Recent orders
Deinstitutionalization What are the services provided by mental health courts
Deinstitutionalization
Student:
Institution:
Deinstitutionalization
What are the services provided by mental health courts?
Mental health courts are classified along other problem solving courts. Mental health courts are intentioned at deinstitutionalization of the criminal justice system. There are a variety of services that are offered by these courts, they include;
Crisis intervention: this is a judicial process which involves activities aimed at helping the convicted persons to regain their bio-psychological stability. The courts develop individualized programs depending on the assessment done on the persons sentenced under the court. The aim of crisis intervention is to ensure that the convicted person is able to relate properly with the society and that his interpersonal skills can be improved (Berman, & John, 2005).
Probation: the probation process includes supervision of an individual’s character by a court officer in order to ensure that he attains the conditions that have been set to him by the court. A court can extend the probation from a jail term and can also subject a convict to probation without a jail term.
Mental health courts sentence an individual’s to a probation expecting them to behave like other normal persons (especially) during the probation period. Also, the courts may subject a convict to probation giving him strict orders not to cause any harm on the persons and/or property near him (Redlich, Allison D. et al. 2005).
Parole case loads: parole is closely antagonized with probation. The main difference is that in probation, the courts set out the conditions that the convicted persons have to fulfill during the time of probation. On the other hand, a parole is a situation where the courts release a convict after proclaiming that he will fulfill some conditions which lead to his release (Sarah, and Darius, 2012).
Mental health courts allow for persons with psychiatric problems to declare that they will fulfill the conditions before releasing them. The courts must justify that the convict is fully aware of the repercussions of the declaration and that the convict makes such declarations without being coerced (Council of State Governments 2005).
How do these services benefit the prisoners?
The deinstitutionalization carried out by the mental health courts is beneficial to the prisoners in different ways.
Freedom of movement: prisoners who are deinstitutionalized by the mental health courts are able to gain their freedom of movement. While this may be limited movement (sometimes the courts may withhold international transport documents), the movements made by the prisoners is less confined than the movements of prisoners within the prison walls (Berman, & John, 2005).
Freedom of interaction: deinstitutionalized person have more liberty to interact with the outside society. The interaction is important in building the career and other life skills of the prisoner. The prisoners are also able to re-enter the society earlier than in other normal courts (Sarah, and Darius, 2012).
Bio-psychology therapy: as noted above, the courts enroll the convicts into bio-psychology therapy which is designed with an aim of managing their psychiatric position. Success of this process is a considering factor in whether the society will be able to have confidence on the convict again. The therapy also ensures that the person can regain his normal legal status including ability to own property, right to sue and be sued among other legal status. For persons who were earlier not able to start their own families, a successful therapy will give them this chance (Sarah, and Darius, 2012).
How do these compare to the services already available through the existing criminal justice system?
Rehabilitation of character versus rehabilitation of psychiatric condition
The developments in criminal justice system have been insisting on the rehabilitation of character. Thus, a person who has been in custody is expected to re-enter the society as a clean person who is ready for responsible citizenship. On the other hand, persons who undergo bio-psycho therapy is expected to regain his psychological stability as well as regaining good morals that are paramount in the re-entering of the prisoners into the society once they have completed their prison terms (Goldkamp, and Cheryl 2000).
Mental health courts versus other problem solving courts
Mental health’s courts are having the mandate of ensuring that crime which is committed by persons who have psychiatric problems have been minimized. As explained through the paper, the officers must exercise their duty bearing in their mind that the convicts do not have stable mental condition. However, other problem solving courts carry out their duties without minding about the mental stability of the convicts (Council of State Governments 2005).
Institutionalized vs. deinstitutionalized sentences
The normal criminal justice system has options for both institutionalized and deinstitutionalized sentences for convicts. Institutionalized sentences are situations where the convicts have to serve their term within the confines of prison walls. On the other hand, mental health courts are overly deinstitutionalized system where the convicts are sentenced to community service and other sentences that do not include prison terms (Berman, & John, 2005).
Do the research findings support the establishment of more mental health service programs to imprisoned mentally ill populations?
According to research findings in Council of State Governments Justice Center’s article, mental health courts have proven to reduce the tension on convicts who are already prisoners of their own actions. The report contends that there has been a challenge of finding parole in these cases since the level of understanding among the convicts is low (Council of State Governments 2005). Judge Goodman of Indiana who has been championing deinstitutionalization of criminal cases against mentally challenged persons argues that, the PAIR program which was initiated in 1990’s was key to identifying ways to help individual convicts (Sarah, and Darius, 2012).
Bureau of Justice Assistance has indicated that the 120 courts which it oversees are able to come up with solutions faster since the judges are aware of the mental conditions of the convicts are specially trained in dealing with the case. The judges are more empowered in basing their judgment on the report of the psychological officer dealing with the case (Council of State Governments 2005).
What can be done to improve these services further?
One of the key issues that will help the success of this deinstitutionalized system is staffing. The system requires personalized programs and attention in each case. This can only be achieved by ensuring that there are enough people on the ground to develop the programs and monitor the movements of persons in probation and/ or parole (Goldkamp, and Cheryl 2000). In increasing the size of staff, the responsible authorities should consider qualified [persons in psychology and criminology. A balance between these two key professionalisms that are required will help in attaining the two main objectives of the system;
Rehabilitating the character of the convicts
Rehabilitating the mental condition of the convicts (Berman, & John, 2005)
References
Berman, Greg; John Feinblatt (2005). Good Courts: The Case for Problem-Solving Justice. New York, New York: The New Press
Council of State Governments (2005). A Guide to Mental Health Court Design and Implementation. New York, NY: Council of State Governments, 2005.
Goldkamp, John S. and Cheryl Irons-Guynn (2000). Bureau of Justice Assistance. Emerging Judicial Strategies For the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice
Redlich, Allison D. et al. (2005). The Second Generation of Mental Health Courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2005 Dec Vol 11(4)
Sarah, R. and Darius, W. (2012). ‘Diversion of Offenders with Mental Disorders: Mental Health Courts’ 1 Web Journal of Current Legal Issues
Dehydration Water affects nearly all body systems as well as all dimensions of health
Dehydration
Introduction
Water affects nearly all body systems as well as all dimensions of health. Physical health is highly dependant on provision of water and other minerals in adequate amounts. Water as described by Ross, Turner & Insel (2009) is the simplest nutrient chemically and also one of the most important. One is able to survive for a long time without some essential nutrients in the body or even go without food for a couple of days, but is not able to survive without water. This is because many roles in the body are associated with many functions in the body. These roles include transport of wastes and nutrients, control of body temperature and joints lubrication. The body is made up of approximately 60% water and so the constant intake of water is recommended for all to maintain adequate hydration levels. Water is not only found in beverages, but also in other foods including fruits and vegetables. Though the body makes water through chemical reactions, additional intake is required for the necessary functions to be met.
Functions of Water in the Body
As explored by Ross et al (2009) and Nix (2005), water provides a solvent in which chemical reactions take place in the body. These reactions are termed as hydrolytic because their activity requires water. Hydrolytic reactions in the body are essential for metabolic processes to take place including those involved with tissue building and energy production. Water is found in blood and other secretions in the body. For this reason, it circulates in the body transporting oxygen as well as other necessary nutrients. Metabolism is essential to ensure cell survival. Oxygen and other elements required for metabolic processes are transported through water. By-products and excretions are also transported from the cell to the various organs in the body responsible for their excretion to avoid toxicity.
Water is essential for the regulation of body temperature. As the temperature increases in the surrounding, water is excreted from the body though the skin in form of sweat so as to maintain body temperature. It is however vital to note that water loss should be supplement by water intake in prevention of dehydration. Spaces within tissues are filled with water to give the body a form and structure. Apart from blood, muscles are tissues that contain the highest percentage of water. The other function that is played by water in muscles is the provision of lubrication for ease in locomotion (Nix, 2005).
Effects of Dehydration
Dehydration is a major cause of death worldwide particularly in infants as well as the weak elderly (Ross et al, 2009). In infants, dehydration is caused by gastrointestinal infections that cause excessive vomiting and diarrhoea. These symptoms when prolonged lead to severe water loss from the body. If untreated, this water loss that is equivalent to 20% weight loss can lead to a coma and ultimately death. Dehydration also causes the extensive damage of the skin compromising its activity of protecting the body from loss of water.
Dehydration as discussed by Ross et al (2009) reduces physical and mental activities of an individual. Dark urine, dry mouth, Fatigue and headache are the early signs of dehydration. The darkening of urine to a dark colour is attributed by the body’s attempt to conserve water by reabsorption in the kidney.
Effects of Electrolytes
Electrolytes are chemicals that become ion in when in solution. Potassium, sodium and chloride are the main electrolytes that control water balance in he body. Their regulation is essential for the normal functioning of the body. Sodium ion is the major cation in extracellular fluid which is excreted in urine when in excess. While potassium is the main cation found in intracellular fluid. Sodium standardizes the quantity of water in the body. A high increase of sodium in comparison to water can be due to extreme water loss through diarrhoea and vomiting, little or no water intake and due to a kidney disease. Alternatively, a decrease of sodium occurs when there is a high ratio of water in relation to water. Contrary to sodium, potassium decrease is caused by excessive loss of water through vomiting, diarrhoea and sweating. Chloride ions are the major negative involved in water and acid balance in the body (Nix, 2005).
Effects of Caffeine and Alcohol
As discussed by Kovacs in the article “Dehydration – A major cause of decreased human sports performance!” caffeinated drinks as well as alcohol in increase water loss from the body through urine. These drinks should most especially be avoided if one is in hot climate or during exercise. This is because in addition to water loss through urine after taking alcohol and caffeinated drinks, high temperature and exercise also lead to loss of water through sweat. Although most people have a tendency of taking caffeinated drinks before exercise for energy than they tend to take alcohol, one should note that overnight drinking can lead to excessive dehydration during a morning work out. Therefore, high levels of water intake should be observed after taking caffeinated drinks and alcohol.
Preventing Dehydration
The best and most simple way to avoid dehydration as explored in the article “Dehydration – A major cause of decreased human sports performance!” is the constant intake of fluids. Water is sufficient to replace all the fluids lost during exercise, increase in temperature and in the event of gastrointestinal infections that cause diarrhoea and vomiting. However, water alone is not able to replace other minerals that are lost during dehydration. When one is involved in strenuous exercises it is advisable to take other fluids containing sodium, potassium and chlorides.
When taking alcohol or caffeinated drinks, one should ensure that they take lots of fluids to replace water that is lost through urine. In case of water loss as a result of gastrointestinal infections, one is required to increase the intake of water. The simplest way to deal with loss of water and electrolytes in this case is to take a mixture of water and pure salt or sugar to replenish their loss (Ross et al, 2009).
References
Kovacs, M. “Dehydration – A major cause of decreased human sports performance!” Sports Nutrition. 2000.
Nix, S. (2005). Williams’ Basic Nutrition and Diet Therapy. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby. Print.
Ross, D., Turner, E. & Insel, P. (2009). Discovering Nutrition. Canada: Jones & Bartlett. Print.
Deforestation Concepts and Descriptions
Deforestation
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Assignment 1: Literature Review
Deforestation
Concepts and Descriptions
Conceptually, deforestation is the is the removal of tree stands, which converts the land into other land uses or results into a bareness; for example, clearing of forestland to ranches, farms, or urban use (Durham & Painter, 1998). Similarly, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) considers deforestation as a massive clearing of the Earth’s forest, which often results to degradation and reduction of the quality of land. UNDP has reiterated that the current rate of global deforestation is alarming and calls for immediate and rigorous intervention. It warns that if no proper measure is put in place, the word risks losing its forest endowments in just a hundred years to come. Also, a report by Cardenas (2008), adds that the world is not just losing the forest cover, but a complex mixture of natural resources including the biodiversity, land productivity are subsequently deteriorating.
Global deforestation mainly affects the world’s temperate and tropical rainforest, which form the highest percentage of forest cover. The rate and extent of forest loss have proved beyond any reasonable doubt to be an urgent environmental problem. In this regard, the issue jeopardizes people’s livelihoods, intensifies global warming, and threatens the world’s plant and animal species (Lambin & Geist, 2006). Further, Andersen reports that, millions of the world population has a direct reliance on forest resources through small-scale agriculture, harvesting forest products, hunting, and gathering. Moreover, deforestation poses severe social problems, which sometimes results to violent conflicts as the different parties fight to tap the scarce resources.
Forest transformation and conversion are majorly due to human actions in relation to direct or indirect utilization, which over the years have continued to be profound (Boahene, 1998). Tress are cleared, fragmented, or converted to agricultural lands, infrastructure, and human settlements. Originally, as Lambin and Geist (2006) put it, more than half the land of United States, nearly all of Europe, three-quarters of Canada, and vast lands of the world were under forest. However, the coverage has been removed to a large extent by wood fuel extractions, industrial usage, and farming.
Quantitative and Qualitative Data on Forest and Deforestation
The Earth’s total area covered by the forest is over four billion hectares, which quantitatively gives an average per capita of 0.6 hectares (Vajpeyi, 2001). Though, only five countries in the world are rich in forest cover, which include Canada, Brazil, the Russian Federation, China, and United States of America. Their areas under the forest are more than half of the territories; however, the vastness in forest is because the countries have developed appropriate policies and laws to monitor forest product utilization (Lambin & Geist, 2006). Moreover, almost ten countries in the world lack areas covered by forest while additional 54 countries have less than 10% land covered (Margulis, 2004).
More than one and a half of the world forests are gone. Unfortunately, every year, additional 16 million hectares are lost, which worsen the natural state of the environment. UNDP estimates that just about 22% of the Earth’s old growth remains, especially the boreal forest of Canada and Alaska, boreal forest in Russia, the Guyana Shield, and the Amazon rainforest in the Northwest Basin. However, the anthropological influence in forest cover continues to expand and accelerate in the remaining undisturbed forest, which also result to declining quality of the forest remnants (Margulis, 2004).
Deforestation rate has shown signs of decreasing, nonetheless, still alarmingly high especially in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, which still rely on wood fuel as an energy source. Again, evidences show that, the tropical rainforest of South America and Africa are leading in the rates of deforestation (Lambin & Geist, 2006). According to Pearce (1994), agriculture was the main reason for deforestation in Brazil and Indonesia. Conversely, other uses or natural causes account for the loss, for example, in the 1990s, up to 13 million hectares of forest disappeared in the world due to non-agricultural factors. Also, since 2000, Australia has lost huge tracts of forest as a result of drought and forest fires (Costa & Pires, 2010).
Tropical deforestation is the most detrimental aspect of global change in environmental issues such as climate, hydrology, and global biogeochemical cycles (Boahene, 1998). Rainforest in the Amazon Basin is the largest single Tropical forest of the world, but sadly, the vast coverage in Brazil has the highest rate of forest loss of about 1.5-2.0 × 106 hectares per year (Costa & Pires, 2010).
Explicitly, according to Costa and Pires (2010), South America suffered the greatest net loss between the years of 2000 and 2010, by deforestation rate of 4.0 million hectares of cover lost every year. Africa followed closely with a rate of about 3.4 million hectares lost annually. In the same decade, Oceania had a net loss of 700000 ha every year, mainly because of the severe drought that struck Australia. On the other hand, in Central and North America, area covered by the forest in 2010 was estimated to be the same as in 2000. Fortunately, the forest cover in Europe expanded, though on a slower rate (700000 ha annually) in relation to 1990s (900000 ha annually). However, China experienced a net gain of greater than 2.2 million ha annually in the same period of 2000-2010. However, Southeast Asia and the Southern parts continued to register net losses in forest cover (Costa & Pires, 2010).
Causes of Deforestations
According to Kummer and Turner (1994), agriculture is the direct cause of deforestation, of which subsistence farming accounts for about 45% while commercial agriculture accounts for 32% of the global deforestation. Again, industrial logging for wood processing and as fuel energy is responsible for massive rate of deforestation (Sunderlin & Center for International Forestry Research, 1996). Globalization that leads to worldwide proliferations of ideas, commodities, capital, and labor coupled with the rise in urbanizations, especially in the developing countries has endangered the world forest cover. In Africa and Asia to be specific, the exacerbated rates of deforestation are due to overreliance on wood fuel as a source of household energy. Additionally, other natural causes such as drought, forest fires, pest, and diseases have also contributed to the loss of huge tracts of the Earth’s forest.
Effects of Deforestations
Deforestation destroys wildlife habitats, which leads to decline or extinction of the world’s biodiversity, for instance, about 137 species of animals, plants, and insects are lost in a single day because of rainforest deforestation; cumulatively, adding up to 50000 species per year. Additionally, soil loss through erosions and subsequent land degradations affects world food production (Vajpeyi, 2001).
Deforestation also causes an imbalance in the hydrological cycle due to increased moisture loss from bare soil surfaces. Sadly, deforestation is the main cause of climate change and global warming due to loss of carbon sequesters. Therefore, greenhouse gases, particularly Carbon dioxide accumulate in the atmosphere at high concentrations, making global warming inevitable. It is human beings who suffer the real repercussion as their livelihoods and welfare is tampered with. Furthermore, forest cover is a surrogate to economic value of a country, which when lost leads to economic losses (Costa & Pires, 2010).
In conclusion, forest offers invaluable economic services and direct marketable good and service to the various countries of the world. Deforestation is a worldwide issue that should be address at the country, regional, and global levels. Even though worldwide campaigns have been used to reduce the rates of forest loss, effort still needs to be put in place to avoid future impacts on human livelihoods, welfare, environment, and the global economy. Therefore, appropriate and effective mitigation measures must be put in place to curb unsustainable exploitation of forest resources, both at individual and industrial levels.
Assignment 2: White Paper
Deforestation and Mitigation
Executive Summary
Forests are very important to everyone. They directly or indirectly support millions of persons in the world and over 80% of the Earth’s biological diversity. Again, forests drive local and global, hydrological, and climatic cycles, therefore; they contribute to climate change when cut down at a rate exceeding their regeneration rates (Tucker & Townshend 2000). Furthermore, a lot of scientific studies assert that forest destructions and deforestations are the third most contributors to greenhouse gases that cause global warming and climate change. Also, there are proofs that deforestations contribute thrice the greenhouse gases released from global transport sector (Potter, 1999).
Forests are biological resources, which are very sensitive to unsustainable exploitations because if the rate of cutting down the stands exceed the rate of natural regeneration, then decline in forest cover results. In this regard, forest management and conservation become mandatory if humanity still wants to tap the values from the natural resources. Therefore, a workable idea is to conserve forest carefully by avoiding forest cuttings, illegal loggings, and unscrupulous forest extraction methods. Alternatively, tree planting should be embraced as a technique to replace the felled stands, however, some planted trees grow very slowly that delay forest regenerations (Kummer & Turner 1994).
As human population continues to grow, with the advancement in world industrial activities, deforestation will continue to exacerbate to severe levels. Simultaneously, droughts and increased instances of forest fires worsen the situation of climate change and increase the vulnerability of the world population to the food crisis. Therefore, to mitigate deforestation, the reasons behind tree cutting must be understood, and then plausible alternatives adopted to reduce direct reliance on the sensitive ecosystem.
That is why; this paper explores the potential strategies that must be implemented to curb deforestation. The best approach is to address the human causes of deforestations because they are the main contributors (Tucker & Townshend 2000). In addition to this, deforestation of tropical rainforest being the highest in the world, particularly in the developing countries, mitigation measures must be prioritize in African, Asian, and Latin America.
Introduction
Forest degradation occurs when trees in forested regions are subjected to land use change, for instance, an area covered by forest is converted to ranches, urban buildings, settlements, infrastructure, or for agricultural purposes. According to Costa and Pires (2010), forest loss affects natural system cycles, which include water, weather, soil, and atmosphere circulations.
Deforestation has a lot of negative impacts to the world population, environment, and the economy. Notably, loss of forest cover is based on social, economic, and political grounds; hence these factors form the bottom line of formulating strategies to address deforestation. Logging operations, for wood and paper products, have resulted to countless tree stands cut, particularly when the action is illegal (Tucker & Townshend 2000). Moreover, commercial trade on wood products, for example, hardwood from Central and Western Africa, threatens the long-term existence of the African rainforest.
Climate change and deforestation calls for effective and careful management tools to save both biological and geophysical functions of forests. Suggested measures include limited fragmentation, landscape management, education, and regulation, creating protected forest zone amongst others like adopting green energy (United Nations Development Programme, 2000). Further, strict laws and policies on forest resources must be in place to heavily prosecute illegal loggers and scrapping out impunity when environmental crimes are committed.
Factors Driving Deforestation
Causes of deforestation are profoundly multiple on the local, regional, and global scale. However, all the drivers of deforestation are based on social, economic, and political factors. Social factors define the society and how they relate to the forests, for example, most small-scale farmers and hunter-gatherer communities directly relate to the forest. On the other hand, economic factors relate to the levels of industrialization and how the industries source their inputs from the forest while political factors define the territorial boundaries and regulations put in place to monitor forest exploitation.
All over the world, intensive and extensive agriculture have led to the conversion of vast lands previously covered by forest. Furthermore, commercial trade on forest resources and illegal logging contribute to loss of tree stands. Other causes of deforestation include overexploitation, forest fires, wood fuel extraction, industrial growth, urban sprawl. It is worth noting that, all the possible sources are categorized as either natural or human, with the latter being the most severe and accelerating.
Mitigating Deforestation
Mitigation measures are the remedial interventions that eliminate or reduce the current rates of deforestation to ensure recovery of forest resources. When the lost forest is restored, biodiversity, soil, climate, and human welfare are improved to the better. Therefore, solving deforestation should be based on feasible and practical policies and conservation measures to necessitate sustainability and restoration (Kummer & Turner 1994). Several strategies that can be used to restore the lost treasure include:
Sustainable Agricultural Practices
Sustainability in agriculture involves integrated systems that incorporate crops and tree, particularly known as agroforestry. The mechanism ensures that farmers benefit from both the crops and tree stands. However, the practice has not been much developed in many parts of the world despite the benefits that come with it. Trees in croplands have multipurpose; for example, they serve as shelterbelts, enrich the soil, reduce soil erosion, improve yields, and create a microclimate. To appropriately commission such projects, countries should employ communities or public, private partnership (PPP) with the guide of agricultural and forestry agencies.
Monitoring Deforestation
Through aerial photography and satellite imagery, incidences of illegal logging can be monitored, which forms the base line of prosecuting the environmental crimes. Further, the monitoring and surveillance will necessitate a creation of a database on forest resource through hotspot analysis to guide prioritization of interventions (Tucker & Townshend 2000). Digital analysis done on satellite imagery has to great extent reduced deforestation in Brazilian Amazon.
Reforestation and Forest Plantations
Reforestation is planting of trees where the indigenous forest had been disturbed. To ensure the effectiveness, fast growing trees are encouraged, though; care must be taken to avoid the proliferation of the planted trees at an ecological expense (Potter, 1999). For example, impact assessment of most eucalyptus species has to be carried out to match the tree requirements and the ecology of a particular area. Again, forest plantations are important because they provide the industries with materials inputs and to reduce reliance on natural forest for wood products. Plantations have a yield capacity of 5-10 times that of the natural forests so it is essential to plant and manage fast growing tree species (Kummer & Turner 1994).
Forest Management
Management involves conservation and consideration of sustainability in utilization of forest resources. Secondly, management also means protection. When the forest is severely destroyed, utilization is ceased to create protected forest zones (Kummer & Turner 1994). These zones are out of bounds for all forms of use as the tree stands are left on their natural state. On the other hand, conservation allows people to tap the resources from the forest but, in an ecologically sustainable manner. Also, nature conservancies have been used in many parts of the world to raise endangered plant species and to raise seedlings. In Asia and some parts of Africa such as Senegal, communities based organizations raise seedlings and sell to the forestry agencies or donate to green schools and youth organizations.
Land Use Planning
All development must be environmental friendly, for example, growth of urban centers should not compromise the growth of indigenous forest. Instead, green towns need to integrate trees and concrete infrastructures (green structures). On the other hand, urban sprawl can be reduced by developing the rural areas. In a nutshell, before any land use is converted to another, precautionary measures should be put in place for planning and avoiding future consequences (Potter, 1999).
Eco-Forestry and Community Forestry
Only selected tree should be cut to ensure sustainable exploitation. This technique has minimal damages and gives the forest adequate time to recover. This selectivity permits commercial timber extraction in an ecologically sound scale. Furthermore, community forestry is done on local levels to allow the community to participate and manage local forests (Tucker & Townshend 2000).
Environmental Litigation
Laws and policies that govern forest resources must be complied with, failure to which, the offender faces the legal structure without going impunity. The litigation process must clearly outline the fines involved ensuring that the offenders pay as the civil laws or Acts entrench. Similarly, public policies should be developed to create incentives among the people for conservation and sustainable utilization of forests (Kummer & Turner 1994).
Adopting Alternative Sources of Energy
Wood fuel extraction is the world major cause of deforestation, meaning that if people divert to alternative energy source, the forest benefits. The most efficient and clean energy is solar, which can be installed even to the remote households (Potter, 1999). Again, relevant policies should govern charcoal production, which a significant contributor to tree cuttings, particularly in the poverty stricken areas.
Conclusion
Deforestation is a worldwide environmental issue that have led to complex network of problems, which can be trickled down to land degradation, climate change, and global warming, loss of biodiversity, reduces renewable resources, loss of human wellbeing, and livelihoods. Notably, loss of forest negatively affects the valuable ecosystem services, which are life supporting systems. The conversions of natural forest to other land use are caused by manmade and natural causes, the former being very accelerating. To curb future consequences, mitigation measures must be implemented and sustained. The tropical and temperate rainforest are the most threatened forest ecosystems in the world, and, therefore, prompt interventions must be implemented. Conclusively, reducing deforestation will benefit the world population, environment, and the global economy. Even though worldwide campaigns have been used to reduce the rates of forest loss, effort still needs to be put in place to avoid future impacts.
References
Andersen, L. E. (2002). The dynamics of Deforestation and Economic Growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.
HYPERLINK “http://www.bibme.org/” o “Edit this item” Boahene, K. (1998). The Challenge of Deforestation In Tropical Africa: Reflections On Its Principal Causes, Consequences And Solutions. Land Degradation & Development, 9(3), 247-258.
Cardenas, H. O. G. (2008). Causes and Consequences of Deforestation and Land-Cover Change in Rural Communitites of Western Mexico.
HYPERLINK “http://www.bibme.org/” o “Edit this item” Costa, M. H., & Pires, G. F. (2010). Effects Of Amazon And Central Brazil Deforestation Scenarios On The Duration Of The Dry Season In The Arc Of Deforestation. International Journal of Climatology, 30(13), 1970-1979.
Durham, W. H., & Painter, M. (1998). The Social Causes of Environmental Destruction in Latin America. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
HYPERLINK “http://www.bibme.org/” o “Edit this item” Kummer, D. M., & Turner, B. L. (1994). The Human Causes of Deforestation in Southeast Asia. BioScience, 44(5), 323.
Lambin, E. F., & Geist, H. (2006). Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts. Berlin: Springer.
Margulis, S. (2004). Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
Palo, M., & Vanhanen, H. (2000). World Forests from Deforestation to Transition?. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pearce, D. W., & Brown, K. (1994). The Causes of Tropical Deforestation: The Economic and Statistical Analysis of Factors Giving Rise to the Loss of the Tropical Forests. Vancouver : UBC Press.
Potter, C. S. (1999). Terrestrial Biomass and the Effects of Deforestation on the Global Carbon Cycle. BioScience, 49(10), 769.
Sunderlin, W. D., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., & Center for International Forestry Research. (1996). Rates and Causes of Deforestation in Indonesia: Towards a Resolution of the Ambiguities. Jakarta, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research.
Tucker, C. J., & Townshend, J. R. (2000). Strategies for monitoring tropical deforestation using satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6-7), 1461-1471.
United Nations Development Programme. (2000). World Resources 2000-2001: People and Ecosystems : the Fraying Web of Life. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Vajpeyi, D. K. (2001). Deforestation, Environment, and Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis. Westport, Conn : Praeger.
