Recent orders

History of the American Economics

Name:

Instructor:

Course:

Date:

History of the American Economy

The great depression was a severe economic depression that was experienced globally in the 21st century. It is viewed as the deepest and the longest depression that ever occurred in the world. This economic tragedy resulted in several devastating effects in both poor and rich nations. The impacts of this economic adversity are a clear indication of how world economies can decline and fail. There are many factors that contributed occurrence of this economic problem. The aftermath of the great depression had consequences that were felt throughout the entire American community. It was a huge tragedy that caused the government of America to be fully involved in serious policy considerations and strategies (Gary and Hugh 54). As a result of the great depression of the early twentieth century, a great number of Americans were rendered jobless. Other things that characterized the great depression include; deflation in the prices of assets drops in the demand for credit facilities, and the ultimate disruption of trade.

It is almost an accepted consensus that the main cause of the great depression was the collapse of the stock market. The collapse of the stock market is also known as the black Tuesday by some. This was the pre World War II period, a time in history when there was an overflow in wealth (Gary and Hugh 99). The populace of the United States of America was highly optimistic of this post war period. There was also mass migration of persons from the rural areas into the cities of America. A vast majority of them came to find placement within the fast growing industrial sector at this point in the history of America (Berton, 67). The effect of these activities was a robust economy in the United States of America. This however meant that the productivity of the rural areas which is mostly agricultural based be brought to a halt. There emerged a situation where the farmers in the rural areas could not get sufficient supply of labor and not enough attention was being put on the agricultural sector (Gary and Hugh 77). Pursuant to these, the stock market started taking a southward trajectory, a factor which is an attributed as the cause of the great depression in the United States of America.

The foregone however can seldom get to the root of the explanation of the great depression in the United States of America. The cause of this depression is an issue that has dominated historical discourse for a while now. There has been the emergence of an assortment of schools of thought as to what were the reasons for the occurrence of the great depression in the Americas (Berton, 67). There are many scholars who talk about the causes of the great depressions. The great depression was caused by under consumption together with over-investment that caused a bubble in the economy. As a result, Deflation and panic then set in and many people thought that further loses could be avoided by avoiding the market thus keeping off (Gary and Hugh 55). The holding onto money and resources led to the drop in amount that exhibited the drop in demand thus being a root cause of the great depression.

The great was as a consequence of ordinary recession; only that monetary authority had many policy mistakes that caused a reduction in the supply of money and resources which were of great exacerbation to the economic situation in the post war period the recession leading to the occurrence of the great depression. This view was inclined to the thought that had it not been for the mistakes of players within the monetary authorities to reduce the supply of cash, then the recession would not have developed into the great depression, a phenomenon that negatively affected the entire economy of the United states of America negatively (Berton, 44).

Thought the foregone are the key theoretical underpinnings on the cause of the great depression in the United States of America. A range of market policies that were imposed account for the great depression in the United States of America. A subjective thought of individuals at the micro economical level influence all economic phenomena, the great depression ipso factor individual thought and action can influence the economy at a macro level (Gary and Hugh 78-9).

The great depression was also said to be a result of the inherent instability of the capital model in the United States of America. Capitalism is an economic model where there is ownership of the means of production by private owners. These private owners have their sole objective in the maximization of profits in any given enterprise. Capitalism is characterized by capitalistic accumulation of the market and wage labor. The market environment in a capitalistic system is almost free for all with very minimal government interference and regulation. The debt deflation is a situation where the debt bubble bursts (Berton, 87). The result is a situation where we have debt liquidation. In the period of the great depression in the United States of America, the gross domestic product of the United States reached to an all time high of three hundred percent. The capitalists all took to debts in order to finance their investments thus deflating the system. There was there for increased commodity supply leading to a fall in profits and trade outputs as a whole (Gary and Hugh 44). Consequently there was the emergence of the great depression in the United States of America in the early twentieth century.

Another argument was that there was the growth of disparities in wealth between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat classes in the United States of America. This led to diminished purchasing power. The proletariat who are the majority are expected to be the consumers, capitalism ensures that this group does not have enough even for subsistence. This over time leads to a drop in the purchasing power of a people. The other way to look at it was that the owners of the means of production became even richer and in bid to protect their status they further produced (Berton, 66). Though the production increased, the target market, which is mostly comprised of the proletariat class did not have enough purchasing power. This situation is what led to the great depressions in the United States of America according to this group of scholars.

Protectionism is also another concept that can be attributed to the causation of the great depression in the United States of America in the early twentieth century. Many countries in this period adopted protectionist policies. These were policies put by governments of countries to ensure that the citizens give priority to consumption of what is locally produced. Government’s world over put in place policies that ensured they imported very little, instead they could consume what was produced locally within the countries. This only served to hurt the economy of the United States of America as their surplus goods could not be sold to other countries, thanks to the paradigm of the protectionist policies adopted by players within the world market systems at the time (Gary and Hugh 43).

Compounded, the fore gone theories are explanations into the causation of the great depression that was experienced in the United States of America in the early twentieth century. Having looked at the causes of the great depression, the other questions that needs ramification is that of the duration of the great depression. What are the factors that led to the prolonged period in the great depression?

Factors for the prolonged great depression

In a bid to end the great depression in the United States of America, the government put in place policies that would alleviate this situation. The goal of these policies (referred to in some quarters as the new deal) was to get more and more Americans back to work. Instead of helping to alleviate the impacts of the great depression on the economy of the United States of America, the policies ended up working to the contrary. They only served to sustain the great depression that was being experienced. These policies included the following; increasing the social security net via social security, unemployment benefits, and setting up of deposit and insurance exchange commission (Berton, 77). Social security meant protection of vulnerable groups in the American society. There was also put in place a policy that would ensure benefits for persons who were unemployed, due to the great depression the level of unemployment at the time was very high. Further there was the establishment of the deposit and insurance commission. The setting up of deposit and insurance exchange commission was detrimental to the match towards the end of the great depression (Gary and Hugh 54-9). It put in place rules that suppressed competition and also set up recommended wages that were above the expected levels. This only served to continue the great depression.

There was then the National industrial Recovery plan; this policy allowed industries to raise prices of products on condition that they share their monopoly rents with workers. This in essence meant higher wages. Wage hikes only served to ensure job losses in the industrial and production sector. This was being done at the expense of driving industrial growth. Amalgamated, these measures put in place by the government of the United States of America in the time only served to make the depression worse (Berton, 88). Most of the policies were not well thought out a situation that only served to exacerbate the great depression in the United States of America in the early twentieth century.

Conclusion

Having discussed, the theories of the causation of the great depression in the United States of America and the reasons for its elongation thereof, it is only prudent that the current students of the historical and economical discourse learn from the undoing of the past. This is a sure way of cushioning economies of in the present day world market system from the great depression like depressions.

Works Cited

Berton, Pierre. The Great Depression 1929-1939. Toronto: Anchor Canada, 2001. Print.

Gary M. Walton and Hugh Rockoff. History of the American Economy. 12th ed. 2012 ISBN-13: 978-1-111-82292-7

Conflict in ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been’

Subject

Students Name

Institution of Affiliation

Date

Conflict in ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been’

In her story ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been’, Joyce Oates uses a lot of ironical texts as a mockery among the characters that are protagonists and antagonists. Connie is the protagonist in the story, a girl who at the age of 15 years had more problems than any other person in the story. She strived on her looks, boys and her friends to whom she used to look directly to affirm that her face was alright. Connie received less attention from her family, and therefore she sought attention from others. Connie has had various conflicts with her antagonists, Connie’s mother is one of the antagonists, and they have an external conflict.

Connie’s mother is tired of her daughter’s behavior and often scolded her for looking onto the faces of others. It is ironical that Connie’s mother makes negative comments to her daughter in an attempt to calm Connie’s behavior. She says “Stop gawking yourself. Who are you? You think you’re so pretty?” (Pg. 453) Being against her daughter and scolding her is a sign that she is an antagonist opposed to her daughter about the strong urge of getting attention to her looks. They therefore despite being a family engage in an external conflict on looks. The comments made by Connie’s mother are ironical in that, she was once pretty at her younger age and at her time prettiness was everything, but as her looks were gone, she was kind of jealous of her daughter who at her young age is pretty.

Connie is struck between an internal and external conflict that has been resulted from her friend Arnold. Arnold is the major antagonist in the story and is willing to provide the much needed sexual attention to Connie. Connie was a girl who was in dire interest to explore her sexuality and thus she wants men to find her attractiveness and desire her. Arnold gets to fall in love with Connie, though it does not begin as a conflict, but as a reciprocation of the desire for attention and notoriety. Arnold becomes so emboldened with his advance to Connie and his desires to have Connie is so strong. It is here that the two types of conflict arise, both internal and external.

Connie has been having a deep desire for attention to men, and this leads her to have issues with her mother. Despite this, she continues with her explorative nature on men, and this is here her friend Ellie introduces her to Arnold. Arnold wants Connie so badly, and he goes an extra mile, he goes to Connie’s home. Despite having the deep desire on men, Connie ironically decides that she doesn’t want Arnold terming him as not being the type either. She decides to turn them off telling them that they have to go away. The two men refuses to go saying that they can’t leave without her since they had come to take a ride with Connie since it was on a Sunday. Arnold says, “We ain’t leaving until you come with us” (Pg. 460) implying that Connie had decided not to go out with them.

Connie gets herself into internal conflict, she really needs men but at this time, she no longer needs them, and she wants to send them away. He is not fascinated with the looks of the men that she is to go out with and this divides her heart. The men whom she is dealing with seem to be much old but wants to look younger far much than they are. And this leads to the development of the external conflict between Arnold and Connie especially when they threaten to harm her family; this is more of irony as what was once a willing bargain has turned to be a forceful one.

Work Cited

Joyce Oates ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been’. Pages 453-466.

Data-Exercise-1 Expenditures Approach to Calculating GDP

Data Exercise 1Insert Name

ECON 201Insert Date

Submitted to: Prof.Data Exercise 1In any country, Gross Domestic Product is the economic measure of the overall market value of all the final goods produced within a country during a given year.

Expenditures Approach to Calculating GDP

In the calculation of Gross Domestic Product, there are mainly two approaches which are employed. These approaches include the expenditure approach and the income approach to calculation of Gross Domestic Product. There are different components which compose the expenditure approach of calculating GDP.

GDP = C + Ig + G + (X-M)

Where,

GDP is gross domestic product

C is consumption

Ig is the investment

G is government expenditure

(X-M) is the net exports obtained from subtracting the imports of a country from exports.

Income approach of GDP

The second approach of the calculating Gross Domestic Product is the income approach. In this method, economists calculate the GDP through the addition of all the accrued earnings in a particular year. This approach is composed of 10 factors which include compensation of employees, rents, interests, proprietor’s income, corporate income taxes, dividends, undistributed corporate profits, indirect business taxes, consumption of fixed capital and net foreign factor income.

The factors are explained below:

compensation of employees:

This factor includes wages; salaries paid by companies and the government to employees; benefits; supplements; and payments by employers to Social Security and other health and pension funds.

Rents

This is a factor which covers payments received by landlords for supplying property.

interest

This consists of payments made by private businesses to moneylenders, as well as of earnings obtained by households on corporate bonds, certificates of deposit (CDs), and savings deposits.

Proprietors’ income

Proprietor’s income is the net income received by sole proprietorships, partnerships, and cooperatives during a year.

Corporate income taxes

Corporate taxes cover taxes paid by corporations to the government.

Dividends

These are the parts of corporate net income paid to shareholders.

Undistributed corporate profits

They are also referred to as retained earnings, which are corporate profits that have been retained and reinvested in the corporation.

The summation of all the above factors gives the figure for national income. This is the total income earned through the use of a country’s resources, whether in that country or abroad.

The other factors which must be added in order for us to come up with the Gross Domestic Product include the following:

Indirect business taxes

This includes sales, excise, and property taxes; license fees; and customs duties.

Consumption of fixed capital which is also referred to as depreciation.

Net foreign factor income which is referred to as the total earnings of foreigners inside the United States minus the income earned by Americans outside the country.

GDP In different countries

As seen from the reading in chapter 6, Gross Domestic Product is useful as a measure of the economic welfare or standards of living in the different countries. When comparing the GDP of different nations, there are factors which must be considered. First, the GDP of a country is measured using its own currency. For that matter, the comparison of the GDP of two countries calls for the conversion of currency so that we use a common currency for calculation.

Conversion of currencies with exchange rates

Comparison of GDP of countries with different currencies needs the conversion to a common denominator with the use of an exchange rate. This represents the value of a given currency in terms of another. There are two types of exchange rates which are market exchange rates and purchasing power parity denoted as PPP equivalent exchange rates. PPP-equivalent exchange rates are used for cross country comparison of GDP

Different countries have different values of Gross Domestic Product. In this section, we shall look at the different nations and their GDPs. For example, let us look at the GDP of the United States as it was posted in 2012.

The total GDP was 16.2 trillion dollars. Consumption accounted for 68.6% of the total GDP, investment accounted for 15.2%, and government expenditure took 19.5% of the total GDP while exports accounted for 13.5%. Imports accounted for 16.9%. This shows that as at 2012, the net exports were negative.

In terms of production, the total GDP of the United States was 16.3 trillion dollars. Nondurable goods accounted for $4.7 trillion, which about 29.1%. Services carried $7.6 trillion dollars which is about 46.7percent. Structures on the other hand accounted for 1.2 trillion dollars and this is about 7.2 percent while durable goods and change in inventories accounted for 16.6 percent and 0.4 percent respectively.

Another country whose Gross Domestic Product we can analyze is Brazil. It was estimated to be 2.33 trillion dollars in 2012. It can be broken down as follows:

Household consumption took 62.3 percent of the total GDP while government expenditure was 21.5 %. Investment took 18.1%. Exports accounted for 12.6 percent and lastly imports were -14 percent. This shows that the net exports brought a negative figure.

The table below shows the different GDPs for different countries as per 2012

Country GDP in billions of domestic currency Domestic currency/ US dollars(PPP equivalent) GDP in USD (billions)

Brazil 4403 Reals 1.869 2356

Canada 1818 Dollars 1.221 1488

China 51932 Yuan 4.186 12406

Egypt 1542 Pounds 2.856 540

Germany 2644 Euros 0.827 3197

India 97514 Rupees 20.817 4684

Japan 475868 Yen 102.826 4628

Mexico 15502 Pesos 8.813 1759

South Korea 1302128 won 806.81 1614

United Kingdom 1539 Pounds 0.659 2336

United States 16245 dollars 1.00 16245

Index of Economic Freedom

Index of Economic Freedom is a system of ranking which arranges countries or states based on the number and the intensity of government involvement, influence and regulations on wealth-creating activity. Simply put, it is the measure of how the government controls business activities.

Among the free economies include Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Switzerland, New Zealand and Canada. United States is ranked 12th with 75.5.

Among the repressed economies, we have North Korea, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Eritrea and Iran among other states (The Heritage Foundation, 2014).

References

The Heritage Foundation (2014). Country ranking. Retrieved from: http://www.heritage.org/ on: 21st January, 2015.

Xu, X. (2004). China’s gross domestic product estimation. China Economic Review, 15(3), 302-322.