Recent orders

AJS572

Cyber Crime

Student’s Name

Affiliation

Course

Date

Introduction

Cyber crime is an act of crime that involves unlawful acts such as hacking through the internet. Such acts include internet fraud, telemarketing, stealing of essential data from credit cards and identity theft (Gerdes, 2009). Cyber crimes have been on the sharp increase with the ever increasing need for internet on a global scale. The crimes can be committed by an individual or a group of people. The world without internet had a hard time for criminals because intercepting personal information was hard.

Availability of increased use of internet needed that all personal information had to be stored online. This was a leeway for the criminals because they could easily and secretly get access to people’s information through hacking or infecting people’s computers with malwares which secretly steal the owners’ personal information without him/ her realising. Cracking down cyber criminals is complex because their identity and location is anonymous (Gerdes, 2009). Computers used in cyber crime can remotely be controlled by a criminal who is in a different location. This is why it is very complicated to deal with such crimes.

Cyber criminals have a variety of tricks used to commit their offences. Such individuals develop particular well schemed system of accessing and secretly stealing personal information. Some of the techniques used are the use of botnet, fast flux, use of zombie computers, social engineering, skimmers among other tricks. All these strategies are geared towards ensuring that they commit a crime and still remain untraceable.

Fast flux

This is a system utilised by hackers to ensure their location is untraceable. Fast flux works in a way that the stolen confidential data about an individual is passed in a series of computers in different locations. The data is moved in a botnet ; a system that makes it very complicated to trace the origin of the malware that was used to spy on personal information. This system is also very effective in protecting the security agencies from identifying the phishing websites.

Social engineering

Social engineering utilises the phishing technique. Hackers use intellectual systems to trick, manipulate and convince their targets to reveal their personal and confidential data. This system is viewed by cyber criminals as effective and easier to execute as compared to the others. Social engineering is divided in several classes for instance the human based system where there is a personal interaction between the target and the criminal. The criminal can act as a third party, an impersonator or he/ she can pose as an important user such as an IT expert for the company the victim works.

Computer based approach utilises a number of strategies such as phishing, online scams and baiting. Baiting involves the manner in which ads that are appealing to the target pop on the webpage he/ she is browsing. Once the link is clicked the malicious software automatically installs itself in the subject’s computer and automatically steals and sends information.

Botnet

Botnet is a collection of softwares that are responsible for spreading malwares. In most cases the criminals pose their malicious softwares and impost them with the name of a software (Carr, 2009). Alternatively they can also blend a software download that requires before software is downloaded lots of ads pop on the user’s screen and any wrong click is an automatic download for the malware which secretly installs itself in the user’s computer.

Zombie computer

A computer cracker in a gullible manner penetrates and utilizes a victim’s computer. After infiltration he/ she use the computer to commit criminal offences and illegal activities. The user has no knowledge that his/ her computer is being used and in fact, the computer still works normally. The computer is used to as an execution point for sending web page attacks and spams (Reyes, 2007). When the matter is identified by the counter cyber crime unit the innocent person is arrested. Once the operations of one zombie computer have been compromised the cracker infiltrates into another computer and works the same way. The crackers usually cancel the user’s internet service provider (ISP).

Denial of service

Denial of service (DoS) works in a manner that the legitimate user is denied access to essential information or services. The computer network connection is prone to such attacks which prevent the user from accessing online accounts, websites and emails or any other services that depend on affected computer for transmission (Carr, 2009). Spams can be used to infect Gmail, hotmail and yahoo accounts. An infected computer’s vulnerability state may make the hacker use the infected computer to attack other computers too. In this case, the infected computer is transformed to work as a zombie.

Installation of legitimate and good anti viruses can be the best way to prevent the user’s computer from the denial of service attack. Installation of firewall is also key to preventing such attacks. Common indicators of DoS are an unusual slow network performance, an increase in the number of spams in personal accounts and lack of access to websites.

ATM skimmers

This is whereby a device is used to whip credit card data once the ATM is swiped. Such practices are common restaurants and stores. The data that is stolen is sold to criminals who use it to steal and terrorise the victims. ATM skimming can also be termed as identity theft where criminals steal critical personal stored on credit cards including passwords to financial accounts. The criminals have the ability to make counterfeit readers which the victim unknowingly may swipe his/ her credit card and eventually the counterfeit reader stores all the data in its magnetic strip (Hynson, 2012).

The profiles and categories of cyber criminals change over time. There are several factors believed during classification. The varied motive and intention of the hackers and tools and techniques used by the criminals is essential in their classification. There are two main types of criminal profiling i.e. the deductive and inductive profiling.

The deductive profiling is the manner in which a criminal builds his/ her profile with the basis of the information and data found at the crime scene. The system is based on improved human intelligence and it is not used on static data. The professionals evaluate the hackers’ minds and think exactly in a similar manner as the perpetuator.

The inductive profiling on the other hand utilises the statistics and comparative analysis when creating criminals’ profiles. Data from already committed cybercrimes, system and methods used observations, data from the counter cyber crime database and interviews (Gerdes, 2009). The information is a centre in creating the profile of the criminal.

There are several systems put in place to counter cyber crime. Most counties that have reported high cyber crimes require that all internet service providers have a mandatory of keeping logfiles for a predetermined duration (Reyes, 2007). The European Union has a regulation that anyone involved in E-mail trafficking be convicted and retained for a term not less than one year. In New York for instance, computer related criminal activities have a jail term between six months to fifteen years in prison depending on the class and degree of the crime. Class A crimes are petty cyber crime offences whereas class C and D are crimes that are committed on a much larger scale (Hynson, 2012).

Section 18 U.S.C. § 1028 of the American constitution states that transferring or processing of a device that can be used to fabricate identification documents is a crime (Adamson, 2003). 18 U.S. Code Section 1463 further the use of a computer to ferry in foreign commerce or interstate is an offence (Reyes, 2007). Most states in America classify hacking as an act of trespass and vandalism. The unauthorised access to a computer, computer network or system is a serious transgression. A further alteration, damage disruption or damage of data and operation of a computer is also outlined as unlawful. There are also regulations that stipulate that it is unlawful to receive copy or use information that has been obtained from hacking or cracking. Such crimes have long jail terms.

The jail term for class B misdemeanour hackers is six months in prison with a fine of $ 1000 or at times the hacker may serve any of the two penalties (Hynson, 2012). The class B felony hacker may serve a jail term of even up to 20 years or alternatively be fined $ 15,000 (Carr, 2009). At times the hacker may serve the 20 years sentence and also pay $ 15,000 (Hynson, 2012). The unauthorised access to a computer, computer system or network either remotely or physically is a crime punishable with the penalty being serving a class B misdemeanour sentence or a class D felony jail term which is 5 years with a fine of up to $ 5,000 (Kshetri, 2010).

Several bills in a number of states in the USA are also being put in place to combat cyber crime on a much wider scale. Ohio State for instance, is working on a bill to prevent arrested cyber crime inmates from accessing internet unless it is strictly for educational purposes (Hynson, 2012). New Jersey State currently working on a bill geared at increasing the penalties and jail terms for crimes relating to cyber crime (Hynson, 2012).

Conclusion

The fight against cyber crime should be a global collective responsibility of every state. Apparently, in most third world countries the implementation of legislative measures to counter cyber crimes have been a problem because the countries lack adequate and well skilled personnel that can identify the criminals (Reyes, 2007). Similarly, the advancement in the programming, the zombie computer technology and anonymity makes it even more complicated for developed countries to arrest the criminals. Installation of proper anti-viruses and firewall is important in controlling and preventing occurrence of online cyber crimes.

Promotion of cyber crime and cyber security literacy to internet users is a forward step to make browsing secure, safe and resilient. Coordination between the private sector, government agencies and the whole society makes the fight much easier. The American secret run the Electronic Crime Task Force (ECTF) works to identify and locate the whereabouts of the cyber criminals. The American government estimates a total of $ 600 million has been stolen by crackers and hackers (Hynson, 2012).

References

Adamson, A. (2003). Cyber crime. Broomall, PA: Mason Crest Publishers.

Gerdes, L. I. (2009). Cyber crime. Detroit: Greenhaven Press.

Hynson, C. (2012). Cyber crime. Mankato, Minn.: Smart Apple Media.

Kshetri, N. (2010). The global cybercrime industry: Economic, institutional and strategic

perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer.

AIRSHIPPERS

AIRSHIPPERS

Author’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Problem

The transport and shipment industry has evolved and changed over the years. This transition has changed through a complex, dynamic and slow process which dynamic and not predictable. This is not to mention that prediction of the changes have not been seamless or linear. The manufacturers are thus faced by the challenges of the fluctuations of the market making the manufacturers to improve and change their production schedules. Similarly, they have been compelled to increase the amount and level of inventory while at the same time lower and limit the unforeseen expenses or expenditures. The miscellaneous expenditure which may not have been factored in during the initial cost budgeting. A specific attention and focus is given to producers in the electrical and electronic companies.

Purpose

The primary and basic objective of this paper is to bring to the front the issues and aspects that pose challenges in the transport companies. A keen focus and attention is given to the classical or the traditional overseas services relative to their providers.

Solution

The air transport has come as a remedy in this case and instance because it is critical to ensure that the goods are transported from one part to another. For instance, the goods which would otherwise take weeks from China would now take lesser times in terms of days. This is to say that the air shippers have made the delivery of products to the final consumers to be relatively faster. For instance, a product from an American factory would faster reach its final consumers in faraway country, due to air transport-or the air shippers (Chatfield & Bjørn, 1997). The airship owners are strategically positioned in terms of ownership of the vital connection points, thus by fact and extension reducing the supply chain in terms of time and cost.

Reference

Chatfield, A. T., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (1997). The impact of IOS-enabled business process change on business outcomes: transformation of the value chain of Japan airlines. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13-40.

Perceptions of Security and Guest Hotel Selection

Perceptions of Security and Guest Hotel Selection

(Author’s name)

(Institutional Affiliation)

Introduction

The physical attributes of a service business or what one can refer to as the servicescape plays a significant role in both the satisfaction and choice of customers. Most of the hotels make use of physical features like space for conferences, meeting, guest rooms and public areas to market their properties for meeting organizers. There are different kinds of studies that describe numerous factors that affect the choice of customers for hotels and accommodation. However, only a few emphasize on hotel security and safety elements. This paper looks at how hotel security and safety elements influences the practice of selection for accommodation and meetings, and their willingness to pay more for a hotel that is perceived to have higher levels of security and safety. The paper also illustrates the relationship of the guest’s level of experience and the nature of accommodation and activities they plan to hold in the hotel in relation to the importance they put on the security and safety attributes of the hotel in the US. A number of studies carried out to look at some of the factors related to security that influenced the decision of guests to choose a certain hotel over another are as follows. 1.) The first attribute is safety features visible in the hotel. 2.) Staff training and documentation, which ensures that all the hotel staff is well trained to keep the guests safe and to keep excellent records of all visitors to the hotel, and 3.) General security features (Hilliard & Baloglu, 2008). All these elements make it possible for the hotel guests to estimate and measure the level of security in a certain hotel.

Staff training and documentation also had a positive influence on the guest’s selection of a hotel with security and safety certification over a hotel that did not have these features. In addition to this, the guest’s willingness to pay more money for the accommodation at the hotel with a security and safety certification was influenced positively by the staff training, documentation, and general features of security (Hilliard & Baloglu, 2008). The implications of the findings of these studies and future research issues are discussed in the paper.

Hotel security and safety is one of the most essential elements in the concerns of most travelers. Most of the travelers in the world usually have to worry about being crime victims while they are not at home. A review and critical look at the negative effects on hotel booking when a tourist attacks happens and is publicized, helps us to see how the insights of security is important to the hotel guests. When they have a choice, hotel guests will always look for hotels that have superior security provisions. Initially, most guests and travelers would choose a hotel that satisfies their balance and criteria of price, location and nourishment service. However, after the visitors have sampled a hotel and its amenities and elements, its security amenities might go a long way in influencing the loyalty of return client guests. This means that if the guests find the security elements and amenities appealing then there is a higher chance of them returning to the same hotel (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

Statement of the Problem

Hotel security and safety is an increasing concern among most hotel guests and travelers all over the world. Staying at hotels and travelling tends to be a stressful process of becoming a victim of terrorism or crime while away from one’s home. Travelers and guests at hotels have increased sense of vulnerability for several reasons including strange surroundings, lack of support groups, unfamiliarity and lack of control of the immediate surroundings, which heighten this anxiety and sense of susceptibility. One only has to witness the negative effect on the rate at which guests book hotels after a security alert. Studies have shown that when frequent hotel guests have a choice they will look for hotels that have superior security features (Shanahan and Hyman 107- 118). Traditionally, hotel guests will choose what satisfies their balance and criteria of price, location, food service and business facilities. However, after the guests have visited a property, its security amenities will determine the continued visitation and loyalty of that guest. This paper will, therefore, discuss and show how physical facilities and plans for crisis management have influences on the perceptions of safety and security and how perceptions of security affect the hotel selection criteria of guests.

Hypothesis

There is a relationship between perceptions of security and physical facilities.

There is a relationship between perceptions of security and plans for crisis management.

There is a relationship between guests’ hotel selection and perceptions of security.

Justification

Satisfaction of customers is one of the most critical philosophies in business, which tends to the creation and establishment of value for customers, managing and anticipating their expectations and needs, and showing the responsibility and ability to satisfy their needs. Customer satisfaction and quality of service are essential factors for success for any kind of business not just in hospitality. Enterprises exist solely because they have consumers to attend to and serve. The key to achieve sustainable competitive advantage depends on the delivery of service of high quality that usually leads to satisfied customers. Customer satisfaction and service quality are key elements in the battle to achieve and attain customer retention and customer satisfaction (Dube & Renaghan, 1999).

Customer satisfaction results from the perception of the customers of the value received in a relationship or transaction, where value is the same as the service quality perceived, when compared to the value of the expected relationships or transactions with competitive vendors. Therefore, for a vendor to attain customer satisfaction, it is essential to anticipate and recognize the wishes of the clientele and to have the capacity to satisfy and meet them. Businesses that have the ability to recognize and satisfy the needs of the customers quickly make more profits than those businesses that refuse to understand and meet them. Since the expenditure of drawing new clientele and keeping old ones is higher, managers must insist on retaining existing customers to cut costs by implementing effective and efficient policies of customer loyalty, comfort and satisfaction. This is especially critical in the hotel industry (Dube & Renaghan, 1999).

This is to mean that those hotel industries in the US that provide their customers with the amenities that contribute to their satisfaction like high quality security and safety amenities will gain more competitive advantage over other hotels. This study, thus, is important as it highlights some of the issues that affect the success of the hotel industry: lack of security and safety amenities. The US has become security and safety oriented especially after 9/11 attacks. As it follows, the industry that emphasizes on the fact more becomes more successful than that which does not. the study of security amenities in hotels has its implications both on the industry and the guests. For instance, increased profits gained from the industry can only be realized with increased attention to the availed security and safety measures. On the other hand, guests will more likely visit those hotels that have high standard security amenities. The study intends to fill in the available gaps on the issue of perceptions of hotel security and how it affects customer attraction and retention.

As it follows, the examination of the issue of perceptions of security as one of the major decisive by hotel guests in assessing the quality of a potential hotel is essential as it helps in showing how essential customer satisfaction is, and how hoteliers have to recognize some of the needs and the wants of customers so as to be able to satisfy them. Security, as it will be seen later, is one of the key concerns in hotel guest, as they constantly worry about their safety especially when away from home and when in unfamiliar areas. Examining this topic, therefore, is critical especially for hoteliers as it implies how essential the issue of security is in the determination of whether a hotel will retain its customers and competitive advantage or not.

Literature Review

Numerous researchers have conducted numerous studies on the attributes that influence the selection of hotels. Those attributes directly affecting the choices are what researchers call determinant attributes. These attributes may arouse the purchase intentions of the consumers and differentiate the offerings of the competitors. The facilities and services offered by a hotel or its attributes are those products or service features that lead customers to choose one product over another. In 1996, a number of researchers defined perceptions of hotel features and attributes as the level to which guests and travelers find a number of facilities and services essential to the satisfaction of customers (Wuest, Tas & Emenheiser, 1996).

Hotel attributes are facilities and services that hotels offer, whose characteristics and features affect the customer and her choice among other different services and products. These attributes that directly affect the decisions of guests can also be referred to as determining attributes, as they can lead to a desire to purchase and differentiate this desire in relation to the offer by competitors. Perceptions of hotel attributes are defined by a number of studies as the level of importance hotel guests and tourists attach to a number of facilities and services in meeting their needs and wants. The results of a number of surveys show that guests, when selecting a hotel, select price, location if the accommodation and value for their money, service quality, security, cleanliness and the reputation of the hotel as the key attributes. In other studies of the behaviors of hotel guests during the selection of their accommodation, the distinctions in the priorities of choosing elements between the different kinds of guests were analyzed (Kersloot & Kauko, 2004).

At present, one of the chief issues in the hotel industry for the managers is the ability and knowhow to provide and sustain customer comfort and satisfaction. Requirements of customers for quality service in the hotel and tourism industry become exceedingly evident to relevant professionals. In this case, providing services of high quality and improving the satisfaction of customers are widely seen as crucial elements boosting the performances of businesses and enterprises in the hotel industry. Hotels with excellent service quality will in the end improve their profitability. In a hospitality industry with high levels of competition, among enterprises that offer homogenous services, individual enterprises have to be able to satisfy their customers better than their competitors are (Cadotte & Turgeon, 1998).

Numerous studies have analyzed the differences between leisure and business guests. They suggest that the business guests put location and cleanliness in the first position, while the other kind of guests choose security, safety, accommodation prices and personal contact as the most essential factors. From the previously mentioned, one can conclude that hotel attributes have different value when it comes to making decisions about hotels and accommodation. There are factors that are essential to all hotel guests, but there are a number of differences in priorities between different types of hotel guests, when examining the essentiality of hotel attributes in hotel selection decisions, one should consider or look at, at least two aspects of the hotel attributes from the point of view of the customers: presented and experienced (Kersloot & Kauko, 2004).

Experienced attributed would include those attributes that the guest has experienced while staying at a certain hotel. These attributes can cause or influence hotel guests to return to the same hotel, or can influence loyalty. On the other hand, presented attributes are those attributes that the hotel guest has not experienced because the guest has never stayed in a certain hotel so they are only familiar or presents to the potential guest through a number of communication channels like television, magazines and newspapers. Attributes like cleanliness or personal contact are usually better analyzed when experienced, while price and location can easily be presented without the need for experience (Kersloot & Kauko, 2004).

In 1988 Atkinson found that the accommodation’s cleanliness followed by security and safety, hotels value for money, helpfulness and courtesy of staff as top attributes for guests in the choice of guests of hotels (Atkinson, 1988). Other studies surveyed a number of guests asking them to rate the importance of a number of hotel features and attributes in hotel selection decisions. The effects of this research pointed that the quality and price of the services and products in the hotel rated as the most crucial attributes across all categories of guests followed by those features related to safety and security of the location of the hotel (Ananth, DeMicco, Moreo &Howey, 1992).

In 1996, LeBlanc and Nguyen examined some of the most significant factors that signaled the image of the hotel to the guests. The factors that guests might use to determine the image of the hotel included the physical environment of the hotel, service personnel, corporate identity, security, accessibility and quality of services. The researchers argued that the marketing efforts of the hotel should be directed to highlight the environmental and security cues to attract new clientele. An extensive and wide review of the available literature for the hotel industry indicates that that attributes such as cleanliness, room rate, location, security, reputation and service quality of the hotel have been considered by most hotel guests in hotel selection decision (LeBlanc & Nguyen, 1996).

In addition to this, loyalty and satisfaction of customers has also been studied. To attain loyalty and to surpass competitors, hoteliers must be able to attain high levels of satisfaction for the customers for the services offered. Numerous studies analyze the desires and needs of the hotel customers and guests. A research by Wuest in 1996 defined the perception of the attributes of a hotel as the level to which tourists and guests might find a number of facilities and services critical for their stay in a hotel (Wuest, 1996). Hotel attributes like security, cleanliness, and price, personal service, and location, opportunities for relaxation, safety and physical attractiveness are recognized as some of the key decisive by hotel guests to assess the quality of the hotel (Knutson, 1988).

Many surveys have looked into the relationship that exists between leisure and business guests in their hotel choice criteria. These studies show that the essential attributes or features affecting the guest hotel- choice decisions for business travelers were location and cleanliness. On the other hand, the leisure-seeking guests saw personal interactions, security and room rates as essential. Leisure guests seemed to be more concerned with the rates of the rooms and the value in their first selection of hotel. The studies argued that the quality of personal interactions guests experienced with the staff were also crucial components of the evaluation of service quality. The service quality of employees was also cited as essential to leisure guests when selecting overnight rooms (Clow, Garretson & Kurtz, 1994).

In 1988, Knutson pointed out that leisure guests were more concerned with the protection and security of their accommodation. This concern was thought to have stemmed from the notion that this leisure trips usually involve families and that these guests have a higher sense to what might happen or occur around then while their families are around (Knutson, 1988). In 1993, Marshall revealed that security was described as one of the most crucial criteria guests use to select hotels. He indicated that guests and tourists at hotels want to feel secure and safe in their accommodation, and are even willing to pay a lot of money for that kind of accommodation. The security and safety system may differentiate one hotel or property from its competitors, therefore, becoming a strategy for gaining competitive advantage that helps hotels to gain the trust and confidence of tourists, as it follows, the study concluded that leisure travelers were more likely to show concern with regard to the name familiarity and reputation of a hotel (Marshall, 1993).

Other studies have also indicated that other hotel attributes or features are also seen as essential by both leisure and business travelers. The researchers examined the differences that existed between leisure and business guests in an attempt to find the features and attributes that initially attract these two different kinds of guests. The findings of these studies indicated that a number of factors were considered by both leisure and business guests when deciding on which hotel to stay for either repeated patronage or for the first time. These factors included such things as cleanliness, comfort, well- maintained rooms, convenience, courtesy, and security, safety and employees who were friendly and courteous (Knutson, 1988).

In the period between 1984- 85, Lewis tested a number of hotel features and attributes to find the basis of hotel choices by a number of leisure and business guests. The findings of these studies indicated that the price and the location of the hotels were the main determinant features for hotel choices made by both leisure and hotel guests (Lewis, 1985).

In most of these studies conducted on hotel attributes guests look for while deciding on a hotel to stay in, security was found to be top priority as rated by leisure and business travelers followed by front desk and room service and quality of service. In these studies, leisure travelers gave a higher mean score of importance on the security attribute than their business counterparts. In fact, security and safety have been shown to be the main concern of leisure guests when patronizing for accommodation. As it was seen from the paragraphs above, this seems to result from the idea that leisure trips usually involve other family members, and that most leisure guests seem to have an increased sensitivity and concern with the safety and security of their family members. For hoteliers, a security and safety system may differentiate one hotel from the others, hence becoming a winning strategy for a hotel to gain the trust and confidence of travelers and guests (Marshall, 1993).

In addition to the installation of facilities and features for security like safe deposits, electronic key cards, and fire alarms, customers have to be trained about safety and security. In 1996, Andorka commented that to be secure and safe in a hotel environment, guests should have a shared responsibility with the hotel for their security and safety. For instance, hotels could put safety tips for guests and travelers in hotel rooms to remind their guests to check everything before leaving the room (Andorka, 1996).

According to another survey conducted recently, the primary chance to present a constructive notion about the standard security and safety of a hotel is usually at its perimeter. For maximum efficiency and effectiveness, the study indicated that there has to be an obvious and notable design transition as guests enter the hotel from the outside. Solid and visible deterrent cues include essential barriers like decorative fencing, perimeter walls, landscaped terraces and well- defined main entrance and driveway. According to the guests of a number of hotels, a strong transition sends a quiet but strong message to criminals that such a hotel is strictly reserved property and that it is put aside for the private use of the guests only (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

According to other guests interviewed in the study, excellent exterior lighting should be tailored in a manner that fills the space between the boundary of the hotel and its entrance, and it is the most significant security amenity during the night. When bathed with light, public areas are both a significant crime deterrent as well as inviting to travelers and guests. Excellent exterior lighting allows guests to identify potential threats if there are any. This is a minimum level of visibility that offers guests enough time or room to allow for appropriate confrontation of the given threat. Guests indicated that they would choose a hotel that had balanced and even lighting. Lighting that is balanced appears comfortable and warm, and as they argued, makes the hotel feel safe and secure (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

The study also looked at the perceptions of the hotel guests and travelers on security most hotels offer in their parking lots. The study pointed out that security at most hotel parking lots is the most overlooked and underestimated area on hotels. Crimes by strangers against guest were found to be more apt to transpire in parking bays than any other places in hotels. This was found to be because parking lots offer criminals the best places to hide, with few witnesses and with the quickest routes for escaping. Parking lot surveillance is relatively cheap as one only needs to install a video camera, or even visible uniformed security personnel that are capable of responding rapidly to a crime and sermon for help (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

Hotel guests implied that they would be more comfortable checking into hotels with a given person on the job, who is charged with ensuring their safety and security. Guests indicated that they would feel safer in hotels that had highly visible valet parking and door attendants as these two security amenities worked excellently to deter crime. Guests felt that nothing instills in them more confidence as when in the hotel than a capable door attendant who maintains eye contact and greets them as they enter hotels. Criminals do not like door attendants, as they fear that they will be identified as trespassers. Guests argued that without curbside security that is competent and capable, crimes like car theft, purse snatches and baggage thefts would significantly increase in most hotels, and, therefore, they would rather choose those hotels that had excellent curbside security (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

The study established physical barriers as well as access control is essential in assisting guests’ to make informed decisions when choosing hotels. Access control usually encompasses the employment of personnel, electronic equipment and procedures to make the property safe and secure. For instance, the whole of a hotel’s staff need adequate training to be observant to all reports of suspicious activity and to all suspicious persons and report suspicions to the manager. Most of the hotel guests interviewed in this study indicated that they appreciate the sophisticated staff attentiveness and courtesy, and they were positive that criminals did not like it at all. Hotel criminals always desire to be anonymous and unnoticed. A number of staff in the environment makes these criminals to feel unsecure and uncomfortable, and in most cases, this disturbs them to the point that they leave hotel guests alone (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

Guestroom security is another security feature most guests looked at while making decisions as to which hotel they would stay. The guestroom epitomizes the core of the security plan of a hotel. Hotel guests treat the guestroom as their sanctuary, and look hope that they remain safe in their rooms. The guestroom windows and doors have to be fortified to deter criminals from accessing entry into the rooms. Hotel guests implied that they preferred hotels rooms that had these basic security amenities and that they would feel more comfortable in hotel rooms with doors that were made of solid metal or wood, and those doors that were self- locking and self- closing (Wuest, 1996). According to the guests, the locks on the door must have a deadbolt of high quality with at least a bolt of one inch. The strike plate of the lock must be securely bolted to a metal doorframe or by making use of screws of three inches when attached to a doorjamb. In addition to this, guests found hotels with accessible sliding widows with secondary devices attached to them to prevent forced entry more appealing as opposed to those windows without.

The study predicted that the demand for the hotels credited with promoting and enhancing security would increase in the coming years especially with the increase concern and fear about terrorism all over the world. The researchers pointed out that security amenities are more essential to travelers, especially those elderly people and women travelling by themselves. The study predicts that only those hotels that are more conscious to the security and safety of guests staying in their property will gain more advantage over those hotels that fail to acknowledge and recognize the need for this new trend (Shanahan & Hyman, 2007).

Another study carried out in 1999 identifies the perceptions of travelers and hotel guests of quality of services and security facilities among the three hotel categories in most parts of the world. High Tariff A, B and Medium Tariff hotels. The study came up with seven hotel elements using a factor analysis procedure from 33 hotel attributes identified by a number of hotel guests. These seven hotel elements were IDD and security facilities, room quality, staff service quality, general amenities, value and business service. Results of the study showed that the ranking of these seven hotel elements was considerably distinct in the three categories of hotels. The mean ratings of travelers of their perceptions of hotel elements increased positively according to the higher category of the hotel (Choi & Chu, 1999).

The findings of the study are typical, in the sense that when hotel guests pay more, they expect to get better and higher quality services. The three most essential hotel elements perceived by the guests of the High Tariff A hotel category and the High Tariff B hotel category included staff service quality, security and room quality. However, the topmost priority for those guests staying at Medium Tariff hotel category was security. Guests found it difficult to live in hotel rooms that did not provide them with enough provisions for safety and security. Whichever, category or rank of hotels the guests were staying, they all had one thing in common, and that is they only chose to stay in a hotel because it had superior security amenities as compared to another hotel of the same rank or category (Choi & Chu, 1999).

Another set of researchers carried out a study in 2002, to find the distinctions that subsist between the views of accommodation management and the views of potential hotel guests when it comes to the elements that influence the selection of accommodation in hotels by hotel guests. The researchers also wanted to demonstrate the close similarities in the elements that potential hotel guests indicated as essential with previous research like cleanliness of the hotel rooms, and the safety of the environment as some of the most essential factors. According to the results of the study, one can generally state that managers rate those items and elements that they have daily working influence on, more highly; and that possible hotel guests rate the actual hotel and its amenities highly. In addition to this, there were certain needs of female guests like security and safety while for male guests, there were other elements of significance like flexible hours of walking into the hotel, and opening time (Lockyer, 2002).

The acknowledgement of these elements helps with the process of planning for resources and other amenities to maintain or attract these groups of hotel guests. Differences between the management and the hotel guests are also reflected in the results of the study where for the accommodation management; there is a reliable relationship between price, location, staff and facility. On the part of the hotel guest, there is a strong relationship between safety, location, friendly, restaurant and service. In addition, the potential hotel guests have associations between clean and price, money and value, indicating an awareness of the value and cost of the hotel accommodation. The question that aurally arises has to do with the reasons behind the differences between the potential hotel guest and accommodation management (Lockyer, 2002).

According to the study, some answers may come from considering the kind of duties accommodation management assume, which in most cases, involve constant attention to the average room rate and occupancy rate using yield management, and working together with the rest of the stuff. As a result, these elements are salient to the duties accomplished by accommodation managers. According to the researchers, saliency is a term used to refer to the fact that not all of the beliefs of a man stand out or are unique with equal prominence in the man’s cognitive field. Such a person may be more acutely aware of some specific beliefs than others may, such believes might enter his thoughts readily and might be verbalized more frequently by the individual, and they are, therefore, salient (Lockyer, 2002).

The study, therefore, suggests that saliency has an influence or effect of the elements that accommodation management feels are more critical. The study does not indicate that there is a less understanding of the needs of hotel guests by management, but rather that their concentration may be overly directed most of the times and that additional time spent in examining the needs of their guests can help motivate the operation more in the proper direction. Therefore, as a natural consequence of the involvement of managers with daily activities with certain areas of accommodation, it is their belief that certain elements are more critical to hotel guests than the guests themselves show. This brings about an essential question, one that cannot be solved by simply arguing that one is right and the other is not. However, accommodation management should carefully consider the results of the study and evaluate their views according to the researchers (Lockyer, 2002).

As the researchers argue, at certain stages of the guest selection and purchase decision of accommodation certain elements may prove to be more essential than others are. For instance, the first contact by a potential guest is when they contact a possible hotel and enquire about price, and availability. As this is usually the first contact between a potential guest and the hotel, there usually is a temptation to assume that this is for the most part the vital item to the potential guest. Nevertheless, by the time of the guest makes that contact they might have made many more other considerations. The accommodation management needs to ask the question of where they are investing their resources, and whether the hotel is utilizing the resources of the guest to the best of the guest’s advantage. This study implies that there is a significant misunderstanding by most hotel management to the needs of their guests, and that careful consideration has to be taken before simply assuming what elements influence potential guests best (Lockyer, 2002).

Another study carried out to determine which attributes affected accommodation decisions in guests, indicated that security scored the top marks as rated by leisure guests and trav