Recent orders
The Pearl (1947)
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
The Pearl (1947)
The Pearl (1947) by John Steinback follows the life of a poor fisherman, his wife, and his child after stumbling upon a magnificent pearl stone. He seeks to use the stone to gain status and wealth, but thieves are after it. Kino, just like everybody else, desires to have a better life, whatever means that is necessary. Kino, the Indian pearl diver’s son, is bitten by a scorpion sting. He is in an anxious state, and despite this he manages to get his son medical assistance. He had hoped to have a grand wedding and get better clothes, guns, and education for his son, but none of those dreams are likely to happen. He attempts to escape but with professional hitmen after the real tragedy erupts. He eventually decides no pearl is worth the life of his dear family, so he is left with no option rather than throwing the pearl back. The story comes as a subtle warning that dreams of overnight and magical solutions to their problems.
The film The Pearl (1947) does a good job of highlighting the negative representation of indigenous people in society. Kino and his family are of Indian descent. The film illustrates how indigenous people received adverse treatment because of their low economic status and race. Kino was a poor peal swimmer and he and his family did not have much. As a matter of fact, they relied on fishing as their main source of livelihood. When Coyotito, Kino’s son, is bitten by a scorpion and is fighting for his dear life, the doctor declines to help them because Kino could not offer him money. This points to the oppression and colonial arrogance that existed at the time. People who liked the way Kino looked (Indians) were treated poorly and oppressed. The doctor displays a condescending attitude, and he shows his apparent self-centered and limited mindset. It is almost as if the doctor is frighteningly showcasing his belief in the superiority of his culture over Kino’s culture. The doctor wants to remind Kino of his power to either destroy or make lives. Steinback criticizes the doctor’s entire colonial society of greed, ambition, and arrogance. The European colonizers governing Kino and the native people are shown how they bring destruction to a native society of piety, innocence, and purity.
Undoubtedly, the Pearl makes references to numerous racial, gender, and ethnic issues using the characters. Kino is asleep when his wife Juana takes the pearl and throws the pearl into the ocean. At this point, his wife is fed up with the problems that have followed them since Kino took the pearl. She just wants to get rid of it as it has only brought them nothing but bad luck. When Kino finds out what Juana has done, he turns violent. He strikes her so that she can release the pearl, and in the process, she falls onto the rocks and plunges into the water. This clearly illustrates unequal gender roles and their link to physical abuse. In this environment, men have deemed the head of the family. As such, they were the main decision-makers. So when Kino discovered that Juana had taken it upon herself to throw away the pearl that had been the cause of their problems thus far, he must have felt violated and disregarded as the central authority in the family. This explains his sudden reaction to striking Juana when she fell into the ocean to her death. Juana was only doing what she felt was right to keep herself and her ailing son safe. This is unexpected in society as women were expected to conform and abide by norms. Physical abuse and unequal family roles are the two main core effects of gender inequality. The example depicts a case of gender inequality as Kino did not harm Juana until they say she took a step that was meant to keep her family safe. Abuse of any form is never okay and should not be tolerated at all costs in society. Additionally, the doctor saw that Kino’s son was in dire need of a doctor, yet he still refused to help them out points to a bigger racial issue than just money. When asked to help, he hurls a racist comment that he was a doctor and not a veterinary. Kino shows the doctor that he has money, but that is still not enough to convince him to treat his son. The comment he makes is racist and it only shows the real reason he refuses to treat Coyocito because of his Indian race. Kino was Indian and his kind was despised starved, and robbed at the time.
In terms of cinematography, The Pearl (1947), a Mexican American film, enjoys a beautiful black and white background. The drama is a classic, and judging by the year of pits publication, the black and white background seemed a good fit for the storyline. On the other hand, Redes, directed by Emilio Gomez Muriel and Fred Zinnermann, has a turbulent production background. Despite this, it still does a brilliant job at appeasing its audience. The sounds and shots in both films were also concise and clear, an indication of the prowess of the producers.
The patriot movie
Student’s name
Instructor
Course
Date
The patriot movie
Rating- 4 stars
The rating means a movie headed towards an excellent or a masterpiece that would get a 5-star rating. However, since it has not yet arrived there, I use four stars to mean very good.
Summary
This movie tries to argue and prove to the audience that pacifism is just futile and it is not the best thing a person can because the person ends up suffering more than the one who offended him in the desire to keep peace and not fight for a person’s rights. It compares the British with the Americans, whereby the Americans are seen as brave while the British are seen as sadistic monsters. The movie surrounds Mel Gibson, who acts as a widower with seven children. He is being pushed by conditions placed on him by the Americas to join them in the war. Even though he is not willing, the British threaten to take him away. Even though they are afraid of what might happen, they face the soldiers with a lot of courage and win against them, which to most people is unexpected.
Historical accuracies and inaccuracies
One of the significant issues presented in the movie is the representation of reality through the characters. Benjamin martin represented Francis Marion, a pioneer of guerrilla tactics, and used them on the British by hitting their supply and communication lines. They knew he was in the area of Carolina. Another historical accuracy is that the movies’ battles were actual battles happening in America at the time. These included the battles of cow-pens and Camden. Historical inaccuracies include that the French were seen to help the continental army in the war, which had happened before that in reality. In the movie, Benjamin is also seen as a person of many morals; however, he is not a man of many morals in a real sense.
In conclusion, we can say that history is what the present chooses to remember about the past. This is true since making history and writing it down is our responsibility. Therefore a person can decide to write history in a partially correct manner, and that sticks like it is in the patriot movie.
Works cited
“The Patriot – Movie Review.” Www.commonsensemedia.org, 24 Aug. 2009, www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/the-patriot. Accessed 12 Mar. 2021.
Ebert, Roger. “The Patriot Movie Review & Film Summary (2000) | Roger Ebert.” Https://Www.rogerebert.com/, www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-patriot-2000.
George Jr, William Ross St. “The Patriot.” (2000): 1146-1148.
A Backroom Deal with the Governor article
A Backroom Deal with the Governor article
Name:
University:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
A Backroom Deal with the Governor article
This essay is from the school of thought that Tesla should be allowed to directly operate stores and consequently sell to the consumers in New Jersey. This is because the various auto dealers have a significant conflict of interest that exists between the promotion of the gasoline cars that constitutes of virtually the whole of their revenue and the electric cars that actually constitutes of none. Furthermore, is not easy for the dealers to sell a new technology car since people are used to the older ones. It is therefore common knowledge that the dealers will simply sell what they find easy to sell which is the old cars making Tesla unable to sell and this could even lead to their bankruptcy as it happened to General Motors and Chrysler in the past.
Another issue is that since the dealers make a larger portion of their profit from the servicing of the cars while the electric cars produced by Tesla does not require much service as compared to the gasoline cars. There are no fuel filter or spark plug changes, no oil, no smog checks and tune ups needed for the electric cars. The dealers are likely to concentrate on that which will give them more profit and that is the gasoline cars leaving Tesla with minimal sales. Nonetheless, the franchise automobile dealers in New Jersey have a defense that justifies their opposition to the direct sales by Tesla and this is anchored on legislation. The dealers managed to cut a backroom deal with the governor that put in place a legislation prohibiting the direct sale of the cars by Tesla to the consumers. Despite the justifications that favor the direct sales by Tesla, the legislation that is already in place must be adhered to. Nevertheless, this essay believes that wider consultations between the two parties should take place to ensure the issues raised are ironed out.
