Recent orders

William Shakespeare’s

Name

Professor’s name

Course

Date

How William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Winter Tale, and King Lear Represent Rulers and Parents

Introduction

Shakespeare is arguably one of the most celebrated ever to exist. The works of the revered England wordsmith were accurate in capturing the spirits of his time. His works have been translated into over 100 languages and some of the words which he coined still shape how people speak. His plays, Hamlet, Winter Tale, and King Lear, are no different. He makes reference to the role of kings and queens as leaders and as parents. Through taking a look at the relationships that children share with their parents, who are queens and kings, one understands the consequences of parenting on children. In Hamlet, for instance, the role of parents is significant throughout the plot as they inform both the underlying and apparent plot. The parents drive the actions of the children leading to unexpected plot twists. It also makes the plays more interesting as the audience will witness the tragic turn of events and interactions between children and parents take place. In King Lear, Shakespeare uses parent-child relationships to build the themes of love and rejection as the King begins to push away his daughter. In Winter Tale, Shakespeare also explores different kinds of relationships between family members, spouses, and friends hence building the themes of love and friendship. This essay talks about the important qualities that most good rulers possess. Furthermore, the text explores how those qualities helped or hindered the relationships the rulers had with their children.

Kinship and Parenthood in William Shakespeare’s King Lear

According to William Shakespeare’s King Lear, justice, compassion, and integrity are some of an effective king’s most significant character traits. In the play, the King comes off as more of a physical evidence of strength rather than a United Government. The King is usually a representative of God on earth hence he serves as an example of behavior for the subjects that look up to their king for hope, guidance, and strength. If a king does not have essential components demanding kingly behavior and the authority of the traits, his subjects tend to increasingly turn towards deception, violence, and treachery as a means of government. In the first scene, Lear comes off as a strong ruler. His plan being to divide the kingdom equally among his three daughters seems rather self-serving and short-sighted. The decision led to him placing his two son-in-laws Cornwall and Albany, in charge of safeguarding the outlying sections of the kingdom. The one single benefit that came from the division led to various problems. Lear abdicates his responsibilities and purpose and, at the same time, is creating chaos. To attain the goal, Genoril, Cordelia, and Reagan are left with no option but to carry out a love test to help them determine their inheritance. In all places, division of labor comes with its own share of risks, but even before the action gets a chance to create diversity, Lear establishes competition which further complicates an already dangerous decision.

In nature, competitions end with a winner and a loser. Cordelia ends up losing after declining to participate in the game. Lear also loses after he retires and abdicates his role as a king. It is impossible for Cordelia to be a Ling without a kingdom. The country which is set to be subdivided and will have less principalities will not have the strength and unity to survive as separate entities. Insurrection and civil war tend to be always the inevitable repercussions of Lear’s actions. The loves test forces Goneril and Regan to continue competing against their younger sister, who was favored. Eventually, a dead conflict arises amongst Lear and his daughters. The long-standing competition that existed between the sisters sparked conflict amongst the ruling faction hence dividing the kingdom even further. Dissent was in the air even before Cordelia returned. In the second Act (II), the report about Cornwall and Albany strife by Curan help with the illustration that King Lear’s move to divide the kingdom was huge mistake (II.1.10). At this point, there does not appear to be any conflict between Regan and Goneril. Additionally, because of her banishment, Cordelia is out of the scene. Although Albany and Cornwall do not demonstrate any signs of being uneasy, there is a clear discord with the potential of escalating into a conflict and maybe civil war (Park, 194). Eventually, Reagan and Goneril join forces against a common enemy, who is their own father. It is reasonable to assume that Regan and Goneril would eventually turn their anger against each other after having disposed of Cordelia. In V.1.55-69, it is evident that Edmund was banking on this event as he let it be known that between Regan and Cordelia, he would marry the one that would emerge winner in the struggle for absolute control.

Kinship and Parenthood in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet

One of the character traits of a good leader that Shakespeare makes reference has to do with having influence on people. Undoubtedly, the leaders in Hamlet display influence as they have an influence on their children. One of the rulers that play an important parental role is Old Hamlet. The King had a significant role in his life. He was also a major driving force for Hamlet’s insanity. This incident sets off the play’s plot. Hamlet was overcome by the love he was feeling for his father. Anger drives Hamlet into a plot against Claudius in the entire play. After the death of his father, Getrude, decides to get married to Claudias. In doing so, Getrude gives Hamlet more reason to distrust women and make them feel weak. The relationship between Hamlet and his mother is strained by the fact that she decided to get remarried to Claudius. Hamlet seems to have an unusual interest in his mother’s love life and sexuality. Her actions had led her son Hamlet into being disgusted by the entire idea of her as a sexual being. Hamlet felt that she had betrayed his father by getting married to his mother. This drove a wedge between Hamlet and his mother even further.

When a parent dies, one requires all the care and support they can get, but his mother rushed into getting married. She did not spend time with him after the King died. She needed to be there for him and remind him that someone loved and cared for him. On the other hand, his father, King Hamlet, loved his son just like any father does. Their relationship might not have been perfect, but Hamlet was proud of his father and admired him enough to look up to him (Zamir, 23). Hamlet’s life changed significantly after he learned about his father’s death. His father’s death struck him hard. He left like a part of his life had been stripped from him because of the bond they shared.

Kinship and Parenthood in William Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale

Children play a significant role in this play. The relationship between children and their parents are mostly at the centre of all dramas. This is no surprise, given the significant role that this relationship plays in everyday life. As regards, parents-son relationship, Leontes and Hermione share a relationship of good nature with their son. Despite the fact that Hermione’s jealousy is growing, Leontes is passionate in the way he speaks about him.

As parents, Hermione and Leontes both have very different and unique qualities as parents. Hermione has a strong character in the play, a trait that makes her a strong and good mother. Leontes on the other hand possesses qualities that are totally different. His mistrust and jealousy towards his wife Hermione, and best friend Polixenes, alongside his severe paranoia made him a rather poor parent. His attitude makes him comes off as a poor parent. Leontes’s mistrust towards his wife has a detrimental effect on them as a whole. Leontes, however, starts to redeem himself as the play continues. As a parental unit, Hermoine and Leontes are not very effective. The reason behind this is that they are raising a natural-born princess who cannot have it any other way. When the play starts, Leontes has only one son called Mamillius. Leontes sees him as the best thing to ever happen to his life. Shakespeare views Leontes as being a good and stable parent as the play continues to unfold, we learn that this is not truly always the case.

Conclusion

In closing, throughout the plays Hamlet, Winter Tale, and King Lear, William Shakespeare paints a unique picture about the characteristics of a good ruler. Shakespeare uses the relationship between the main characters in his play to push the plot further forward. One of the character traits of a good leader that Shakespeare makes reference has to do with having influence on people. Justice, compassion, and integrity are some of the most significant character traits of an effective king, according to the play King Lear. In the Winter’s Tale as parents, Hermione and Leontes both have very different and unique qualities as parents. Hermione has a strong character in the play, a trait that makes her a strong and good mother. Leontes on the other hand possesses qualities that are totally different. His mistrust and jealousy towards his wife Hermione, and best friend Polixenes, alongside his severe paranoia made him a rather poor parent.

Works Cited

Park, Eonjoo. “Sympathy for Old Age in King Lear.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews 34.3 (2021): 193-198.

Zamir, Tzachi, ed. Shakespeare’s Hamlet: philosophical perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Cultural and Ethnic Studies. Anthony Giddens identity Project and cultural identity

Cultural and Ethnic Studies

Anthony Giddens identity Project and cultural identity

By modernity, Anthony Giddens is not referring to the modern times that we are currently living in but rather the times that have already been influenced by constant developments that take place daily in the society. This aspect influences some of the choices of people who are in a dilemma about their identity. Additionally, these types of people may also tend to enquire about important stuff about their lives (Giddens 1991, p. 23). Some of the most common questions they may seek to find out about themselves include what to wear, what to do with their free time, how to deal with their personal relationships, or how to behave at the place of work. External influences play a big role on humans’ identity because in most cases, people try to act as they feel and if they would make them fit in the world. The extent to which individuals personally decide on their own identity is compared to when it is imposed on them through the external influences (Brockmeier 2001, p. 69). This aspect is considered more often unlike an awareness matter or consciousness. In the traditional society, the set up social order that would help humans in making decisions about their self-identity is different from the modern world where a person is left to make his or her own decisions. Every day people are faced with rational questions about which they are or how they should be or act; however, as they live in their societies, most of these questions are usually answered whether discursively or through social behavior (Brockmeier 2001, p. 87).

Giddens suggests that the society as a whole is to blame for the kind of individual that person is. This is because humans, just like animals, adapt to the environment. The cultural patterns around the person will have an influence, as the one will try to act as others do or try to be what he or she believes the society would approve of (Czarniawska 1997, p. 58). Additionally, in the traditional world, religion played a major role in influencing people’s choices and behaviors. Over the years, religion has changed, and new types have come up. Some religions may also condone certain life choices and even give room to diverse sexuality, which may lead one as an individual to believe that maybe the act is not so bad after all (Czarniawska 1997, p. 67). Giddens blames the social changes that have taken place in the modern society for the way people choose to act or according to their social behaviors. He stipulates that the change must not have happened on a day, but must be something that has been gradually changing over the past years, and the society may just not have realized it. These changes are fostered by both micro and macro forces.

The Media and Cultural Identity

In the same context, Giddens is of the opinion that the media plays an influential role on people’s relationships, especially in the current world. He states that people are so dependent on the media and often rely on the information that it gives. It could be gossip about certain people, relationships, fictional programs, comedies, or family drama. The media, in this case, has been significant in bringing out the aspect of cultural identity throughout the world. There are various forms of media, which effectively bring out the aspect of cultural identity. Some of the common forms in this sense include advertising, web based, print media, and the audiovisual. In talking about the web based media form, the most common type is the Internet. Generally, the media brings out the aspect of cultural representation, according to Anthony Giddens. One of the most common types that can effectively bring out this aspect is advertising. In most cases, it takes up different forms, and it is also regarded as an essential aspect where people can pass particular information across. Additionally, advertising is a form of communication, which is essential in encouraging, persuading, or even manipulating a particular audience. In this case, the audience includes listeners, readers, viewers, or a particular group. The purpose of this type is to encourage the audience continue with a particular action. Alternatively, through the advertising, humans are able to identify their cultures and behaviors. This is the reason why Anthony Giddens came up with this notion. In his identity project, Giddens says that the world of advertising can also take up various forms, especially in its quest to pass the message across. In this case, the author points out the print media and web based one as some of the aspects which advertising would use. Generally, the world of advertising is broad (Giddens 1991, p. 63).

Print advertising

Print advertising is one of the most powerful forms of media that helps in getting the message across. The growing code switching occurrences phenomenon in advertising has generally led the rise of identity construction study through code switching advertisements. Alternatively, there have been views regarding identity and aspects of its construction with the use of language. Identity in this aspect can be marked through various similarities, representation and differences (Czarniawska 1997, p. 76). Generally, printing advertising plays a big role in today’s society especially in personality identification, which is seen as difficult and problematic in some cases. Two examples of this aspect are magazines and newspapers. Generally, magazines and newspapers are vital in changing people’s ideas and believe about various aspects of life. A magazine for example has various messages, which can determine a person’s perspectives in life. Some magazines can influence an individual either positively or negatively and in doing this, it is shaping the identity of the person. Newspapers are mostly informative. Although they do not directly influence a person’s identity, they play a key role in people’s opinion about certain aspect of life and by doing this; they are generally constructing the identity of the person.

How Identity is constructed

Anthony Giddens states that identity of a person is one’s own reflective understanding of his or her own biography. Additionally, the author claims that self-identity has aspects of continuity (Giddens 1991, 53). In saying this, he meant that this particular aspect could not be completely changed at will, but instead, it is a person’s reflective belief product about his or her own biography. Generally, ‘identity’ depicts the intersection that exists between media study and cultural institutions or the material culture. Additionally, it entails the study of language, representation, and meaning in texts production. The creation of identity is usually theorized via self-relation aspects to societal and culture.

Giddens views a stable identity aspect as a self-identity, which bases upon a person’s life account, influences, and actions, which make sense. Additionally, a person can explain this aspect to various people with a lot of ease. Generally, it explains a person’s past and is oriented upon an anticipated future (Sturken 2009, p. 56). Alternatively, a person’s identity does not reflect behavior, or this aspect is not seen as a very important one. However, it usually depends on the reactions of other people, but generally relies on the capacity or the ability to ensure that a particular narrative keeps on going. An individual’s biography, in case one wants to maintain an interaction, which is regular with other individuals on a daily basis world, cannot be wholly fictive. This aspect can continue to integrate events that happen in the external world. Additionally, it sorts them into going stories.

Historical Emergence of Identity and Individualism

An individual’s self-fixed sense through divine order of things that are fixed can generally define a person’s status, position, or a particular rank. In this case, individualism is the aspect of self-ownership and the ability to have the freedom to express feelings (Hall 1997, p. 78). It relates to identity in that identity in this perspective is connected through the ability to reason and rational processes.

Identity as a Project

Generally, Anthony Giddens viewed self-identity aspect as a project. In this case, he referred to it as the changes that occur in humans’ social life and in-world experiences (Sturken 2009, p. 98). Giddens states that the mechanisms of self-identity are shaped depending on the aspects of modernity. Other aspect, which defines identity, includes reorganization of space, time, disembodying mechanisms expansion and radical doubts. The aspect of self-identity among people entails uncertainties, trust, choices, risks, distant happenings of local life influences. The importance of mediated experiences depend biographical narratives and lifestyle choices (Giddens 1991, p. 33).

Approaches

Generally, there are two approaches which are dominant with regards to identity aspect by Anthony Giddens. They are essentialist and interactionist, also known as social constructionist.

In this case, essentialism entails the aspect where identity is generally a person’s essence; thus, fixed set of values, practices, and ideals remain to be defining characteristics. In most cases, this aspect would presume that the universe has a way of being a person, be it man or woman, black or white, homosexual or heterosexual (Berger 1974, p. 78).

The social constructionism or social interactionism is generally the theory of knowledge regarding the communication and sociology fields, which examine jointly, constructed understandings and world’s understanding. This aspect also assumes that a particular understanding, importance, and meaning are usually developed together. The social constructionism states that they are not separated within an individual, but in most cases, they are coordinated with other people. Some of the most important elements to the social constructionist theory are human beings assumptions that they can rationalize their own experiences by the aspect of creating social world model. It also checks on how this particular model functions. Additionally, there is the element of language being an essential system, which helps human beings in constructing realities (Woodward 1997, p. 45) The social interactionism theory also closely relates with the symbolic interactionism aspect/theory. In this case, the symbolic interactionism entails sociological perspectives, which are influential in various areas of this particular discipline.

The aspect of media in relation to these theories is relevant. In this case, the aspect of media (internet and advertisements) entails the general interplay that exists between sound, images, and technology. The idea behind online community is regarded as a social construct. The two theories encompass discursive communities’ aspects and social realities. Additionally, they portray the public sphere and anonymity in interactions.

The aspect of media and, in this case, advertisements, can categorically be related to the theory of social constructionism (Giddens 1991, p. 49). Social constructionism, being a theory of knowledge regarding the communication and sociology fields, examines jointly constructed understandings and world’s understanding, generally shares almost a similar notion with the aspect of advertising. These two aspects talk about communication aspect and the sociology field. Just like the social constructionism, advertisements also try to get an understanding with its viewers or listeners. The catch behind an advertisement model is an understanding of concepts and ideas.

References

Berger, J 1974, Ways of Seeing. London, Penguin

Brockmeier, J., & Carbaugh, D. A. 2001, Narrative and identity: studies in autobiography, self and culture. Philadelphia, Pa, Benjamin.

Czarniawska, B 1997, Narrating the organization: dramas of institutional identity. Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.

Dolby, N. E. 2001, Constructing race: youth, identity, and popular culture in South Africa. Albany, NY, State Univ. of New York Press.

Eagleton, T 1996, Literary Theory: An Introduction. Chapter 3- Sttucturalism and Semiotics. Oxford Blackwell; especially pages 79-85

Hall, S 1992, The Question of Cultural Identity in Stuart Hall & Tony McGrew (eds) Modernity and its Futures. London: Polity

Hall, S (ed) 1997, Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London, Sage: Introduction and Chapter

Sturken, M & Cartwright, L 2009, Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Chapter 1

Woodward, K 1997, Identity and difference, London: Sage

Tim O’Brien’s

Name

Professor’s name

Course

Date

How to Tell a True War Story-Tim O’Brien

Summary

Tim O’Brien’s How to Tell a True War Story (1990) is a story about love, memory, and sorrow. The story has nothing to do with war. Rather, it is about how the special ways through which dawn spreads when a person knows that they have to cross the river and enter the mountains, face their fears, and do things they are afraid of. The story explores the complicated relationship between storytelling and experience. The story is narrated from two perspectives. Half of the story is told by O’Brien, in his perspective as a soldier, as a repeat of various old Vietnam stories, while half of the story is narrated by his persona as a storyteller as a discussion about the art of storytelling. In summary, How to Tell a True War Story is about a anonymous narrator that talks about the actions and thoughts of Jimmy Cross in third person. Jim Cross serves as a lieutenant in an army unit that is on mission during the Vietnam war. Cross seems preoccupied with the letters that Martha sent him before joining the army. He dated the young lady before joining the army. He wonders whether she is a virgin or not. Cross thinks about the love he has for Martha, although the letters do not day of Martha feels the same way too.

The Theme of Truth

The theme of truth stands out as the overall theme in O’Brien’s story How to Tell a True War Story. In general, truth has to do with a fact of belief being accepted as true. According to O’Brien, something cannot be deemed true unless it feels as true. In this viewpoint, whether the action took place or not is not important because things happen all the time but that does not make them true. Towards the end, the audience feels disappointed and betrayed after realizing that Kiowa, Rat, and Mitchell Sander are not real but rather fictional creations. The author tries to pass across the message that despite the characters being made up, they carry with them great truth and meaning. True characters and stories do not necessarily need to fit perfectly into their character roles and narratives. In essence, the best way for the author to tell his Vietnam experience in the story is tell a story about the truth and not the happening truth. Tim O’Brien’s use of truth in this story indicates a shifting reality during war times. Without a doubt, O’Brien attempts to use story-truth to connect his audience with the subject of Vietnam. The attempt is unsuccessful because instead of connecting readers to the author’s experiences, it alienates them hence breaching the trust of writers and readers.

Setting

Tim O’Brien’s How to Tell a True War Story setting is in the Vietnam War at a time when Curt lemon has just lost his life in the mountains. This marks the beginning of the conflict encountered throughout the play since Curt Lemon succumbed because of war and the jungles of Vietnam that are always filled with traps. This death made Rat to let his emotions get the better of him. Curt’s death is the main reason why Tim told his story in the first place.

Characters

How to Tell a True War Story employs both major and minor characters to tell the story and push forward O’Brien’s agenda. One of the main characters is Lieutenant Jonny Cross, who serves in Alpha Company. He was never in support of the idea to go to war and lead men, but instead, he concentrates on his newfound love for a girl named Martha. Elroy is a man whom O’Brien considers as his life hero. After O’Brien’s attempt at going to Canada, Elroy is the one that takes him in. Martha is Jimmy Cross’ Lieutenant love interest. They have only been to one date back in college and she sends him love letters and pebbles, to which him good luck in the war. Norman Bowker and Dave Jensen are also other main characters. Norman returned with seven medals from the war but he is tortured with the guilt of Kiowa’s death. He feels responsible for his death (Gallagher, 56). Dave Jensen is a soldier that served in the same platoon as O’Brien. Tim O’Brien is also a character in the text. The collection is a collection of O’Brien’s experiences before, during, and after serving as a soldier in the Vietnam war. Other supporting characters include Ted Lavender, Azar, Henry Dobbins, Bob “Kat Rilley, Mitchell Sanders, Lee, Kathleen, Mark Fossie, Essie Diamond, Mary Anne, Billie, Max, among others. The author does a good job of depicting them as the perfect supporting cast for the story. They play a critical role in expounding the theme of truth.

Plot

The plot in Tim O’Brien’s How to Tell a True War Story is unlike any other. In the traditional sense it is not a story because it does not proceed in the usual chronological and straight path from the beginning to the end. Instead, it is a compilation of many shirt stories that interspeed with instructions has to do with true stories during the Vietnam War. The story starts begins with the words, “This is true” before narrating a story about his friend Rat who is writing a letter to the sister of his late friend. The letter can be described as long and heartfelt. Rat waits for reply for two months but unfortunately she never replies the letter. One cannot necessarily say that the story lacks flow because the events in the story relate to each other. Despite the stories being written in the form of a collection of the short story, they follow each other smoothly and there is no doubt that it is how the author intended them to be.

Works Cited

Gallagher, Molly J. “Opening a Trapdoor in Your Soul: Tim O’Brien’s Pursuit of a True War Story.” (2019).