Recent orders
Health Care Administrator Case Study Project
Health Care Administrator Case Study Project
Strategic management planning is vital in any organization. Baker, Baker, & Dworkin, (2018)
discuss six major components used in the creation of a strategic plan. Throughout the course we
have focused on financial matters of the health care administrator. Upon completion of M6A2
Health Care Administrator Case Study Project Part 1 of the project, the board of directors liked
what they saw and have tasked you with the creation of a revised strategic plan for the hospital
for their approval. You will use the budget you created using McKee & Mckee (2017) Case Study
13.3: North Side Hospital for your financial information and plan.
Review the Case Study 13.3: North Side HospitalPreview the document
Review the Excel workbook tab “M6A2” – completed Cash Budget Form.
Write a strategic plan for North Side Hospital using all components:
Mission Statement
Vision Statement
Organizational Values (for example, teamwork, compassion, community, etc.)
Goals – create a minimum of 3 goals
Objectives – create a minimum of 2 objectives per goal. Include at least one situational analysis
(SWOT) for the objective you believe is your most important objective for the hospital to focus
on.
Performance plans for the objectives– create a minimum of 2 action plans for each objective and
include the tools you will measure performance for accountability and timeliness of the initiatives.
Include benchmarks for your goals (bullet points are recommended).
Integrate in your plan at least one goal to be used for financial planning projections using the
budget sheet. Remember, you must be realistic and work within your cash flow (for example, you
may need to collaborate with another organization in the community to share costs, if needed).
Based on what you learned in this assignment, what, in your opinion, would be the main focus for
North Side Hospital in a five-year strategic plan?
Paper Guidelines:
Your paper should be a total of 3,1/2 – 5 pages long. Use of headings in your paper is required.
You must apply your readings, including the textbook and a minimum of 2 other readings
assigned in your syllabus. Please put your name on the first page of your paper, and in the file
name. You will cite all references using APA 6 Style. Please refer to the Excelsior OWL
“Research Corridor” Resources. Click “Documenting” for the “APA Style” and the “APA Citations”
links.
Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective Theory in Abnormal Behavior
Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective Theory in Abnormal Behavior
In your paper, you should cover the following: a psychological point of view and use it to describe
the cause of abnormal behavior ( your topic is Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective)
1-Describe your theory in detail and how the theory views behavior in general.
2-Explain how your theory describes the cause of your selected abnormal behavior.
3-Compare and contrast the point of view you chose with the sociocultural viewpoint.
3 (a) -How might they view the abnormal behavior similarly?
3 (b) -How might they view abnormal behavior differently?
4- Describe the benefits or drawbacks of applying multiple theories to defining abnormal behavior.
For this assignment, you are expected to meet the following requirements:
Title page: Include your name, course, date, and instructor.
Reference: Text book and two peer-reviewed journal articles. Additional references may be used.
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall
message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (sixth edition) style and
formatting.
Length of paper: 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Textbook:
Hooley, J. M., Butcher, J. N., & Nock, M. K. (2017). Abnormal psychology (18th ed.). Boston, MA:
Pearson Education Limited.
Effects of Misinformation
Effects of Misinformation
For this assignment, write a 3–to 5-page literature review on misinformation effects that
incorporate at least seven scholarly sources. The literature review will be on the role of familiarity
in misinformation. For the rest of the assignments in this course, you will then choose ONE of the
following: False Balance, Myth Busting or Retraction. Address the following within your literature
review. Ensure that each main point of your paper is supported clearly with evidence from your
sources. Under some points, there are guiding questions to guide your thinking, but be sure to
consult the scoring guide to make sure you are covering all of what will be assessed. In your
paper include:
1- Explain the psychological concepts that were addressed in the research.
2- Are there any patterns, themes, or trends that you were able to trace in your research?
3- Describe the concepts related to the theory that will be the basis for your research.
4-Discuss the value and limitations of the theoretical concepts.
5- Develop a plausible hypothesis that relies on evidence and reasoning.
Use APA-style formatting, citations, and references.
You do not need an index or abstract for this paper.
Length: 3-5 page typed, double-spaced pages.
Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Resources and citations: A minimum of 7 scholarly sources is required. Format according to
current APA guidelines.
Font and font-size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
Topic 1: Retraction
Review the materials on Retraction. Then, read the following article:
Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Reminders and repetition of
misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and
Cognition, 6(2), 185–192.
Topic 2: Myth Busting
Review the material for Myth Busting. Then, read the following article:
Pluviano, S., Watt, C., & Sergio, D. S. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three
pro-vaccination strategies. PLoS One, 12(7), 1–12.
Topic 3: False Balance
Review the material for False Balance. Then, read the following article:
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through
inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One,
12(5), 1–17.
Possible articles of familiarity and misinformation.
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation.
British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262.
Chan, M. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A MetaAnalysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation. Psychological
Science, 28(11), 1531–1546.
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through
inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One,
12(5), 1–17.
Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and
Cognition, 6(2), 185–192.
Pluviano, S., Watt, C., & Sergio, D. S. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three
pro-vaccination strategies. PLoS One, 12(7), 1–12.
Rapp, D. N., & Salovich, N. A. (2018). Can’t we just disregard fake news? The consequences of
exposure to inaccurate information. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2),
232–239.
By successfully completing this assignment the Competencies Measured are you will
demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies:
Competency 1: Explain types of psychological research methods.
Explain the purpose of psychological concepts that are addressed in research.
Competency 3: Design an ethically appropriate psychological research study utilizing
psychological theory and concepts.
Predict human behavior using a theory or psychological concept.
Describe the value and limitations of a theory or psychological concept to explain psychological
phenomena.
Competency 4: Conduct an ethically appropriate psychological research study.
Develop a plausible hypothesis that relies on scientific evidence and reasoning.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with
expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
Write an organized literature review that supports a thesis with main points that are supported by
evidence.