research needed.
B. Topic sentence about thesis point #2.
1. Evidence, ideally paraphrased, MLA cited in parentheses.
2. Explanation how this evidence addresses your point and relates to the further research needed.
3. Evidence, ideally paraphrased, MLA cited in parentheses.
4. Explanation how this evidence addresses your point and relates to the further research needed.
IV. Refutation (one paragraph): While some elements of refutation should be covered in your Proofs, this paragraph will focus on naming and then refuting (disproving) any counterargument unaddressed or you have yet to overcome. The opposing view should already appear as part of your thesis, but the refutation should give the specific attack(s) that the opposing view would make against your thesis claim. Based on preliminary research, discuss these possible counterarguments and any evidence you have for refutation. CITE EVIDENCE.
V. Conclusion (one paragraph): Sum up what you’ve already proven about your topic and what still needs to be proved. Bear in mind that a conclusion is future-oriented, gives the reader a directive about the future, about why this topic is important and deserves further research. If possible, employ subtle yet effective pathos here, and vivid, concrete language.
VI. Works Cited Page: Full list of cited sources on its own page in the paper. Put on the last page in correct MLA format with sources alphabetized by first line.
Rubric:
15 points Well-developed, clear thesis statement that proposes a research topic.
15 pointsSufficient preliminary evidence to support background of the subject, proofs, etc.
40 pointsStrong overall organization, topic/transition sentences, and intro/conclusion paragraphs.
15 pointsCorrect MLA Format.
15 pointsAttended conference with printed draft and sources.
Deadlines:
Bring written thesis statement to classThursday2/26
Bring research proposal draft and sources to one-on-one conference (sign up on TRACS)2/28, 3/05
Final Draft Due on TRACS /Assignments by 11:55pmWednesday 3/8
CRJ 419 Midterm Exam
CRJ 419 Midterm Exam
Professor Hong Lu
This exam contains THREE QUESTIONS. The total length of your answers to these questions is between 1,200 and 1,350 words. Label each part of your answers clearly (e.g., Q1a), Q1b), etc) and put the word count at the end of each QUESTION. Put your full name on top of the first page of your document, and save your document in .doc or .docx.
QUESTION 1
Cite Chapter 3 and Readings 4 and 5 to answer the following subquestions (400-450 words in total for Question 1):
Cite 3 Supreme Court’s decisions discussed in Reading 4 to demonstrate that the Court has recognized a bodily or physical autonomy right.
Assuming the bodily autonomy right is fundamental and the Court is to apply strict scrutiny to the federal prohibition of marijuana use, discuss how the federal government will justify a “compelling interest” in restricting the right to marijuana use in two aspects.
A court rejected a nurse’s lawsuit against Biden administration’s vaccine mandate for federally funded health care facilities, which cited the bodily autonomy right. Describe the relevant legal doctrine and two substantive reasons specific to this case that the court may have used in rejecting the lawsuit (refer to Chapter 3 and Reading 5 for the legal doctrine). Also see this link for the vaccine mandate and court ruling. https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/scotus-narrowly-upholds-health-worker-vaccine-mandate/617000/Question 2
Cite Chapter 4 and Readings 6 and 7 to answer the following subquestions (400-450 words in total for Question 2):
What are the standards for a plea?
What are the safeguards for preventing conviction of the innocent by plea bargain?
Under the plea bargain framework, which type of lawyers will be more effective: the gladiator or the problem solver type of lawyers? Define each type of lawyers first and then explain.
Question 3
Cite Chapter 7 and Readings 11 and 12 to answer the following subquestions (400-450 words in total for Question 3):
What is tort reform and what are the three proposed changes for reforming personal injury damages in reading 12 “Let the damages fit the wrong”?
Is the McDonald’s coffee spill case a frivolous lawsuit (see reading 11)? Why or why not?
Which doctrine is more appropriate for the McDonald’s coffee spill case, contributory negligence or comparative negligence? Explain.
