Recent orders
Risk Management and Human Resource Management Plans
Risk Management and Human Resource Management Plans Resource Management in Project Management
Risk Management and Human Resource
Management Plans Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The process of project management has five phases: (1) design and initiation, which you just completed; (2) finalizing your plan before implementation, which you will do now; (3) implementation; (4) monitor and control; and finally, (5) evaluation and lessons learned (as well as knowledge transfer).
During Phase 2 (finalizing the project plan), you will continue to create the tools and documents you will need when you implement your project as the project manager in Phase 3.
Week 4: Communications Plan
Week 5: Deliverables and Critical Success Factors (CSFs)
Week 6: Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Gantt Chart
Week 7: Risk Management and Human Resource Management Plans
In this assignment, students document, track, and manage a project’s risks and use of human resources. The risk management will be accomplished by using a risk register chart.
Using the risk register is a way to identify, document, and manage all the risks associated with a project. The chart details provide an easy way to scan for level of risk, status, potential responses, who is responsible for the risk in addition to the project manager, or other details needed to manage the risk. This is a great way to keep everyone informed when this document is presented at the weekly team meetings and in communication with all stakeholders.
Another key tool is called the RACI chart, which helps you identify who is responsible, accountable, consulted, or informed for each major project task. The RACI chart will help manage and track use of human resources; this facilitates monitoring and control and provides one means of communication. It documents and makes clear who is responsible for bringing the task to completion, on time and on budget.
Due Date: Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points Possible: 50
Requirements
- Complete the Risk Register and RACI documents for your project. Attach as appendices to a professional, scholarly paper.
- Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition.
Preparing the paper
- All project risks must be identified and added to your risk register following the example. Attach them as appendices to a professional, scholarly paper.
- The RACI chart must provide the responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of the team for all major project tasks following the RACI example. Attach as appendices to a professional, scholarly paper.
- Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly using the current edition of the APA manual.
- Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing.
Assignment Criteria
| Category | Points | % | Description |
| All the project risks are identified, and the details are entered into the risk register appropriately, following the example format. Documents are attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | 20 | 40 | All the project risks are identified, and the details are entered into the risk register appropriately, following the example format. Documents are attached as an appendix to a professional paper. |
| The RACI chart shows all major project tasks with the responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of the team, following the example provided. Documents are attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | 20 | 40 | The RACI chart shows all major project tasks with the responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of the team, following the example provided. Documents are attached as an appendix to a professional paper. |
| Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition of the manual. Professional paper follows guidelines found in Writing a Professional Paper. | 10 | 20 | Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition of the manual. Professional paper follows guidelines found in Writing a Professional Paper. |
| Total | 50 | 100 | A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric
| Assignment Criteria | Exceptional
(100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
(88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets
(80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
(38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
(0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
||
| Content
Possible Points = 40 |
|
|
|
||||
| All the project risks are identified, and the details are entered into the risk register appropriately, following the example format. Documents are attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points | ||
| All project risks identified and details entered into risk register appropriately, following example format. Documents attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | Most project risks identified and details entered into the risk register appropriately, following example format. Documents attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | Only some project risks identified or details not entered into risk register appropriately, or entries do not follow example format. No professional paper included. | Few project risks identified or details are not entered into risk register appropriately | Entries do not follow example format | |||
| The RACI chart shows all major project tasks with the responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of the team, following the example provided. Documents are attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points | ||
| RACI chart shows all major project tasks with responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of team, following example provided. Documents attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | RACI chart shows most major project tasks with responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of the team, following example provided. Documents attached as an appendix to a professional paper. | RACI chart shows some major project tasks without responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member team, or entries do not follow example provided. Professional paper not included. | RACI chart shows few of the major project tasks without responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of team | Entries do not follow example provided | |||
| Content Subtotal | _____ of 40 Points | ||||||
| Format
Possible Points = 10 |
|||||||
| Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition of the manual. Professional paper follows guidelines found in Writing a Professional Paper. | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | ||
| No grammar, spelling, punctuation, reference, citation, or APA errors. Professional paper follows guidelines found in Writing a Professional Paper. | One grammar, spelling, punctuation, reference, citation, or APA error. Professional paper follows guidelines found in Writing a Professional Paper. | Two grammar, spelling, punctuation, reference, citation, or APA errors Professional paper does not follows guidelines found in Writing a Professional Paper. | Three grammar, spelling, punctuation, reference, citation, or APA errors. No professional paper. | Four or more grammar, spelling, punctuation, reference, citation, or APA errors | |||
| Format Subtotal | _____ of 10 Points | ||||||
| Total Points | _____ of 50 | ||||||
Health policy pertaining to a health risk or disparity
Health policy pertaining to a health risk or disparity
Module 7 Assignment:
Health Policy Analysis
Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to assess one current health policy pertaining to a health risk or disparity. Alignment of the health policy with national population health initiatives will be appraised. Students will develop one recommendation to reduce health risk or disparity and to promote health outcomes. Finally, opportunities to enhance population health through interprofessional collaborative practice will be examined.
Course Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes.
- CO 2: Examine health initiatives and regulations used to promote population and global health. (PO 5)
- CO 4: Describe nursing’s role in promoting the health of local and global populations. (POs 3, 4)
- CO 5: Explore legal and ethical considerations in population health practice. (PO 4)
Suggested Due Date
This assignment has a due date of Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Module 7.
Total Points Possible: 200 Points
Assignment Overview
Select one health policy that addresses a population health risk or disparity. Policies to consider may be at the unit, organizational, community, local, or state level.
Determine the purpose and intended impact of the policy. Assess the congruence of the policy with current national population health goals and objectives (such as the Healthy People initiative, or another national initiative). Based upon your analysis, consider recommendations to further address the health risk or disparity, as well as interprofessional opportunities to enhance health outcomes.
In a 10-14 slide PowerPoint presentation, address the elements listed below. Include a minimum of four scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the presentation.
- Provide an introduction to the presentation.
- Describe one health policy that relates to an identified health risk or disparity. Summarize the intended impact of the policy on the risk or disparity and discuss ethical implications regarding the policy.
- Examine the policy within the context of a national population health initiative and determine the degree to which the policy is congruent with that national population health goal and/or objective. Explain your findings.
- Propose one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity and discuss opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to your recommendation.
- Provide a conclusion to the presentation.
Assignment Instructions
- Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
- Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create the presentation.
- Each slide (excluding title and reference slides) must include detailed speaker notes.
- The purpose of the speaker notes is to expand upon the idea and document facts and information about the bulleted information points on the slide.
- Formal, scholarly writing style with complete sentence and paragraph structure should be used to create the speaker notes.
- Scholarly literature support should be integrated within the speaker notes.
- Speaker notes assure that all assignment expectations and key points are covered.
- Within the speaker notes, the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
- First person should not be used for this scholarly assignment.
- Citation and referencing of sources must be congruent with guidelines noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
- Slides are professional in appearance with visually balanced text, font is appropriate for audience reading, bulleted points are succinct, and there is visually appealing contrast between the background and font utilized. Correct spelling and appropriate use of graphics/images are evident.
- Sources older than 5 years may not be used without the permission of the class instructor.
- Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can resubmit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper; rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59 p.m. (You cannot revise your graduate-level writing style for a higher grade in that category.).
Assignment Criteria
| Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Introduction | 20 | 10% | This section includes the following.
· General statements regarding the role of health policy to influence population health · Discussion regarding the importance of health policy to address the identified health risk or disparity · Identification of the sections of the presentation · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
| Health Policy Analysis | 40 | 20% | This section includes the following.
· Identification and description of a health policy · Description of the intended impact of the policy on health risk or disparity · Discussion of ethical implications regarding the policy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
| Alignment with National Population Health Initiative | 30 | 15% | This section includes the following.
· Congruence of the policy with a national population health initiative (such as Healthy People or another initiative) · Explain your appraisal regarding the level of congruence that is noted · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
| Recommendation for Enhancement | 50 | 25% | This section includes the following.
· Recommendation of one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity · Explanation of how the strategy would be implemented · Discussion regarding opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to the recommended strategy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
| Conclusion | 20 | 10% | This section includes the following.
· Concluding statements regarding the impact of health policy on population health · Succinct summary of policy analysis and recommendation proposed · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
|
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 20 | 10%
|
Graduate-level writing style is included, evidenced by integrating the following standards.
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes · Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides · Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes · APA format (most current edition) for citing and referencing sources · Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) · No direct quotes are used within the assignment · First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes
|
| Graduate-level Presentation Style | 20 | 10% | Professional presentation is created, evidenced by the following.
· Slide design includes visually balanced text · Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used · Succinct, key points are presented on the slides · No lengthy narratives are included on the slides · Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger) · Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic
|
| Quality of Literature Support | It is an expectation that a minimum of four scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment.
If the above expectation is not met, 4 points shall be deducted.
|
||
| Assignment Length Criteria | It is an expectation that the assignment is a minimum of 10 slides and a maximum of 14 slides in length (not including the title or reference slides).
If the above expectation is not met, 4 points shall be deducted.
|
||
| Total | 200 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric
| Assessment Criteria | Distinguished
(100%)
|
Exceeds
(92%)
|
Proficient
(84%)
|
Needs Improvement
(0%)
|
|
| Introduction | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· General statements regarding the role of health policy to influence population health · Discussion regarding the importance of health policy to address the identified health risk or disparity · Identification of the sections of the presentation · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· General statements regarding the role of health policy to influence population health · Discussion regarding the importance of health policy to address the identified health risk or disparity · Identification of the sections of the presentation · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· General statements regarding the role of health policy to influence population health · Discussion regarding the importance of health policy to address the identified health risk or disparity · Identification of the sections of the presentation · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· General statements regarding the role of health policy to influence population health · Discussion regarding the importance of health policy to address the identified health risk or disparity · Identification of the sections of the presentation · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
||
| Health Policy Analysis | 40 Points | 36 Points | 33 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Identification and description of a health policy · Description of the intended impact of the policy on health risk or disparity · Discussion of ethical implications regarding the policy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Identification and description of a health policy · Description of the intended impact of the policy on health risk or disparity · Discussion of ethical implications regarding the policy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Identification and description of a health policy · Description of the intended impact of the policy on health risk or disparity · Discussion of ethical implications regarding the policy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Identification and description of a health policy · Description of the intended impact of the policy on health risk or disparity · Discussion of ethical implications regarding the policy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
||
| Alignment with National Population Health Initiative | 30 Points | 27 Points | 25 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Congruence of the policy with a national population health initiative (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) · Explain your appraisal regarding the level of congruence that is noted · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Congruence of the policy with a national population health initiative (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) · Explain your appraisal regarding the level of congruence that is noted · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Congruence of the policy with a national population health initiative (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) · Explain your appraisal regarding the level of congruence that is noted · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Congruence of the policy with a national population health initiative (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) · Explain your appraisal regarding the level of congruence that is noted · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
||
| Recommendation for Enhancement | 50 Points | 46 Points | 42 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Recommendation of one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity · Explanation of how the strategy would be implemented · Discussion regarding opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to the recommended strategy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Recommendation of one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity · Explanation of how the strategy would be implemented · Discussion regarding opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to the recommended strategy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Recommendation of one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity · Explanation of how the strategy would be implemented · Discussion regarding opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to the recommended strategy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Recommendation of one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity · Explanation of how the strategy would be implemented · Discussion regarding opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to the recommended strategy · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
||
| Conclusion | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Concluding statements regarding the impact of health policy on population health · Succinct summary of policy analysis and recommendation proposed · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Concluding statements regarding the impact of health policy on population health · Succinct summary of policy analysis and recommendation proposed · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Concluding statements regarding the impact of health policy on population health · Succinct summary of policy analysis and recommendation proposed · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Concluding statements regarding the impact of health policy on population health · Succinct summary of policy analysis and recommendation proposed · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
|
||
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes · Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides · Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes · APA format (most current edition) for citing and referencing sources · Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) · No direct quotes are used within the assignment · First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes
|
Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-3 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes · Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides · Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes · APA format (most current edition) for citing and referencing sources · Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) · No direct quotes are used within the assignment · First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes
|
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 4-5 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes · Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides · Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes · APA format (most current edition) for citing and referencing sources · Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) · No direct quotes are used within the assignment · First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes
|
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 6 or more errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes · Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides · Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes · APA format (most current edition) for citing and referencing sources · Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) · No direct quotes are used within the assignment · First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes
|
||
| Graduate-level Presentation Style | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points | |
| Distinguished graduate-level presentation style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total:
· Slide design includes visually balanced text · Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used · Succinct, key points are presented on the slides · No lengthy narratives are included on the slides · Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger) · Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic
|
Graduate-level presentation style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-3 errors total:
· Slide design includes visually balanced text · Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used · Succinct, key points are presented on the slides · No lengthy narratives are included on the slides · Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger) · Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic
|
Proficient graduate-level presentation style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 4 errors total:
· Slide design includes visually balanced text · Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used · Succinct, key points are presented on the slides · No lengthy narratives are included on the slides · Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger) · Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic
|
Graduate-level presentation style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5 or more errors total:
· Slide design includes visually balanced text · Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used · Succinct, key points are presented on the slides · No lengthy narratives are included on the slides · Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger) · Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic
|
||
| Quality of Literature Support | 0 Points Deducted | 4 Points Deducted | |||
| A minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment. | The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support. | ||||
| Assignment Length Expectations | 0 Points Deducted | 4 Points Deducted | |||
| The length of the assignment meets the criteria:
Minimum of 10 slides in length; maximum of 14 slides in length (not including title or reference slides). |
The assignment fails to meet the requirement for length. | ||||
Managing Entrepreneurially
Managing Entrepreneurially
This assignment will be focused on demonstrating a clear and thorough understanding of the different factors that impact a business in relation to entrepreneurship as discussed in the module. Use a range of literature and sources from industry and academic sources to write clearly, analytically, and critically. You MUST use APA 7th edition referencing. You MUST also include your pre-module task in an appendix to the report (this can be copied and pasted or a screenshot of the post on ELE).
Assessment Brief:
Write a critical and analytical report on a REAL case study business covering the following points:
Entrepreneurial Analysis – How entrepreneurial is the business currently in relation to the key concepts covered during the module?
Predictions – In relation to the key concepts covered during the module, how do you think the business might perform in the future if it continues operating as it is currently?
Proposals – How could the business be more entrepreneurial (as related to the concepts and points covered in the module)?
Proposal Validation – In relation to the key concepts covered during the module, how do you think the business might perform in the future if it adopts the measures you suggested in your proposals?
You may select any real business provided there is at least some public information available about the company. You may choose businesses, charities, social enterprises and other organisations but you may not choose an individual or set of founders, this module is more about organisations rather than individual entrepreneurs.
The key areas of focus for this report include all the below areas covered in the module. The report should cover some but not all of these subject areas.
Leadership
HR, Teams and Diversity
Risk and Opportunity
Creativity and Innovation
Finance
Operations
Marketing
Strategy