Recent orders

Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s Disease

Judith Tunney

Dr. Samuelsen

BIO322

April 29th 2019

Many diseases affect the brain; we also have disorders that affect the brain and the nervous system. Dementia is a common symptom of brain diseases. Dementia is the loss of mental functions such as thinking, memory, and reasoning that is severe enough to interfere with a person’s daily functioning such as paying bills. Dementia is a group of symptoms that are caused by various diseases or conditions. Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of progressive dementia. Alzheimer’s Disease is a condition that affects the brain by destroying the brain memory slowly, affecting thinking ability and with time the patient then gets to a state where performing simple tasks becomes a big problem. It is hard for a patient to notice that they are developing the Alzheimer disease since it starts as a simple memory loss and with time the patient then develops dementia. It progresses slowly, to a point where the affected person finds it hard to think and remember things and eventually cannot remember the basic information that a three-year-old child can remember. Mild cognitive impairment can also result in Alzheimer since it is at an intermediate stage between cognitive impairment and the dementia stage which is common among the elderly. Cognitive impairment leads to dementia, and after some years Alzheimer then arises (Winblad, et al., 2016)

Much research has been done to understand the root causes of Alzheimer disease but there is no detailed information to be learned. Scientific studies in existence have only established that the disease develops in stages as stated above. Alois Alzheimer first described the disease in 1907. According to him, presenile dementia, cognitive impairment, the existence of senile and neurofibrillary tangles has been defined as the key features and the tracking factors that can help in diagnosing a patient with Alzheimer (Armstrong, 2013). These features are now regarded as the clinical pathological features of the disease that is affecting the brain. There have been reasons speculated since 1907 about the disease and they include acceleration of aging. There is an age-related reduced brain capacity; thus when one ages very fast the brain capacity tends to reduce more quickly. This has never been shown scientifically. Thus it remains a theory. Also, some argue that degeneration of anatomical pathways reduces one’s ability to think and as days go by one loses his memory and eventually he or she is diagnosed with Alzheimer. Studies in the 1980s showed that there are losses in acetylcholine in the brain reducing one’s ability to think (Armstrong, 2013). Degeneration of one’s anatomical pathway comes as a result of reduced cholinergic system inters affecting the neural network thus resulting in memory loss cases. Another cause is linked to genetics where one may be a carrier or has the Alzheimer disease allele and passes it to the unborn child who then experiences the symptoms as he or she grows.

Despite the lack of scientific proof on the exact cause of Alzheimer disease, scientists have linked it to the core brain proteins which at one-point fail to work normally. Abnormal functioning of these core proteins then affects the operations of the brain releasing a series of toxic events (Lin et al., 2018). The neurons get damaged and end up losing connection to each other in return causing damage to the memory of the brain. This process is said to begin years before the signs of Alzheimer disease start to manifest. The region of the brain, which controls memory, is the one that gets damaged first before the loss of neurons spreads to other parts of the brain. Since the signs are hardly felt at an early stage when the memory part of the brain is completely destroyed, then the brain shrinks significantly, and one’s memory is damaged.

The two proteins linked to dementia are plaques and tangles. Plaques are a beta-amyloid leftover of larger proteins which when they cluster together they interrupt the functioning of the neurons and in return affecting cell to cell communication in the brain (James and Bennett, 2019). When cell-to-cell communication is lost it becomes hard for one to absorb and release information; thus what is referred to as memory loss. The clusters form amyloid plaques, which are more massive clusters that also contain cell debris. In the cell membrane of a neuron, there are amyloid precursor proteins, which helps the cell grow and repair its self. It gets used, broken down and recycled, as the protein is soluble. This process is caused by alpha-secretase and gamma-secretase cropping up the protein. If another protein (Beta-secretase) teams up with Gamma-secretase instead it means the leftover protein is no longer soluble. This creates Amyloid-Beta, the monomers are sticky and start to clump together outside of the cell to form Beta-amyloid clumps. These plaques get between the neurons and stop signaling. If brain cells can’t signal then normal brain function is seriously impaired (e.g. memory), also, starts an immune response due to inflammation around the neurons. Plaques can gather around blood vessels and cause the walls to weaken, increasing the risk of hemorrhage that is Amyloid angiopathy (The weakening of blood vessel walls, increasing the risk of hemorrhage). Tangles, on the other hand, are the Tau proteins, which aid in neural transport and internal support by carrying nutrients to other parts of the brain. Cells are held together by their cytoskeleton, which is made up of Microtubules. Tau makes sure that these tubules stay straight so food molecules can be transferred. It’s thought that the presence of Beta-amyloid plaque outside of the neuron causes the presence of Kinase. Kinase transports phosphate groups to the Tau protein and causes them to change their shape, in turn; Tau can no longer support the microtubules so they clump together to create neurofibrillary tangles. Neurons with tangles cannot signal and will undergo Apoptosis. This will cause some changes in brain structure. A person who happens to develop Alzheimer as a result of Tau changing their shape by collecting themselves into tangles which then forms structures known as neurofibrillary structures, which are toxic to the brain (James and Bennett, 2019). Interrupting the supply of nutrients to the brain hinders normal brain functioning, which then causes cognitive impairment, and as the condition the last one then gets Alzheimer.

The Apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) is the best-understood gene factor liked to Alzheimer. A variation in APOE e4 increases the risk factor of one getting Alzheimer. The gene is hereditary just the same way we understand how DNA is passed from parents. However, not all the people with APOE e4 get Alzheimer; it is only a few, but it is good to frequently visit a physician if one experiences the symptoms and has the same gene mutation. The Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Three possible alleles exist for APOE—E2, E3 and E4. Each allele differs by one base, and the protein product of each gene differs by one amino acid. An individual with at least one E4 allele is more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease (Lin et al., 2018). Similarly, an E2 allele means the person is less likely to develop the disease, (this is not an exact science). Many individuals with two E4 alleles never develop Alzheimer’s and two E2 alleles won’t rule out Alzheimer’s completely. Like most common chronic disorders, Alzheimer’s disease is polygenic and influenced by environment.

A good number of those with Down syndrome happen to be diagnosed with Alzheimer at an old age. Having three copies of the #21 chromosome explains the issue; thus one has three copies of the protein that leads to the formation of beta-amyloid (Kumar, and Singh, 2015). With gender, less is to be explained. However, there are more females with Alzheimer because they tend to live longer compared to males. Nearly everyone with mild cognitive impairment develops Alzheimer after some years. Thus this category is also at risk. Also people who have had severe past head trauma can easily get Alzheimer because of the frequent interruption of the neurotransmitter cells. Lifestyle for example; nonnutritional diet and lack of physical exercise, and long-term health conditions, like high blood pressure and diabetes, plays a role in the risk of getting Alzheimer disease. Diagnosis of Alzheimer is a big problem, but when one dies, true diagnosis can be obtained from the autopsy done to carry out examinations if the brain is damaged or a person’s mind was affected, and one had Alzheimer disease. However, testing allows for 90% accuracy that a patient has “probable Alzheimer disease”. The rest of the diagnosis is through studying the symptoms stated above, and if they keep recurring before one gets medicine, then there are very high chances one has Alzheimer disease. The diagnosis helps to curb problems such as incontinence and depression.

The treatment options that exist do not treat the disease but the symptoms of Alzheimer. The drugs offered do not stop the progression of Alzheimer, but to some point, they just slow down the progress. Among the medications given include; cholinesterase inhibitors where there are four types given that are, Tacrine (Cognex), Donepezil (Aricept), Rivastigmine (Exelon) and Galantamine (Razadyne). Antidepressants are also given anxiolytics and antipsychotic drugs. Cholinesterase Inhibitors slow the progression of the disease by preventing the breakdown of acetylcholine, while antidepressants—paroxetine, fluoxetine, citalopram, and sertraline-to treat irritability and mood disorders in Alzheimer patients. Anxiolytics – Lorazepam (Ativan) is used to treat any anxiety or difficulty sleeping. Antipsychotic medications aripiprazole (Abilify) and olanzapine (Zyprexa)-help in treating any hallucinations, delusions, agitation, and aggression. Nondrug therapies include vitamin E, hormone therapy for estrogen in women. Music and art therapy are also good since it relaxes the brain and neurotransmitters. Memantine (Namenda) is used to relieve advanced symptoms of Alzheimer blocks NMDA Glu receptors (Glu receptors usually let Calcium ions in), but with medication, they decrease the number of Calcium ions (Selkoe, and Hardy, 2016). High levels of Calcium ions can cause oxidative stress, apoptosis, and neurodegeneration thus by blocking this, the drug delays progress of symptoms (Kumar and Singh, 2015).

 Cholinesterase inhibitors not effective with advanced stages of Alzheimer’s because they eventually lose their effect because as the disease progresses, the brain produces less acetylcholine. Currently, there are new drugs under research in Russia where the theory behind it is there is an alteration to the amyloid protein processing in Alzheimer that involves alterations in secretase activity by using secretase inhibitors, can reduce levels of abnormal amyloid protein fragments (Alzheimer’s. 2015). Reducing the level of amyloid fragments implies that cell communication will not be lost that chances of one getting Alzheimer are law even when there is a genetic history.

Conclusively, Alzheimer is a manageable condition which when one discovers it at an early stage the symptoms can be treated, and one may get back to normal — participating in social events, engaging in physical exercises, eating a proper diet and avoiding stressful situations it the best way to prevent cognitive impairment which might result in Alzheimer. If a family in unsure, ruling out Alzheimer disease as a cause for memory deficit in a family member, diagnosis can ease concerns. Diagnosis is done to help the family have as much time to prepare and learn how to care for a family member with Alzheimer disease (Alzheimer’s, 2015). Some treatment medications are only used in the early stage, so the earlier you can diagnose, the better the treatment options. We should all show love and help those with memory problems gain back their memory through therapies and helping them seek medication.

LITERATURE CITED

Alzheimer’s, A. (2015). 2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 11(3), 332.

Armstrong, R. (2013). What causes Alzheimer’s disease?. Folia Neuropathologica, 51(3), 169-188.James, B. D., & Bennett, D. A. (2019). Causes and Patterns of Dementia: An Update in the Era of Redefining Alzheimer’s Disease. Annual review of public health, 40.

Kumar, A., & Singh, A. (2015). A review on Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology and its management: an update. Pharmacological Reports, 67(2), 195-203.Lin, Y. T., Seo, J., Gao, F., Feldman, H. M., Wen, H. L., Penney, J., … & Rueda, R. (2018). APOE4 causes widespread molecular and cellular alterations associated with Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes in human iPSC-derived brain cell types. Neuron, 98(6), 1141-1154.Winblad, B., Amouyel, P., Andrieu, S., Ballard, C., Brayne, C., Brodaty, H., … & Fratiglioni, L. (2016). Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. The Lancet Neurology, 15(5), 455-532.Selkoe, D. J., & Hardy, J. (2016). The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO molecular medicine, 8(6), 595-608.

Discretion Each day, police officers encounter a range of situations which they have to deal with.

Discretion

Name

Institution

Discretion

Each day, police officers encounter a range of situations which they have to deal with. Not two situation encountered by the officers can ever be similar, even when a range of situation are examined over a long period of time. Whenever they encounter these situations, the officers have to decide on specific issues on their own or with some help or advice from senior or colleagues (The Rynard Law Firm, n.d.). This is what brings about police desecration. The situations present discretionary issues to the police officers and the officer have to take their chances with probability of upholding the law or undermining the rights of citizens.

The use of force in arrests is one of the greatest discretionary issues faced by the police. Arrest is a normal police operational procedure use to apprehend suspects and offenders. However, arrest are not easy since some suspects try to resist being arrested prompting the police to use alternative means, preferably force to take the suspects or criminals in to custody. The police have to determine when to use for and when not to use force. They also have to decide on the exact amount of force that is supposed to be used during the arrest. A real life situation of arrest using force is arrest of an offender found driving under influence of alcohol or other drugs (Magnoli, 2008).

The normal protocol for arresting this kind of offender is to ask them to pull off the road and ask then step out of the car showing the police officer their hands. The police officer should then tell the subject that he or she is under arrest and proceed to subdue them by handcuffing them and afterwards transport them to the police station for interrogation. During such arrest the police can only use force when the offender tries to resist arrest. In the arrest of the drug intoxicated drive the officer has only two discretionary alternatives; to use force or not to use force. How since subjects who are under influence are normally problematic, force such as use of a teaser may be necessary.

According to the most policies departments’ law enforcement manuals, officer can use force based on the conduct of the suspect, personal factors such as size, age, level of skills and the ration of officer to that of the subjects; closeness to weapons; suspects mental capacity and suspected influence of alcohol or drugs; the magnitude of the offense; resources available to the officer during the circumstance; experience and training of the police officer; risk of escape; potential of injury to the officers, citizens and suspects.

The use of force in deployed in this particular situation is reasonable and therefore it is right (May & Headley, 2008). The subject is under influence and therefore, not in a proper mental state that can allow him to go along with the arrest without resistance. The police use of a teaser is thus correct to ensure that he was totally subdued and would not cause any harm to the officers (Terrill & Mastrofski, 2002).

In this instance the police chief in charge of the arrest makes proper use of the desecration. The officer and his team are faced with a situation in which they needed to make a quick decision on how to arrest an obviously intoxicated subject without harm themselves, onlookers and property. The officers should choose the decision to use a teaser to subdue the suspect without contravening the law enforcement policies.

Police chiefs also encounter discretionary issues when deploying police officers to their duties (The Rynard Law Firm, n.d.). A police chief maintains the discretion to deploy unfarmed patrol officers or not. A situation that may require discretion in deployment is deployment of uniformed patrol officer following an increase in cases of crime in a town. The normal protocol for deployment of patrol officers requires proper examination of the situation by relevant police to determine whether it is necessary to deploy uniformed patrol officers or not (Stevens, 2009). In a situation where the police chief has to act alone he/she is face with several discretional challenges, which include deploying uniformed patrol officers, deploying non-uniformed patrol officers, are letting the normal patrol routines to continue.

Complying with controlling protocols in deployment uniformed officers ensures that there is proper planning to avail necessary resources. It also ensures proper accountability of the activities of the patrol team. The controlling protocols also ensure that the patrol team has the proper basic composition to deal with issues such as interruption of crime, deterrence of crime and arrests (Stevens, 2009).

Exercise of discretion in deployment of uniformed officers by a police chief may however be necessary in rapid deployment situation or emergency situation. The urgency of the situation to be contained justifies the discretional act. The police chief may relay on his knowledge on the crime in this region and the police officers and a deployment any number of uniformed police officers in a team of his desired composition. In deploying the officers the police chief relays on his judgment of the situation to determine whether there is need for such deployment (Kuper & Kuper, 2003). If the police chief buys time waiting for correspondence from his seniors, the situation on the ground may get worse and require more officers and resources.

On the basis of the above, discretion issues present dilemmas to police chiefs. The police chiefs have to take a decision to do what can be considered as going against the set police protocol or the law in order to achieve greater good.

References

Kuper, A., & Kuper, J. (2003). The social science encyclopedia. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Magnoli, G. (2008). Police Use of Force Manuals Emphasize Officer Discretion, Noozhawk Review Finds. Retrieved from http://www.noozhawk.com/article/121811_police_use_of_force.

May, D. A. & Headley, J. E. (2008). Reasonable Use of Force by Police: Seizures, Firearms, and High-Speed Chases. New York: Peter Lang.

Stevens, D. (2009). An Introduction to American Policing. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers

Terrill, W. & Mastrofski, S. D. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly 19(2):215-248.

The Rynard Law Firm. (n.d.). Police Discretion. Retrieved from http://rynardlaw.com/Article6.aspx.

Hannibal was given birth to in 247 Before Christ (B.C) in Carthage.

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Hannibal

Hannibal was given birth to in 247 Before Christ (B.C) in Carthage. The city was located in the modern Tunis. Hannibal’s father was called Hamilcar Barca who was a senior general of the Carthaginian army. Hamilcar Barca fought in the initial Punic warfare which was between Carthage and Rome where the Carthaginian army lost. Hannibal was made to pledge eternal detestation towards Rome at a very tender age by his father. When Hannibal was only nine years of age, he went with his father on a mission to gain a capture of Spain.

During this voyage, Hannibal managed to acquire great military knowledge which helped him greatly in life. After the death of Hannibal’s father in 229 and his brother in 226, He was elected the commander of chief the Carthaginian army (Garland & Robert, 180). Ten years later, Hannibal attacked Sagantum which was in Spain; the Sagantum was controlled by the Romans. Hannibal attacked the city because he was acting on the promise he had made to his father. The attack led to the beginning of the warfare involving Rome and Carthage (Harris & Thomas, 220).

Before the war begun, Hannibal already had knowledge of what was he was going to do. Carthage had no navy therefore it was not easy for the military to go to Italy through the Mediterranean Sea, Hannibal therefore came up with a plan which was very dangerous but very ingenious (Mills & Cliff, 167). The plan was on how to help the military reach Italy over land. The plan was for the Carthaginian military to travel from their country, through Spain crossing Alps and then they would definitely reach the heart of their enemy which was Rome (Green & Robert, 190).

On his journey, Hannibal left to Rome in a cold winter of the 218 B.C with 9,000 cavalry, 37 war elephants and 50,000 infantry. While crossing the Alps, the Carthaginian military suffered hostility from local tribesmen and also from some few elements (Lancel & Serge,167). By the time the army reached Italy, that was after fourteen days, 9,000 of them had perished and several elephants perished too. The number of the perished men was later replaced when the Carthaginian army was joined by 14,000 rebels from the northern Gaul (Abbott & Jacob, 190).

The army was therefore composed of 60,000 men who proved very superior to the Roman armed forces. The Roman was exasperated after three major victories (Leckie & Ross, 213). During this warring time, Hannibal lost his right eye. After the war Hannibal went back to Cartage to have a peaceful talk with Scipio (Harris & Thomas, 179). The peace talks did not work out, they fell out because of the Panic’s faith. After this peace talk, Hannibal was again sent to Zama to fight with the Romans again but this time the Carthage army was defeated by the Romans.

The Romans realized that the Carthage army wanted to fight them again. Instead with fighting with them, the Romans demanded that Hannibal surrender, Hannibal did so and later on went on exile to Libyssa where he poisoned himself and died (Bradford & Ernle, 207). Hannibal was remembered by the Carthaginians as their valiant leader who lead them to the second Punic war while the Romans remembered him as who had terrorized them (Baker & George, 146).

The Romans scared disobedient children by telling those stories about Hannibal. The styles that Hannibal used at the war are still be used even today. Many people were inspired by the tactics Hannibal used during the war and he is considered as one of the greatest militants in history.

Works Cited

Abbott, Jacob. Hannibal. Akron, Ohio: Werner, 2009. Print

Baker, George P. Hannibal. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2009. Print.

Bradford, Ernle D. S. Hannibal. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007. Print.

Garland, Robert. Hannibal. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2010. Print.

Green, Robert. Hannibal. New York: Franklin Watts, 2006. Print.

Harris, Thomas. Hannibal. New York, N.Y: Delacorte Press, 2008. Print.

Harris, Thomas. Hannibal Rising: A Novel. New York: Delacorte Press, 2006. Print.

Lancel, Serge. Hannibal. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2008. Print.

Leckie, Ross. Hannibal. Washington, D.C: Regnery Pub, 2007. Print.

Mills, Cliff. Hannibal. New York: Chelsea House, 2008. Print.