Recent orders
Price analysis for the navigation system
Price analysis for the navigation system
Name
Professor
Course
Institution
Date
VectorCal Navigation systems use a pricing strategy that entails to the business intention to ensuring they primarily recuperate the cost of operation by focusing on reaching a specific set of target margins, so that the company remains relevant in the perfect competitive market (Rajasekaran & Lalitha, 2011). Pricing methods generally focus on the commoditization process hence to ensure that the new company meets customer satisfaction as the core principle; the company will use a value-based pricing approach. Cost classification is equally important in implementation of the pricing strategy. The company primarily depends on the decision making process to successfully achieve business goals. The manager who is a previous VectorCal executive in conjunction with the other executives will affect the cost of production by directly playing the part of issuing directives that determine acquisition of resources to necessitate the production process.
The exception of uncontrollable costs will be factored into the price of the product in consideration of dynamism of the navigation system market (Jagolinzer, 2000). Due to the variable cost of production of the navigation drones, cost will fall under “control ability” classification. The application of “cost ability” cost classification is justified by nature of the perfect competitive market ensuring the business realise profit in the long-run considering that it is new with relatively the same cost obligations such as taxes and tariffs required of other businesses (Jagolinzer, 2000).
Cost is generally the expense that company will incur to accomplish tasks set by the business objectives (Rajasekaran & Lalitha, 2011). The different characteristics of cost all play a part to the successful transition of the business after completion of the start-up phase. Reasonable cost refers to referencing cost incurred to the normality another company undertaking a similar objective would incur if the circumstances were similar in all perspectives (Murphy, 2009).
Reasonable costs the company will incur will be a reference of costs other existing companies incur including VectorCal to accomplish production objectives. An average of the costs determined will formulate a reasonable estimate for production costs (Murphy, 2009). Reasonable cost will include salaries for management, labour and raw materials to ensure that the company does not over pay or underpay but rather find a point of balance equitable to that of other companies and conducive for the business transition phase. Allowable cost refers to costs set by company principles to manage business proceedings so that company policies remain effective and cost of operation remains manageable (Murphy, 2009). Allowable costs determined by company include miscellaneous expenses, office supplies and meals. Allocable cost refers to dynamic costs that the company can revise periodically through analysis of factors such as benefits received to the company through an activity (Murphy, 2009). The company allocable costs will be a reference to performance of employees where salaries will be liable for increment in reference to performance. Activities of production directly increasing company recognition and profit such as advertising will also have an allocable cost estimate basis. Variable cost entails to the different cost that the company will incur to accomplish specific objectives in production output while fixed cost includes cost that remain unchanged irrespective of change in production output (Rajasekaran & Lalitha, 2011). Variable cost includes direct labour procured to accomplish tasks such as system update in the company while fixed costs include lease on company premises. A mix of variable and fixed cost results in semi-variable cost (Rajasekaran & Lalitha, 2011). An example of this cost is labour where employees receive a predetermined amount for working hours while also receiving a variable amount for extra working hours.
The purchase of any good or service is subject to price analysis and the most important part this analysis is verification of this price (Compton, 2010). The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) has set forth a number of regulation methods to determine and analyse the price of a product or service that used enable companies determine optimal prices (Compton, 2010). Considering the competitive nature of the navigation system business between the new company and VectorCal, then the pricing analysis method to use will need to consider comprehensively this factor in determining the necessary pricing. Therefore, to ensure that a conclusive analysis is obtained, the best pricing analysis method relevant to this scenario is “comparison of competitive bids analysis method”. This is the best method to validate price of product for new companies through analysis of already existing companies that offer the same product or service. Through “comparison of competitive bids analysis method”, a reasonable conclusion to the price that a company can charge for a product can be determined.
The analysis method focuses on the total cost of acquisition to for comparison basis since the lowest bid does not necessarily represent the lowest cost of a product (Compton, 2010). By using the total cost of acquisition, variables such as cost of redesign cost and testing cost are factored into the analysis process to match a product standard to applicability irrespective of the cost of the product. This method ensures that the competitive nature of the two companies is considered in reference to the standard and quality of the two products.
Reference
Compton, P. B. (2010). Federal acquisition: Key issues and guidance. Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.
Jagolinzer, P. (2000). Cost accounting: An introduction to cost management systems. Australia: South-Western College Pub.
Murphy, J. E. (2009). Guide to contract pricing: Cost and price analysis for contractors, subcontractors, and government agencies. Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.
Rajasekaran, V., & Lalitha, R. (2011). Cost accounting. Delhi: Pearson.
Prewriting. Environmental Conservation
Name
Lecturer
Course
Date
Prewriting
Environmental Conservation
My main focus is to produce a well researched piece that will address the challenges facing environment as a result of the persistent anthropological degradations. This will be achieved by carrying out an intensive research before coming up with well thought feasible recommendations to the concerned authorities.
Sources
Diamandis, P. & Steven, K. Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think. New
York: Free Press. 2012. Print.
This book was published to sensitize the readers on environmental education. Apart from informing them on the current situation, it asserts that the future can be improved if environmental conservation is prioritized.
Ruppeto, R. The Forest for the Trees?: Government Policies and the Misuse of Forest
Resources. Massachusetts: Dinsmore Books. 2009. Print.
This book highlights the important roles of forests in the environment. Moreover, it goes ahead to explain that these resources have been misused in the past. Therefore, it should be the role of the government to formulate stringent policies to curb indiscriminate logging.
Shabecoff, P. Earth Rising: American Environmentalism In The 21St Century. Nevada:
Wombat Book Company, LLC. 2004. Print.
In this book, Shabecoff educates readers on how mankind can use technology to improve the lives of others. Even if the world has become so competitive, individuals should unite and make contributions that will transform the entire biodiversity.
Questions to be Answered
Define environmental ethics. Do you think it should be applied as part of Corporate Social Responsibility (SCR) by the business community?
State and explain five contributions of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) in creating a green economy.
In your opinion, what are some of the major impacts of global warming in the world today?
Define carbon trading. How effective has it impacted on the countries of the third world?
List six mitigation measures to environmental pollution.
The Free Press Crisis of 1800 Thomas Coopers Trial for Seditious Libel
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Year
The Free Press Crisis of 1800: Thomas Cooper’s Trial for Seditious Libel
Thomas Cooper and the Revolution of the free Press Crisis of 1800 discuss an influential Sedition Act of 1978 that was introduced in order to suppress Republican support of imposed fines, imprisonment as well as French revolutionaries. This paper thus puts in the picture the boundaries of American nationhood, both in the conventional international context and by exploring hierarchies and distinctions within republican society and political entity.
Discussion
Horn is of the opinion that, a more extensive line of attack into the revolution of 1800 enables people to provide a more complicated and distinct answer to the question of revolutionary credentials. To a great extent, The Free Press Crisis of 1800 depended on who you were and who or what you stood for. There was the bitterly contested presidential election of almost two hundred years in the midst of another hotly contested presidential election, the outcome of which was still in the balance, or, to be more precise, was still in the courts. Also, within this period, it was so unpopular that statutory restrictions on free writing and speaking were imposed again for more than one hundred years. Many newspapers made extremely violent attacks upon the government and the conduct of the war and a great political party raised an issue at a presidential election that the war was a failure. The same reaction in the time of the time of the French Revolution which was behind the Sedition Act led to contemporary prosecutions for sedition in England. Before the agitation for reform of Parliament and complaints as to abuses in public office led to a long series of prosecutions for Seditious libel which, as the case (32).
Cooper’s trial took place on April 19, and he served as his own counsel. Most of his efforts, like those of prosecuting attorney Rawle, focused on Cooper’s intent and the nature of his charges, as was appropriate in a trial for Seditious Libel. Surrounding these arguments, however, was the logic and language of honor (Horn 93). Cooper, for instance, appealed to the jury by touching on their natural concern for their character and reputation. Since Cooper owed their offices to President Adams, he ensured he defended himself to the latter. The judges and district attorney trying his case would doubtlessly be biased against him. However, members of the jury, had no ties to President Adams, and therefore would undoubtedly remain unbiased, for they had some characters to support and some to character to lose. They would therefore abide by their own sworn oaths of impartiality.
With regard to the case, the juxtaposition of democracy and race in his subtitle, Oliver Wendall Holmes, is not intended to discount, diminish, or deconstruct the former term by putting the latter in the foreground, but sets the tone with his careful study of the range of possible outcomes. Again, overstress upon this public interest has led to restrictions upon the individual interest in free association with others. It has often been felt that the state was endangered by the growth of powerful organizations had, which, therefore could overshadow or dominate the latter. They seem to inhere in repressive legislation which sees only the interest of the state as personifying politically organized society. In addition, there would have been no crisis if the presidency had not come to be so overwhelmingly important (Horn 67).
Work Cited
Horn, James. The Revolution of 1800: Democracy, Race, and the New Republic. Charlottesville [u.a.: Univ. of Virginia Press, 2002. Print.