Recent orders
Pepperdine University Admission Essay
(Name)
(Instructors’ name)
(Course)
(Date)
Pepperdine University Admission Essay
I believe that Pepperdine University has the best interests of its students as it is a Christian university. According to the mission statement at Pepperdine University, students are meant to uphold strict Christian values. Moreover, one should at the same time strive towards achieving academic excellence of the highest standards (Pepperdine University, 2011.1). This means that as a student, one should act in a Christian like manner in all aspects of campus life. It also means believing in the Christian faith will living a life, which is productive, as well as thoughtful. Furthermore, one should always ensure that service and leadership is conducted in a Christian manner (Ross, 2000.34). There are many ways through, which the world can be influenced by knowledgeable actions that I will undertake. I will attempt to make sure that I develop my faith, and that of my peers. This will be done without infringing on their rights or personal privacy. Moreover, the inquiry and ideas expressed by others will not be ignored, but rather viewed positively. The church as well as the society will be enhanced by my actions.
Some of the qualities that I seek to enhance includes spreading of wisdom and knowledge. This will be through being a role model, who will be emulated by all those who know and hear about me. I have a role, which is formative in the university, but this should not be in the light of a secular life. Many people will be inspired by the Christian engagement, which I will always have. The Bible will be my companion and it will be my guide while learning at the university. It will serve as my inspiration as it has valuable information regarding life and faith of Christians. My personal transformation at the university will be due to the biblical principles that I follow. In turn, I will always seek to inspire other human beings. The scriptures will enable me to develop, while at the same time acquire a Christian world view. Christian values are vital in the ethical actions and decisions that I will make. Furthermore, the environment is suitable for the formation of an excellent Christian. As part of the university’s mission, all aspects of campus life such as living, working and studying, will be centered on Christianity.
The values, which I have acquired in my life such as integrity, justice, compassion and caring, will be known to everyone. Also, it will be vital for me to ensure that the campus community does the same. Harmony, unity, respect, dignity and fairness are some of the ways, which I will treat others in campus (Harvard Independent, 2002. 45). This will ensure that the common mission of the university is effectively achieved. Learning is one of the main reasons why I have chosen to attend university. The fact that Pepper is a Christian university even makes me more motivated to learn and pass well in my examinations. The community will be assured of my help. It is through community service that I will make my service and purpose be known to everybody. Pepperdine University offers me the best and most suitable environment needed for becoming an exemplary Christian (Pepperdine University, 2011.1). Lastly, Pepperdine University is the best choice I have made concerning higher Christian learning in a Christian environment. This means that I will contribute to its service, learning, community faith as well as mission.
Work Cited
Ross, Kathy. Crafts for Christian Values. New York: Millbrook Press, 2000.Print.
Harvard Independent. 100 Successful College Application Essays. 2002. Print.
Pepperdine University. Mission, Vision and Affirmation Statements. Retrieved from HYPERLINK “http://www.pepperdine.edu/about/mission-vision/” http://www.pepperdine.edu/about/mission-vision/ January 2, 2012.
People Should Be Drug Tested Before Receiving a WelfareUnemployment Check
(Name)
(Instructors’ name)
(Course)
(Date)
People Should Be Drug Tested Before Receiving a Welfare/Unemployment Check
In a bid to drastically decrease the number of welfare rolls originating from the government and to make it increasingly difficult for struggling people and families to access government benefits, legislators and GOP governors have pushed mandatory laws that require applicants to take and pass drug tests. Not only do applicants of welfare have to take and pass these tests, they actually have to foot the bills for the tests, and will only be reimbursed by the government when they pass the test. After coming up with this law, the House of Representatives are thinking of making their vote and pushing to reauthorize insurance for unemployment dependent on a mandatory requirement for drug testing. The bill would require all the claimants of unemployment insurance to take and pass a drug test if they are identifies in the first screening tests as being possible drug users (Diamond 1). This essay, therefore, will take a stand arguing for the argument that people should take and pass a drug test before receiving government- sponsored welfare funds and unemployment checks or insurance.
There are numerous reasons as to why this article takes this stand. According to Nathan Deal, the Georgia governor, the state is doing the right thing requiring welfare applicants to pass drug tests. With the high number of individuals receiving welfare and unemployment benefits, the idea of entertaining drug tests on applicants before receiving any public funds is attractive. This is because this measure would make sure that future employees are ready for the field of work because numerous employers usually require drug tests to be carried out before handing out jobs. If an employer finds out that a potential employee is clean then they would be, more willing to offer them work (Fairley 1).
The governor from Georgia is not the only one in favor of the proposed law. Other people on the streets and social networks have expressed their opinions on the issue and have indicated that they are in agreement with what is being proposed by the lawmakers. One reason why many supporters of the legislation want the law to be practiced is that they feel that most unemployed individuals are more likely to use drugs than employed people are. Chemung Schuyler Steuben Workforce New York is a nonprofit organization job-training agency that deals with unemployed individuals. The agency argues that more than fifty percent of the workers in the area fail drug testing for pre- employment purposes. The agency added that the study only included a highly narrow type of employees (Johnson 1).
In the meantime, another survey carried out by the government called the national Survey on Drug Use and Health for 2010, which indicated that people who were unemployed were twice more likely to abuse drugs and other substances than those people who were permanent holders of a job. According to this survey, employed individuals were found to use drugs and other abusive substances 8.4 percent of the time when compared to not less than 17.5 percent of the time unemployed individuals abuse drugs and other substances (Johnson 1). This is a clear indication that there is a need for taking drug tests before receiving welfare and unemployment funds.
The essentiality of introducing this law is not only about protecting the government and public funds from being used in inappropriate ways, but it also has to do with protecting the welfare of the concerned individuals. Some states are considering implementing this mandatory drug-testing legislature for the benefit of the welfare recipients. Individuals in favor of this test argue that mandatory drug testing will be critical in helping those individuals with drug problems and those who need treatment and counseling to get rid of their addiction. In addition to helping, these individuals become better members of the society, the legislature will also help them become more qualified to keep and obtain better jobs. This is because more employers now are doing the same tests, which will disqualify a candidate immediately once they do not pass. As it follows, unlike what opponents of the legislature are arguing the law is extremely critical to the applicants as it prepares them for employment and rids them of addiction (Diamond 1).
The opponents of the law are basing their arguments on humanitarian grounds arguing that the legislature will be going against laws of humanity and compassion, and that the tests and the associated services will be extremely expensive, as they will require more money for follow-up services. However, there is better argument in requiring this test because as the studies show, more people who are unemployed and those who depend on welfare are more likely to depend on drugs than other individuals who have a more secure life. Giving money to such individuals would only lead to more l wastage of money because the state will be funding drug use most of the time (Diamond 1). These are the reasons why the paper takes a stand that people should take and pass a drug test before receiving government- sponsored welfare funds and unemployment checks or insurance.
Works cited
Diamond, Marie. ‘House Republicans May Mandate Drug Testing As Condition of Continuing Unemployment Benefits’. Think Process Justice. Web. 12 March 2012.
Fairley, Jessica. ‘Drug testing for Unemployment and Welfare benefits.’ Fox31Online. Web. 12 March 2012.
Johnson, James. ‘GOP Wants Mandatory Drug Testing for Unemployed’. The Inquisitr. Web. 12 March 2012.
Contemporary issues facing Singapore airlines limited.
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
Contemporary issues facing Singapore airlines limited.
Singapore airline (SIA) is an international company that offers flight services. It is owned by the government of Singapore but the public also has a stake in the company through ownership of shares. Its forerunner was the Malayan airways in 1947 which operated commercial flights linking Singapore and Kuala Lumpur (John and Williams, 2012, 189). The name changed to Malaysian Airways and later Malaysian-Singapore airlines. In the year 1972 the mother company, Malaysian-Singapore airline was split forming Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines. The airline offers both freight and passenger services to its customers. Singapore airline operates its main hub at the Changi airport.
The company has sixty two major destinations around the world in not less than thirty five countries. It mainly serves Africa, Asia, North America, Europe, pacific region and Middle East countries. The company has two subsidiaries that are the Silkair and the Singapore airlines cargo. Silkair manages flights to secondary cities which have a lesser capacity. Singapore airline cargo on the other hand manages cargo services offered by the mother company. It operates a fleet of airplanes including the airbus A380 which is currently the biggest passenger aircraft in the world (John and Williams, 2012, 190).
The airline is not only involved in offering flight services but also aircraft handling and engineering services. It is also a major shareholder in the virgin Atlantic, an airline in the United Kingdom. The company is characterized by efficient and excellent services to its customers. This has ensured its continued success in the flight industry. Its efforts have not gone unrewarded. The Singapore airline has won various awards including the Best Global Airline and the Best International Airline awards for several years (Shaw, 2011, 178). Its quality of service has ensured its survival in the flight services business and has earned it a lot of revenue. The company has hired more than thirty thousand workers and earns revenue of not less than three hundred million US dollars per annum.
Despite the continued success, the Singapore airline faces a batch of upcoming issues. These issues have yielded a tough working environment and reduced the capability of this company. However, various measures have been put in place to curb these issues and hence enhance on their performance. These contemporary issues are as discussed below.
One of the major issues of concern is management of this vast company. With its operation in different countries, the airline company has faced various managerial constraints. Speaking in a session, Future of tourism Asia, the executive vice president of the Singapore Airliner, Mak Swee Wah spoke of volatility and turbulence of the current world as one of the problems faced by the airline industry (. Various economic constraints in the world have repeatedly affected the airline’s performance. Despite the growth of the tourism and travel industry in Asia, where the company has majored its operations, the continued hike in fuel prices have increased the running costs (Dempsey and Gessell, 2006, 875). Economic challenges in the world which includes the economic crisis in Europe, the nuclear disaster in Japan, deteriorating economic growth in china and India have had a negative impact to the Singapore airline. Security issues are also a major threat to the airline industry (John and Williams, 2012, 193). The world has experienced a rise in cases of terror activities. This has resulted to added costs to the SIA as it has forced them to employ more sophisticated security methods.
The second contemporary issue is the upcoming legal issues. Various government regulations in Singapore and global rules pertaining to the airline industry have acted as a hindrance to their internal and international operations. Flight restrictions imposed on this airline by some countries which restrict the time and number of flights made has been a major setback. The rules also limit the number of destinations the airline covers. The lesser the number of destinations covered the lesser the profits and opportunities (Saxena, 2011, 674). Internally, the government of Singapore has enacted various laws which are affecting the internal operations of the SIA. Singapore being a geographically small country has to regulate the operations in the aviation industry to eliminate monopoly and maximize on revenues (Shaw, 2011, 247). These regulations have seen the Singapore airline experience a series of flight restrictions which have made the working environment unfriendly. The Australian government in a cabinet meeting of February 2006 failed to grant Singapore the fifth freedom of air which would have allowed them to access freely the Australian airspace (Wensveen, 2011, 343). This decision was meant to protect Australia’s Qantas airline from increased competition.
Infrastructure is another contemporary issue that is affecting the Airline. The company has channeled numerous funds towards acquiring the state of art equipment like airbuses. However, these purchases have confronted them with the issue of capacity in the airports. The modern flight equipment acquired requires modern infrastructural systems to go along with them (Gerant, 2007, 118). Some of the acquired aircrafts are calling for construction of new and modern radar stations and rehabilitation of the existing ones. The jumbo aircrafts require expanded runways and terminals.
The rapidly changing customers’ requirements and rapid competition yielded by existing and upcoming airlines is another contemporary issue affecting the Singapore airline. With the rise in number of airlines in the aviation industry, customers’ expectations of the quality of services provided have raised by a great deal (Gerant, 2007, 58). Competition among the various airlines has seen them better the customer service day in day out. The improvement of the services provided has opened up the mind of consumers of airline services. The competitive rivalry has resulted in both challenges and opportunities to this airline.
To overcome various hurdles on the way, the Singapore airline has embarked on a series of development strategies to ensure it thrives in the aviation industries. The Airline has joined an organization, the Star Alliance which brings together various airlines in the world. Various economies of scale have accrued to the company. The Star Alliance has enabled the Singapore airline to increase its destinations in the world. The government of Singapore has signed deregulation treaties with other countries for example with the US that is the Open Skies Treaty which allows unrestricted flight access for both countries (John and Williams, 2012, 103). Negotiations with the Australian government are also ongoing on the same.
To counter the competition from the other airlines, the Singapore airline has established a personal relationship with the customers through customer relationship management. They have also taken their level of customer service a notch higher by employing the modernized methods of service delivery. All aircrafts have four different classes. These classes are; economy, business, first and suite classes. Creation of these classes was in an effort to satisfy the travelling needs of different customers according to their financial ability (Seth and Wells, 2011, 576). The Singapore airline provides non-stop air services to its customers between Singapore and the USA. This benefits customers who require to travel in urgency or those who have less traveling time to long destinations.
Since its inception, the Singapore airline has undergone a series of developments in a bid to improve on the customer service. The company has over time been acquiring the latest technological and communication equipment in order to stay in line with the trends in the aviation industry. The airline has purchased state of art airplanes that enhance on comfort. On infrastructure, the company is expanding various structures like runways and terminals in their airports. This has played a role in increasing the capacity of the airports. A huge investment on human resources has been made by the company. The Singapore airline runs its training institute which recruits and trains staff at various levels (Shaw, 2011, 285). This ensures that their staff is competent and offers the best service to their customers. The company has strived to expand its destination coverage in all continents. Increment of destinations covered attracts more customers who require to frequently transverse numerous destinations for official or recreational purposes (John and Williams, 2012, 197).
All the measures stipulated above have been taken by this Airliner to counter the upcoming issues and ensuring it is in line with new trends in the aviation industry.
References
Dempsey, S. and Gesell, E. 2006. Airlines management. Auckland : Coast Aires publication Ltd
John, F. and Williams, G. 2012. Air transport in the 21st century. New York: Mac-Graw Hill.
Gerant, F. 2007. Management in the airline industry. London: Roultledge.
Shaw, S. 2011. Airline marketing and management. Farnham: Ashgate publishing ltd.
Seth, B. and Wells, A. 2011. Airport planning and management. New York: Mac-Graw Hill.
Saxena, R. 2010. Marketing management. New York: Mac-Graw Hill.
Wenseveen, G. 2011. Airline marketing and management. Farnham: Ashgate publishing ltd.