Recent orders
Stoic epistemology
Name
Lecturer
Course
Date
Stoic epistemology
Knowledge is a philosophical concept which has been quite challenging to understand. Over the years, philosophers came up with diverging ideas about it. Precisely, it took a very long time for them to agree on the sources of knowledge. This sparked a very hot debate amongst the philosophers. Zeno emphasized on the role of “moral and intellectual perfection” in the acquisition of knowledge. According to his school of thought, reason can also be considered as a source of knowledge. To the stoicism, the acquisition of the right knowledge can be instrumental in identifying the truth and distinguishing it from a fallacy. However, this is not a simple thing to achieve because of the generalizations and misconceptions commonly encountered in the pursuit of knowledge.
The application of reason as a source of knowledge is quite fundamental. It can help an individual to be privy with the truth as a result of the use of wits and critical thought. Meaning, there should be the use of senses and the mind. Whereas the senses are instrumental in receiving sensations from the immediate surroundings, the mind is used to enhance responses. A proper coordination between the two is so critical. If any of them is impaired, it will be impossible for a person to get information about the objects around him before sieving it to unveil the truth. The constant flow of pulsations is used in the establishment of phantasia which is necessary for the acclimatization of a person to an object. These arguments are showing and reflecting clearly an element of inadequacy. There should be a clear understanding of the stoicism concepts for a person to be able make logical arguments.
As the stoics formulate, the mind should be a proper status to be able to perform its operations perfectly. Since it has an ability to judge, it can eventually enable a person to establish the truth. It is such a judgment that the mind uses to approve or reject an impression before eventually creating an impact to the person. The judgment creates an impression in the mind which grants a person an ample opportunity to differentiate the truth and falsehood. As Long and Sedley (2002, p112) examine, this demonstrates that ‘there should be a cordial relationship between these two organs because without them, nothing much can be achieved.’ Another important thing to know about this judgment is that the whole process does not necessarily occur in a similar manner. While other impressions take a very short time to be fully approved, others take considerably longer time duration. These are beliefs or opinion and they are manifested by different people in different ways to serve ego.
Surely, it is not an easy thing to achieve a full conviction and comprehension without the incorporation of reason. However, it is unfortunate that not all the people possess such a trait. It is only the sages who can be accredited to be having a full stoicism. Their full achievement implies that they can go beyond a mere belief since they have ability to verify the premises before making a conclusive judgment. Unlike them, many people have been unable to ascertain the truth. They do not have the skills to critically analyze a situation before making a productive and fruitful elevation of the mind. Thus, they cannot methodically examine situations and come up with the truth regarding the objects with which they are confronted. This explains why many people have been finding it difficult to make rational judgments for them to distinguish the truth in real life situation. This should be part of an argument.
Meanwhile, Stoics came up with the idea of “graspable” presentation.” This was also important in resolving the controversies which surrounded the inclusion of sense as a credible source of knowledge. As indicated earlier, knowledge had been a very contentious topic amongst the philosophers. However, despite their knowledge of such controversies, the stoics decided to take a low profile regarding the use of sense as a source of knowledge. Thus, they came up with this term to help people in distinguishing between the truth and false information. As a complex concept, a person is said to be able to do this in case they use such sense-perceptions to represent the actual truth in an accurate manner. it is a ‘graspable’ presentation that can use such perceptions to ascertain the truth.
To qualify for such a stature, it is essential for a person to be in a position of distinguishing the truth from falsehood or fantasy. It is a common thing for people to experience fantasies in their day to day experiences. However, these should not be confused with reality because they are quite distinct from each other. This was justified by (Aetius, 4.12.1) who said that “experiences in the soul which occurs as the result of no presented object, as in the case of people who fight with shadows and punch at thin air. For a presented object underlies the presentation, but no presented object the ‘phantastic.’ Besides, the presentation should be made to account for the object that is making it to be in existence. There should be a clear statement to focus on such objects since they help in tracing and understanding their source.
In his definition of this term, Zeno said it refers to a presentation originally coming from an existing object that was produced, molded and shaped just like it (the source object). This implies that each object has some form of uniqueness which are only associated with it. Hence, it requires a proper knowledge not to be altered at all times. I would like to be skeptical about this position because it is actually difficult for two different objects to be completely identical. Meaning, there may be a possibility of a false presentation resembling an original one. This is a very complex concept which needs to be approached more carefully. Many people have not been able to make such distinctions. It is advisable for them to be so keen on their judgments. This is the same problem identified in the given arguments. It proves a lack of adequate knowledge on presentations. There are elements of weak arguments which indicate inadequate mastery of knowledge.
Stoicism played a very significant role in resolving the controversy that surrounded the sources of knowledge. Despite its earlier disapproval by a section of scholars, sense-perception was recognized not only as a source, but as a reliable one. However, I would like to emphasize that this should not just be accepted like that. In my opinion, I would like to suggest that it should be accepted only if used under the right conditions. Some contexts may warrant it as a credible source of knowledge. This is mainly due to the fact that these sense-perceptions are not presented in a similar manner. in other words, some may present their objects sufficiently while others do not. This means that some of them are able to give true judgments while others giving false ones. In this case, not all of them can be relied upon even if Cicero regarded them as the messengers of truth.
Indeed, ‘graspable’ presentations are useful in helping people to understand facts. a proper understanding of an object is useful in distinguishing between the truth and falsehood. This in turn, is useful in making accurate, right and rational judgments. After all, stoics hold that self-perception is a significant thing because it is he starting point for the knowledge. All the forms of knowledge come from experience and/or self-perception. This justifies why even false expressions which are experienced by the mad or during sleep are dependent on it. What is false may not be easy to perceive. Thus, it is crucial to differentiate it from what is true.
In conclusion, I would like to acknowledge that knowledge is a very complex thing. Everyone should strive to seek it. As Zeno found out, it should begin from self-perception because it can be used as a foundation for knowing the truth and differentiating it from falsehoods. Everyone should be conscious of these facts to be able to make rational judgments to be in a position of resolving their day to challenges.
Works Cited
Long, A.A. and D. N. Sedley The Hellenistic Philosophers 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Print.
Critical Analysis Oedipal Complex in Hamlet
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
Critical Analysis: Oedipal Complex in Hamlet
Introduction
William Shakespeare’s literary works have continually enjoyed widespread public acceptance through time. He explicitly explores various themes that have different implications on the audience. He achieves this through the manipulation of different characters that play an important role of relaying vital information to the audience. Notably, his themes exhibit an acceptable degree of maturity in the literary circles. These have various implications and evoke different responses from the audience that are both positive and negative.
In his play Hamlet, Shakespeare presents to the public the sensitive theme of oedipal complex. This is well articulated in the essay through Gertrude, Claudius and Hamlet. Hamlet harbors sexual feelings for his mother and this prompts him to assume insanity in order to carry out his plan of revenge. Critical studies in this regard contend that his revenge is triggered by the hatred he feels for Claudius for having won his mother’s affection even after killing his father. It is against this background that this paper provides a critical analysis of the inherent theme of oedipal complex and underscores how it affects and influences the characters of Hamlet.
Essentially, the oedipal complex affirms that a male child often desires an intimate and sexual relationship with his mother. This is often triggered by feelings of rivalry and the need for utmost attention from his father. The principle is derived from the mythological stories of Oedipus, the prince who supposedly killed his father and later unknowingly married his mother. According to Freud, this is a normal behavioral attribute that is mainly experienced between the age three and five years and disappears with time once the child develops the superego that enables the same to deal with such desires accordingly. In Hamlet, Shakespeare explores this through evaluation of the behavior of Hamlet. The audience is made to believe that Hamlet harbors an unconscious sexual desire for his mother.
At the beginning of the essay, it is certain that the family structure of Hamlet is altered through the introduction of Claudius. This makes it difficult for Hamlet to make viable choices with regard to the person that he needs to refer to as his father. This is further compounded by the fact that Hamlet is also masculine and needs to further this position within the family context. He finds it tricky to deal with this disjointed identity and therefore decides to eliminate the second masculine figure that is presented by his uncle. In the previous years, Hamlet had idolized his father and regarded him differently, something he found difficult to do when his uncle enters his life.
From a psychoanalytical point of view, Hamlet is conceived to be overwhelmed with oedipal feelings. To begin with, his desire to murder his uncle is inclined in the need to take this position from his uncle. Hamlet according to this school of thought can go to any length to eliminate his uncle form the life of his father. The desire for vengeance stems from Hamlet’s frustration of having lost the ability to further his sexual feelings that he had for his mother (Jacques 13). In this respect, it is posited that Claudius prevented him from pursuing the feelings he had suppressed since his childhood. The urge to pursue this vengeance is also encouraged by his father’s ghost who informs him that the marriage of his mother is adulterous. Basically, this is true because Claudius was his paternal uncle and therefore marrying his mother was incestuous.
It is also argued that the oedipal feelings that are exhibited by Hamlet are contributed to by the character of his mother. In particular, her hasty marriage with Claudius, hardly a month after the death of her husband was insensitive to the feelings of her son. In this respect, it is speculated that when experiencing grief, a son always yearns for feelings of affections from his mother. These are natural feelings that can be effectively addressed through assurance. Thus by getting marred before Hamlet had fully grieved for the death of his father; it indicates that these feelings were not attended to. This makes Hamlet jealous and increases his desire for revenge to Claudius whom he believes is an obstacle between his mother and him.
As indicated earlier, Hamlet had idolized his father whom he held in high regard. When his mother remarries quickly after his father’s death and he believes that his uncle is responsible for this, he considers it his duty to carry out his revenge. This urge and the relative anger are further perpetuated by his father’s ghost that informs him that the marriage is actually adulterous.
Carrying out the revenge would possibly make his father, although absent, to be proud of him. In addition, it can be argued that carrying out this plan was an exemplification of the respect he had for his father. The fact that he idolized his father motivates him to carry out his plans and thus fulfills his emotional feelings. Fulfillment of wishes in this respect denotes the desire that is unconsciously motivated and that which seeks to enable an individual to achieve the kind of things that enhances personal pleasure. Satisfaction of this desire according to Freud’s thinking is fundamental for enhancing happiness of both the ego and the id.
Ophelia’s death also provides useful insights that point to the desire that Hamlet has for his mother. At this point, he ascertains that he is unable to love any other person but his mother. During Ophelia’s funeral, Hamlet is enraged because of the fact that the death of unexpected. This makes him to tell the king and queen that “Here, thou incestuous, murd’rous, damned Dane, drink off this portion” (Shakespeare xi). Notably, he mentions incest to these despite the fact that they did not involve in any. Critical studies ascertain that this could be a subconscious indication of the sexual feelings that he had for his mother but which he made efforts to suppress. However, this can be contested on the premise that Hamlet was actually influenced by rage and was exhibiting some level of insanity as he did not have full control over his feelings. However, critical studies in this regard argue that Hamlet’s madness was feigned and all along, he was aware of his actions and conversation (Strachey 238). In this consideration therefore, it is certain that he actually implied feelings of sexual desire for his mother.
Jacques also points out that in some instances, normal conversations can influence expression of one’s feelings unconsciously (23). This is manifested when Hamlet has lengthy conversation with his mother in which he sets certain regulations with regard to sexuality. These feelings are undoubtedly unusual as Hamlet presents his mother with certain rules that he deems would deliver her current adulterous marriage. He tells his mother “Oh throw away the worst part of it, and live the purer with the other half. Goodnight-but go not to my uncle’s bed” (Shakespeare xii). In this conversation, it is certain that Hamlet’s words are suggestive and imply that Gertrude should be in love with him and not with Claudius. Both he and his mother do not seem to understand the underlying meaning of these words.
Later when he holds another conversation with his mother, Hamlet confesses that her relationship with his uncle triggers feelings of jealousy in him. “Let the bloat king tempt you again to bed, inch wanton on your cheek, call you his mouse, for a pair of reechy kisses, or paddling your neck with his damned fingers” (Shakespeare xiii). These words are filled with a high degree of contempt and suggest that Hamlet disregards the sexual relations that she shares with his mother.
According to the theoretical construct, the desire in the oedipal dream is usually in a warped form although there are inherent echoes of the same in reality. At a personal level, Hamlet makes a self evaluation and suspects that he could be in love with his mother. He posits “That I essentially am not in madness, but mad in craft” (Shakespeare xii). This implies that he was pretending to be mad in order to pursue his plans. This had however made him obsessed with craftiness and gradually, he was assuming madness. Nonetheless, it can be argued that Hamlet could not be in position to understand his feelings and by stating that he was mad in craft, it indicates that he was confused and unsure of his behavior.
After killing Polonius, he makes a critical remark that portrays his feelings and perceptions of love. “From the fair forehead of an innocent love and sets a blister there, makes marriage vows as false as dicers’ oaths” (Shakespeare xii). This means that Hamlet does not believe that love is an imperative aspect of marriage. He asserts that marriage is not an indication of love rather true love is multifaceted and complex and its meaning goes beyond the institution of marriage. This can also be used to imply that Hamlet had differential feelings towards the marriage of his uncle and his mother. It is clear that he believes that his uncle did not love his mother as much as he did. By complexity, he ascertains that his unusual behavior and assumption of love is greatly contributed to by the feelings of affection that he has for his mother.
Conclusion
Shakespeare’s effective presentation of the vital themes in his text plays a critical in enhancing the attention of the audience as well as evoking relevant response from the same. The theme of Oedipus complex has raised various concerns since historical times. The relative arguments have increasingly been inclined in the Freudian theories as well as the teachings of psychoanalysis. From the preceding analysis, it is certain that Oedipus complex greatly influences the behavior that is exhibited by young Hamlet. He presents a notion of harboring sexual feelings for his mother. This is contributed to by his mother’s marriage to his uncle hardly a month after her husband died. This raised suspicion and Hamlet believed that he was responsible for the death of his father.
Because he idolized his father and held him in high regard, he deemed it impetrative to revenge by killing his uncle. This triggers him to undertake revenge as he believes that Claudius is responsible for the death of his father. This feeling is further perpetuated by the encouragement that he gets from his father’s ghost. As it has come out from the study, it is certain that Hamlet has sexual feelings for her mother. This is exemplified through the insane behavior that he assumes. Notably, the “normal” conversations that he holds with his mother imply that he is jealous of his uncle. He goes to the extent of making attempts to stop his mother from sleeping with his uncle. In addition, he posits that the marriage institution that the two share is not based on love and likens his feelings to the complexity that is used to define love.
Annotated Bibliography
“Family Romances.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 9. Trans. and Ed. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press, 1959. 237-241
The author provides an insightful analysis of Sigmund Freud’s approach to psychoanalysis. He explores the basic elements of Oedipus complex from a psychoanalytic point of view. Notably, this information provides a basement upon which vital deductions regarding to Hamlet’s play are made.
“Introduction.” Hamlet, By William Shakespeare: Screenplay, Introduction, and Film Diary. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1996. xi-xv.
This provides vital background information that informs the audience of the conflict in the play. This enables the audience to be well informed in advance about the anticipated conflict and therefore follow the same closely. This knowledge is important for effective analysis of the play.
Lacan, Jacques. “Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet (1977).” Literature and Psychoanalysis–The Question of Reading: Otherwise. Shoshana Felman, ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1993. 11-52
The author provides an in depth analysis of the inherent desire in Hamlet fro a psychoanalytic point of view. He contends that Hamlet’s sexual desire compels him to carry out the revenge. He ascertains that satisfaction of desire is a requisite for attainment of happiness. This information provided vita guidance for the study under review.
Proposal
Oedipal complex is one of the sensitive themes that Shakespeare manages to effectively explore in his Hamlet. Notably, this theme triggers various events and revolves around the main characters in the story. It can be considered one of the central themes that augment other themes such as revenge and insanity. Moreover it triggers the relative events and makes it possible for the author to enhance coherence in the play. Despite this elemental role, it is certain that this is deeply embedded and requires critical thinking in order to identify it within the text. As it will come out from the study, the sexual feelings that Ham let harbors for his mother are implicated for triggering him to pursue revenge against his uncle whom he believed denied him a chance to satisfy these feelings.
Nathan Pust
Name
Lecturer
Course
Date
Nathan Pust
Introduction
Nathan Pust is a ten-month old infant born on 1/2/2012. During his birth time, he was having a weight of 11 pounds 4 ounces with a height of 19 inches. This was a very good record indicating that he was in a right condition and would be assured of a healthy growth if provided with the entire medical and any other necessary attention. Because of this, he has now been taken to a kindergarten centre where he is expected to interact with fellow infants, caretakers, strangers and the new environment. However, his current observation found out that his body weight has increased to 21 pounds while his height increasing to 27 inches since he was born.
Reaction to People
During the observation carried out at the kindergarten, Nathan, just like any other infant, should a lot of mixed reactions to the people he was exposed to. First, he interacted well with other infants who were brought next to her. He felt attracted to them and could be seen communicating with them using smiles. The same reaction was observed between him and the caregivers. He did not show any form of fear whenever he was introduced to these people. I think this must have been so, because of the rapport they had established. They had become familiar to him.
However, Nathan did not feel attracted to the adults he was exposed to. He was so afraid of them and could attempt shy away from them if they attempted to move closer to him. This was worsened when he was brought closer to strangers whom he had never met before. Here, he was so frightened, avoided them and openly cried. This indicates that he has not fully developed and has narrowed his environment to the small number of people he frequently interacts with.
Exploration
Nathan was so adventurous. Despite spending a long time next to his caregivers, he kept on crawling from place to place. This includes places where he would see attractive objects and other infants whom he would interact with. According to this observation, he was fond of an object which looked so attractive for him. It is here where he would get nice toys and dolls to play with. This is why it not only remained attractive for her, but for many other children who are cared for in this institution.
Body Movements
Nathan had an ability to move from place to place. This could happen by moving his body parts and the whole body whenever he wanted to change position. For instance, he would move his face when looking for an object which was carried by one of caregivers. He would move his face to catch up with the movement of the object which seemed attractive for him.
At the same time, Nathan could move the whole of his body whenever he wanted to change position to another location so as to do whatever thing he felt would please him. He was crawling with his limbs as the most active parts of his body.
Affordance
Nathan is an active child. He showed a lot of affordance in the way he conducted himself. In other words, he looked a very light headed toddler who did not find it difficult to cope up with the prevailing conditions in the kindergarten. He could autonomously use his efforts to improve his walking abilities by moving his feet step by step. This proved that he had high cognitive skills and could suit his immediate environment.
Habituation
Nathan indicated habituation to certain objects which were more pleasing to her. When presented with attractive objects such as food, toys and conspicuous flowers, he would identify with them. As a result, he took quite a long time while still looking at them. However, this would even continue when such objects were taken away from him. Meaning, he had developed a schemata for such objects making it easy for him to identify them at all the times. This showed that he is a very active infant who can identify with his immediate environment.
Nathan did this selectively because he could not just look at everything in the same way. According to the observations made, he would only spend a long time starring at the attractive objects. However, anything which could not please him could not be treated in the same way. For instance, when she had been frightened by a stranger, he would dissociate himself with them. He would not even admire an object given to him by such scaring faces.
Hidden Objects
The way Nathan looked at the hidden objects indicated that he was progressively developing his cognitive skills. The habituation skills extended beyond just looking at objects for a considerably long time to looking at the hidden objects. He was doing this because he believed that the objects were still there.
This justifies the cognitive theory of human development which states that human mind and intelligence undergo a series of progressive stages. It determines the development of intelligence in that it enables people at certain chronological age to show certain cognitive behaviors. According to Nathan, his cognitive abilities could not convey to hi the information that the hidden object could not b seen unless placed behind a transparent object. This is abstract reasoning popular with infants of Nathan’s age.
Temperament
Nathan’s temperament was used as a very important tool in determining his interactions with his fellow toddlers, caregivers, strangers and the world at large. He showed a complex of traits including anger, emotion, hyper-activity and fear. Because of his excessive energy, he could uncontrollably move from place to place trying to touch and taste anything he came across. He could wander form the bed to the kitchen and to the play ground to use anything valuable to him.
At the same time, his emotions were extremely hot. He would cry profusely whenever offended by anybody or denied to do something which would be detrimental to him. When taken next to strange people, he would be so afraid. In fact, he mostly responded by crying. This means that he had a great fear against these people.
Language
Nathan must be a first learner. At this stage of growth, he was mastering language skills and could communicate by bubbling. Hence, he often found it easier to utter vowel sounds such as oooo, aaaa, iiii, eeee and uuuu. More surprisingly, he went ahead to pronounce single common words such as mama. This must be the most common word he was using at home when interacting with his parents.
Unfortunately, it was extremely difficult to communicate to him. In most case, when shouted at, he would burst into wailing. However, he could read lips and interpret certain gestures especially when being given food and anything interesting to him.
