Recent orders

Heteronormativity

Student’s name

Professor

Course

Date

Heteronormativity

Question one

Yep defines heteronormativity simply as the assumption that heterosexuality is the norm and everything else is, by default, deviant. This includes assumptions like straight people are normal while gay people are abnormal or queer. Examples of heteronormativity can be seen in institutions such as marriage because institutionalized monogamy expects heterosexuality. Heteronormativity also does violence to LGBTQI+ communities who often feel pressured to pursue heteronormative relationships because they are not valued as much by society even though they have equal rights when it comes to having relationships with whoever they choose (Yep,15).

Love and friendship may begin to undo the harms of heteronormativity by making diversity more visible and celebrated. Other people who are not heterosexual may see that love is possible for them, which would allow them to feel more comfortable with their sexuality and may encourage them to come out to others. By being aware of the existence of diversity, it “forces” individuals to recognize they do not know anything about these people’s lives, which can inspire curiosity, empathy, and compassion (Yep, 18).

Question two

Anzaldúa’s critique of the term lesbian suggests that she feels the term only speaks to white, cisgender lesbians and excludes those of different races or genders. She suggests that there should be a new word created in addition to lesbian, one which will speak to other experiences of sexuality. Anzaldúa uses her own experience as an example of what this word could be: a boricua/latina lesbian looking for meaning and purpose within her identity while also trying to navigate a largely white, heteronormative world. Anzaldúa shares how she became invested in Latinidad as part of her search for meaning and purpose, an identity which is still under construction but includes many facets such as race gender and class interactions (Anzaldúa, 264).

She explains that this oftentimes leads to women coming together solely because they are both women and then withdrawing from men, rather than creating a space where men can also be involved in their cause. Anzaldúa suggests that these polarizations are a product of white American feminists moving away from their own identities while they attempt to erase others differences or mark them as negative. Anzaldúa names herself a survival tactic, in the face of colonization and neo-colonization, in the way she explores her own identity and how she navigates Latinidad, sexuality and race. She also describes how these intersections of identity affect not only her, but all women who exist within a heteronormative society (Anzaldúa, 268).

She says that race gender and class interact in queerness in a way which, like patriarchy, limits their ability to be themselves. Anzaldúa explores the experience of queerness in relation to race and class within her personal experience, as well as in a more theoretical way. Anzaldúa uses her own life to put forward how queerness can be analyzed by race and class theory in order to analyze not only the experiences of queer women but also those of lesbians and gays who are outside of this community (Anzaldúa, 271).

Work Cited

Anzaldúa, Gloria. “To (o) Queer the Writer—Loca, escritora y chicana.” Living chicana theory (1991): 263-76.

Yep, G. A. (2003). The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, and queer world-making. Journal of homosexuality, 45(2-4), 11-59.

analyze a concrete piece of legislation

Student’s Name

Instructor’s Name

Course Tittle

Date

Introduction

This paper seeks to analyze a concrete piece of legislation from the segregation or apartheid era. It studies a historical document and discusses what the apartheid state did and how its actions were designed to affect different people living in South Africa. Apartheid which is also known as separateness or apartness in the Dutch or Afrikaans signifies the designation that was given to the course of action of separating individuals by race, with regard to where they schooled, lived, worked, and died. It was a policy that was introduced in South Africa in 1948 by the National Party government and t remained functional until 1994. The apartheid policy governed associations between South Africa’s non-white majority and white minority and allowed racial segregation, economic and political discrimination against nonwhites (Clarke and William, 2). The rise and fall of Apartheid give a comprehensive, conversant, and clear overview of the major subjects with reference to apartheid South Africa, its establishment, development, and eventually its end. It provides a quick and enlightening entry point for those who are not much familiar with South African history, covering a wide-ranging outline of key societal, economic, and political issues. It gives an analytical and accessible understanding of apartheid South Africa. The system of racial discrimination in South Africa was executed and enforced by several acts and other laws. The legislation functioned to institutionalize racial segregation and the supremacy of white individuals over persons of other races.

Analysis

The Rise and Fall of Apartheid scrutinize the history of South Africa from 1948 to the contemporary day, covering the commencement of the unjust policy when the Nationalists came to authority, its rising opposition in the 1970s and 1980s, its ultimate failure in the 1990s, and its legacy up to the current days. Apartheid was produced by Hendrik Verwoerd. He is normally referred to as the architect of apartheid for his part in influencing the execution of apartheid policy when he was a minister of native affairs and at that time prime minister. He once described apartheid as the policy of neighborliness. Apartheid policies prohibited black individuals in South Africa from entering urban areas without immediately getting a job (Clarke and William, 8). It was unlawful for someone who was black not to carry a passbook. They could also not walk down the aisle with white people. Whereas the majority of this legislation was passed after the election of the National party, it was led by discriminatory legislation sanctioned under earlier Afrikaner and British governments (Clarke and William, 15). World War II resulted in increasing economic problems in South Africa and influenced the government to reinforce its policies of racial segregation. In 1948, the Afrikaner National Party succeeded in the general election under the watchword “apartheid.” The Afrikaner nationalism renowned within a framework of increasing secondary industrialization and urbanization during the period between the two world wars, in addition to the ongoing British imperial influence in South Africa.

Many rules were passed in the formation of the apartheid nation. A number of them include the Population Registration Act, suppression of Communism Act, Bantu Education Act /Bantu Authorities Act, pass laws, Sexual apartheid among many others. For instance, when talking about the promotion of the Bantu Self-Government Act 1959, it asserted that dissimilar ethnic groups had to dwell in different regions. Just a small fraction of South Africa was left for the black individuals to make their dwellings. This law as well got rid of black spots inside white regions by moving them out of the city. Well-recognized eliminations were those in Lady Selborne, District 6, and Sophia town. As an alternative, the black individuals were put in settlements outside of the township in a way that they could not possess properties there, only rental since the land could only be possessed by white individuals. This act triggered a lot of resentment and hardship. Black people lost their dwellings, others were removed from the property they possessed for numerous years, and were placed in underdeveloped places far away from their employment places. This act made the separate places of South Africa in which affiliates of each race could dwell and work, classically putting aside the best agricultural, and, and urban places for the whites.

The Bantu Self-Governing Act restricted occupying property or renting in the places well-thought-out as white regions except when they have acquired approval from the government. The institution of the Bantu Self-Government Act of 1950 made the Bantustans for the black individuals depending on their ethnic groups. They were stripped of their rights to participate in the national government of South Africa when the Bantu Authorities Act was made. Sanctioned in 1951, the Bantu Authorities Act generated a foundation for the ethnic regime in African reserves, called the “homelands.” They were initiated by the state government to function as independent states. Black individuals were assigned to a homeland on their tribal groupings according to their record of origin. The laws were so tough to a place that black individuals needed passports to enter South Africa, the land that had previously been their country of citizenship. 

Conclusion

The apartheid in South Africa came to an end through a series of negotiations between 1990 and 1993 and also unilateral stages by the de Klerk government. Outside protest and pressure at home eventually convinced the head of state to end apartheid. In 1990, he lifted the prohibition on the ANC and released Mandela. De Klerk and Mandela put efforts to bring to end apartheid which culminated in the 1994 multiracial general election whereby Nelson Mandela won and became the president. 

Works Cited

Clark, Nancy L., and William H. Worger. South Africa: The rise and fall of apartheid. Routledge, 2016.

Analytical Paper

Analytical Paper Outline Template

When you write an analytical paper, your paper focuses on developing a nuanced interpretation of a particular work. Each paragraph should further that interpretation and must relate directly back to your thesis statement from your introduction paragraph.

For this assignment, you will develop an outline for your analytical paper. An outline is meant to help you organize your points. Think of it as a skeleton that you will “flesh out” when you write your paper. The more detail you include in the outline, the more likely you will develop a strong paper. Further directions below:

You need to use a formal outline format; use the outline template provided below to help structure your outline.

You must write full sentences for the thesis statement, the topic/transition sentences, the passages, and the restatement of thesis. Note: The passages will be direct quotes from the text, so include quotation marks and a citation in APA style.

Do not include any information from research yet. You first want to make sure that you have enough evidence from the text itself to defend your thesis.

How to use the outline template: Erase each line before typing into the space. You may add or delete supporting points or details. To add, simply place your cursor at the end of a line, hit Enter, and you will see a new number or letter appear. To delete, simply highlight the line and hit Delete or Backspace.

Introduction

Background info: ___________________________________________________

Background info: ___________________________________________________

Background info: ___________________________________________________

Thesis statement: ___________________________________________________

Body Paragraph 1

Topic sentence: ____________________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

Body Paragraph 2

Topic/transition sentence: ____________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

Body Paragraph 3

Topic/transition sentence: ____________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

Body Paragraph 4

Topic/transition sentence: ____________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

passage: ____________________________________________________

interpretation: __________________________________________

Conclusion

Restatement of thesis: _______________________________________________

So what? Address the wider implications of your interpretation:

____________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________