Recent orders

Actors in Policymaking

Actors in Policymaking

Name:

Institutional Affiliation:

The statement “actors are individuals, collectives or corporations involved in the policymaking process who seek to turn their preferences into public policy” is an accurate one. The process of making policies often culminates in the fulfilment of the wants of specific factors involved in the process. Examples of individual actors can be politicians or leaders of certain special rights groups. Collectives can refer to any grouping of people who want to push a certain agenda in the policymaking process. Corporations are large companies or collection of companies that enjoy rights similar to that of individuals. Corporations are therefore recognized and allowed to act like one entity under the law. Individuals, collectives and corporations have different motivations and goals with regard to public policy, and they use their influence and positions to ensure that public policy reflects their desires and interests.

Examples of individuals with the ability to influence public policy include politicians. When a politician decides to run for offices, they usually have a manifesto outlining their vision, and they use this to convince voters to vote for them (Erikson 2015). A person running for office can do so under a political party or as an independent candidate. Under a party, an individual adheres to party politics and views on public policy. For example, the Republican Party in the United States is a conservative party, and some of its core beliefs include the protection of gun rights, free-market capitalism, pro-life views as well as low taxes. A person running on the Republican ticket will, therefore, have to subscribe to these conservative views, and this will influence their public policy stances. A Republican will hold such beliefs dear and will do everything possible to change or create public policies in line with them. Corporations also exert a lot of influence on policymaking because of their significant resources, with their main agenda being the setting of policies that will promote their operations and profit-making objectives.

Problem definition and agenda-setting are essential parts of public policy, and individuals, collectives and corporations play a significant role in these two aspects. For example, influential politicians such as the president are often involved in the agenda-setting phase of public policy. Agenda-setting determines which issues get a lot of attention in the public domain (Birkland 2015). If a president or legislator wishes to change or create policies on a particular topic, they will take actions to ensure this. Such actions will include presenting bills in the House of Representatives, running advertisements, giving public speeches and others. Problem definition is also important because different parties can define the same problem differently (Barbehön et al. 2015). Taking the issue of gun rights, a conservative will insist that gun rights must be protected at all costs while liberals would argue that gun rights should not come before public safety and the protection of human rights. Public opinion sways depending on how the problem is defined.

Individuals have the greatest influence on policy agendas and outcomes. Some of the most influential people in society are politicians and leaders of notable groups and organizations such as religious groups and nongovernmental organizations. These individuals have many people under their guidance and leadership; hence, they set the agenda when it comes to policymaking. Elections give a chance to candidates to present their manifestos and voters then elect those that they feel best represent their interests (Klijn & Koppenjan 2017). Those who get elected to the legislature can then introduce bills and other legislations which will shape public policy. Other powerful and influential individuals outside the legislature, such as leaders of religious and lobby groups, can also create awareness around a particular issue and call for changes in policy around the issues in question.

Individuals interact with formal institutions during the policy process. Because the majority of the influential individuals hold seats in the legislature and other arms of government, they are a part of those institutions tasked with the creation and amendment of policies (Birkland 2015). These actors, therefore, make use of their positions in formal institutions to by presenting pieces of legislation to be deliberated upon, and if passed, they become law. Other individuals outside the legislature can also present petitions and speeches to legislative bodies such as Congress to create awareness on some areas of public policy (Erikson 2015). Public opinion has a significant impact on the influence and success of individuals as actors in the policymaking process. When an individual has a lot of popularity among the public, any policy issues that they raise will get a lot of attention in the public domain. The president of any country is one such example he or she is quite influential if they were voted in by a majority of the citizens. When an issue has gained significant public interest, it is hen legislated upon, and many times, the votes will reflect public opinion (Klijn & Koppenjan 2017). Legislators and members of the executive are an integral part of policymaking, and their votes should reflect those of the people who elected them into office.

In conclusion, the process of policymaking involves many actors such as individuals, collectives and corporations. While all these exert significant influence in the process, individuals usually have the biggest say. Some influential individuals include politicians and leaders of groups such as religious and lobby groups. Politicians are part of the formal institutions that come up with policies or amend existing ones, usually based on public opinion because the politicians in the different arms of government should represent the view of their people.

References

Barbehön, M., Münch, S., & Lamping, W. (2015). Problem definition and agenda-setting in critical perspective. In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.Erikson, J. (2015). Ideas and actors in policy processes: where is the interaction?. Policy Studies, 36(5), 451-467.

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2017). Rediscovering the citizen: new roles for politicians in interactive policy making. In Public participation and innovations in community governance (pp. 141-164). Routledge.

Case Study – Maria

Subject

Students Name

Institution of Affiliation

Date

Case Study – Maria

Question 1

Maria could have avoided being in the current situation that has torn down her financials through various reasons. For one, she could not have moved to her new apartment as we are made aware that before she was able to plan for every coin, having a savings plan of 50 dollars every month. The savings started disappearing once she settled in her new apartment. It is not that her apartment cost her too much but the consequences of moving led to extra costs. Another way that she could have avoided the situation is consulting with other experienced people who live alone, as they could have helped her with advice on where to start. She says that she doesn’t know where to start but she doesn’t consult and this leads her to make a poor decision. Besides, she is a college student, spending most of her time in school and part-time she is employed, meaning she has less time at her apartment. Through this information, she could maximize her time at work and in school to make friends and have a good time such that she would only go to bed in her apartment reducing the extra costs.

Question 2

Maria will be faced with significant financial consequences as a result of her behavior. To begin with, she will deplete her savings as she no longer saves any amount and uses the savings to pay her expenses. Her expenses escalate every month hitting a double of her monthly spending leaving no amount to be saved. If Maria continues with this trend, she will find herself into debts, having depleted her savings and therefore she will be using her salary to writing off debts. She, therefore, needs to revert from this kind of behavior.

Question 3

To correct her situation, Maria has multiple solutions to choose from based on her problem. One she has to call off her dinner treats with her friends as they are the main causes of her poor spending. She has to focus on her savings and education since she is in scholarship. Another thing is that she has to start making meals by herself so that she cuts the extra expenses made on food as more that 100 dollars have been spent in the restaurants. Maria, therefore, has to consult from the chefs on how to make a one-person meal to avoid wastage. She fears wasting food, but she wastes a lot of money on the same food. Another way is by keeping herself occupied in the apartment to reduce loneliness; she can do this by reading books, watching movies or finding a pet such as a dog to play with and keep her company. Another way she can correct her situation is by moving from her new apartment and go back to her previous settlement as during her stay there; she had everything in control.

Question 4

The poor financial behavior can affect Maria’s college success negatively in that she will lose focus on her education in her bid to collect herself together. She may be faced with depression as she will be left with almost nothing to cater for her bills and savings and therefore keep worrying about her bankruptcy. She doesn’t want to lose her dining friends, but she doesn’t realize her financial strain that may deprive her the peace of mind making it difficult to concentrate on education.

Activity My Keywords

Activity: My Keywords

Student’s Name

Institution Affiliation

Course Name and Code

Professor’s Name

Date

Topic: Poor performance and female students

Variation of identity- Poor performance by students

Specific identity- Females students

Synonyms

Poor performance- Underperformance, substandard performance, disappointing performance, or mediocre performance.

Female students- Female pupils, girl students, female learners, girl learners, students of the female sex, women learners, school girls, women students

Subtopics where I can mine for some keyword

Poor performance of girls in mathematics

School-based factors that affect girl’s performance

Factors affecting female student performance

Factors influencing academic performance of girls

Boolean keyword search

(“underperformance* OR “poor performance*) AND (“female students” OR girls OR Female pupils OR girl students OR female learners) NOT boys

After trying the Boolean keyword search on google

At first, the results were not helpful, and therefore had to refine them. At first, when I included all the synonyms, their results were generally on poor performance based on gender differences and therefore not specific to the female students; performance. Consequently, I had to use a few synonyms to get a helpful search result.