Recent orders
United States as a land of immigrants
Title
Name
University
Course
Instructor
Date
Introduction
United States is a land of immigrants and the recent census statistics have indicated that about 99% of the United States population can trace their origin to various nations across the sea, which includes European nations, African and Asian counties. The main reason behind various nationalities in the United States is attributable to heavy immigration through four American history centuries that have played a major role in stimulating United States’ dramatic population increased from a minor backwater across the distant British Empire fringe to the wealthiest economy in the globe and the top most populous nation with different nationalities. The discussion will analyze nationalities in the United States and discuss their economic impacts to the United States. It will also outline the benefits and limitations of multinational society, laws that were established in the US because of diverse nationalities, and the established challenges of multinational society as well as ways of coping with multinational society challenges.
Discussion
Nationalities in the United States and their economic impacts to the nation have be a point of discussion by various economists. Literature reviews that the US has experience dramatic immigration waves during the colonial era, in the 19th century and between 1880 and 1920s. Most of the US immigrants came to the nations looking for increased economic opportunities and others came seeking religious liberty – Muslim pilgrims of the 1600s. Similarly, started the 17th and 19th centuries, various slaves from African arrived in US against their wishes, (Bankston, Carl and Danielle 12). The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the earliest fundamental legislations by the US government to stop migration to the United States. Individual states also put some laws to restrict migration before the Ellis Island launch in the 1892 and in 1995, new immigration laws halted quota system that allowed European immigration, and currently, most of the US immigrants are Latin Americans and Asians.
Most of the United States population has European origin, with the largest population having the main origin traceable to nations like UK, Ireland, and Germany. Various Americans report duo or multiple nationalities with primary racial and national minority groups such as black Americans – with United States, African or Caribbean origin, china, Filipinas, Japanese, and Mexican nationals, and some from Americans with Spanish origin (Dvorak 14). The 2000 census suggested that United States population comprised of about 75.2% were whites, 12.6% Hispanics, 12.4 blacks 3.6% Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, 0.8% American Indians or Natives (Rothenberg 25).
Large immigrants groups from Europe came to the United States to search for economic opportunities; therefore, they had economic benefits and limitations to the US. For instance, because of steep price of passage, the largest group of the white Europeans to the US became indentured servants to the US companies and industries. Even though, some immigrants willingly indentured themselves, some were enslaved and trafficked from cities in Europe and held as slaves in the US (Friedman 69). In addition, various English convicts were transported across the Atlantic Ocean as slaves.
Immigrants from different countries are mainly hard workers who brought diverse talents, competences, expertise and skills to US companies and markets. They were principled people who promote the reputation of the US and were beneficial to the nation. Cultural diversity added value to the US companies, governments, and cultures (Massey, Jorge and Nolan 58). Multiculturalism makes the country rich in that they participate and offer their skills, expertise, and knowledge in international business. Similarly, US efficiently utilized ethnocultural aspects in the society to obtain a share of developing markets. This is because availability of diverse ethnic people is a critical mechanism for America.
Immigrants can create tension to Native Americans as they take natives jobs since they have specialized skills expertise and can provide cheap labor. Consequently, United States experience economic hardships because of increased unemployment as most of unskilled labors and American natives remain jobless (Gragnon and James 41). Joblessness causes tension between natives and immigrants especially because immigrants have employments opportunities – though lowly paid – and natives remain jobless. This causes hatred and racial segregation in the country.
Immigrants from different national origins bring skilled labor, expertise, and new technologies to Americans industries and companies, which is a plus to the economy. For instance, 2000 census evidence indicated that most finance and banking sector of the United States, as well as the agricultural sector benefited from employment of about 75% immigrants.
Additionally, immigrants have also stifled down the economy of America because 50% of them are known to send much of their money to their relatives and families in their nations of origin. Economically, this is a challenge to the US because the economy is gains very little from the immigrants.
Different nationalities in the United States created what experts refer to as multinational society (Johnstad 45). Multicultural society is the acceptance of diverse ethnic groups and cultural at the national level. This occurs in a nation where different people with diverse nationalities come together, form one society, and are accorded similar status. In the colonial era United States experienced a massive migration of people from different regions of the world mostly Europe, which is a key feature of the United State society. This massive immigration of people from different nationalities has resulted to multiculturalism in the US.
Experts agree that multinational societies experience various benefits and challenges. For instance, living together in a multinational society that has people with diverse nationalities and perspectives, make citizens interact together; share their cultures, experiences, skills, and expertise. People in a multinational society have to develop a common language that will enable them to communicate and share ideas, perspectives, and talents because each citizen has to learn from one another- promoting development in an intellectual manner (Marckey 63). A multinational society promotes an increasingly open-minded community and people start seeing situations from their neighbor’s perspective.
Shared communication and language has a economic and social importance because it enable people to respect , tolerate, and accept each their cultural differences and coexist in harmonious way (Simcox 23). People feel comfortable interacting and working together to increase productivity. Multinational society promotes togetherness in work and life and makes people less racists creating a non-discriminative society and a peaceful society.
Multinational society also face various challenges, for instance, people in multinational society – American natives or nationals – thing of immigrants as a threat to their culture, traditions and society because they can ruin the definition of the culture. Similarly, immigrants consider multinational society as a pool to ruin them of their morals, identity and culture because they have to adopt foreign cultures, language, and tradition to be able to fit in the society.
Multinational society at times promotes inequalities in social-economic opportunities for minor ethnic groups and this is a major problem in the US (Sen and Fekkak 42). Experts agree that multinational society concept has a major role to play in the US economics of gender and race. Experts define economics of gender and race as the theory of economics – this is how different nationals make choices and how such choices affect the US economy and the productivity of the person. Economics of gender and race looks into how practicality that diverse people have varied opportunities to make decisions, varied capacities to make choice and varied results from such decisions when their ethnicity and gender is considered.
For instance, racial segregation in the United States because of immigration laws has created a different between American natives and immigrants. This has affected their participation and motivation in economic activities (Carrare 42). Oppressed races and gender such as black’s women ware not give equal rights and recognition in job placement, hiring process and education systems. Additionally, in trade, business, and public fields, inequality was evident as blacks were given hardship jobs and low paying jobs.
However, this is not the case in the modern US population because of various modern immigration laws and regulations. For instance, modern immigration policy promotes equal rights for all people irrespective of their nationality, (Axelrad and Robert 52). The oppressed groups are now free to choose their job opportunities and racism has reduced because US is now an egalitarian society and the immigration and Nationality Act eliminates any case of racism and discrimination of immigrants.
Conclusion
In conclusion, therefore, United States is a multinational society and has a lot to celebrate in the heritage of immigration. Irrespective of the various disadvantages associated with the multinational society, United States has enjoyed economic prosperity because of various talents and skills that immigrants inject of the US economy.
Works cited
Axelrad, Lee, and Robert A. Kagan. Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. Internet resource.
Bankston, Carl L, and Danielle A. Hidalgo. Immigration in U.s. History. Pasadena, Calif: Salem Press, 2006. Internet resource.
Carrera, Sergio. In Search of the Perfect Citizen?: The Intersection between Integration, Immigration, and Nationality in the Eu. Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 2009. Internet resource.
Dvorak, William. Immigration in the United States. New York: H.W. Wilson Co, 2009. Print.
Gagnon, Alain, and James Tully. Multinational Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Print.
Fernandez, Ronald. America’s Banquet of Cultures: Harnessing Ethnicity, Race, and Immigration in the Twenty-First Century. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 2000. Print.
Friedman, Lawrence M. American Law in the 20th Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.Print.
Johnstad, Trygve. Group Dynamics and Society: A Multinational Approach. Cambridge, Mass: Published for the European Institute for Trans-National Studies in Group and Organizational Development [by] Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 2000. Print.
Mackey, William F. Multinational Society. , 2005. Print.
Massey, Douglas S, Jorge Durand, and Nolan J. Malone. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002. Print.
Mackey, William F, and Albert Verdoodt. The Multinational Society: Papers of the Ljubljana Seminar. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House, Publishers, 1975. Print.
Rothenberg, Paula S. Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: An Integrated Study. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2008. Print.
Sen, Rinku, and Fekkak Mamdouh. The Accidental American: Immigration and Citizenship in the Age of Globalization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2008. Internet resource.
Simcox, David E. U.s. Immigration in the 1980s: Reappraisal and Reform. Boulder: Westview Press, 1988. Print.
United Self Defense Forces of Columbia (AUC) Terrorist Group
Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
United Self Defense Forces of Columbia (AUC) Terrorist Group
The AUC also widely known as paramilitaries is an organization that was formed in 1997 as an umbrella organization to consolidate other regional and local self-defense groups. As explored by Garcia in the Terrorism Project the founders and leaders were Carlos and Fidel Castaño. After the death of Fidel Castaño the leadership of AUC was converted to a nine-member consortium while Carlos Castaño dedicated himself to the political part of the organization. According to Combs and Slann the aim of the AUC is to combat insurgents locally as well as provision of economic protection (347). The AUC gets its support from drug traffickers, economic elites and those from the local community claiming not to have enough security from the government. The organization’s main objective is to offer security to the sponsors from the insurgents.
Since the 1960s, the Government of Columbia was faced with the problem of combating self-defense groups that employed guerrilla warfare tactics. In time, these groups gained control of many local regions and the government conceded defeat leaving some of the local areas under the control of these defense groups and armed citizens (Combs and Slann 347). In the rural areas, the guerrilla tactics employed by these defence groups is more intense than the one employed by the government military taking up the role of paramilitaries and in most cases they are involved in activities that are not in accordance to the law. These groups include the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN). The government joined forces with The AUC in order to wipe out members of these self-defense groups that were involved in guerrilla warfare tactics.
The AUC has terrorised suspected civilians through assassinations, massacres, intimidations and kidnapping (Combs and Slann 347). Through support of this group, most government officials have been accused of supporting terrorist activities. This is a group that is well known for its violent killing methods therefore being accused of violating human rights in Columbia. The group derives its strength from the large number of members. Today, the group boasts of more than 10,000 members both in paramilitary and unarmed members mainly due to its involvement in drug trafficking.
According to Etats-Unis and the Department of State the AUC paramilitary force operates mainly from the Northwest Columbia where it was first formed (66). The regions where the group has its dominant operations are Antioquia, Sucre, Atlantico, Cesar, Bolivar Departments in association with other affiliate groups at the coffee region, Meta Department, Valle del Cauca. The AUC has not directly targeted the United States and its allies though it is involved in activities like drug trafficking that affect the United States directly. Unlike other terrorist groups that are being driven by Islamic views to fight the United States and its allies, the AUC is not religiously motivated. Their greatest motivation is the protection of the economic elites in Columbia against other self-defense groups. Members are from the country of Columbia and Spanish is the main language of communication.
The United States government as explored by Etats-Unis and the Department of State is very keen about fighting acts of terrorism after September 11 2001 and AUC poses a major challenge to the United States military due to their terrorist activities that involve merciless killings (65). The paramilitary forces are growing by the numbers each year with affiliation with the government of Columbia making it for the United States military to eliminate them. The United States government is currently teaming up with other organizations like the United Nations in the view of eliminating the AUC terrorist group.
In conclusion, the AUC was founded in 1997 with the view of helping the government fight other self-defense groups that employed guerrilla tactics as well as provide protection for the economic elites. The group gets its support from drug traffickers, economic elites and those from the local community claiming not to have enough security from the government. The AUC has terrorised suspected civilians through assassinations, massacres, intimidations and kidnapping. The group does not directly target the United States and its allies though their activities like drug trafficking are bound to affect the United States directly. Due to the group’s strong affiliation with the government of Columbia, it has been difficult for the United States military to eliminate the group.
Works Cited
Combs, Cindy and Slann, Martin. Encyclopaedia of Terrorism. New York: InfoBase Publishing, 2007.
Etats-Unis and Department of State. Patterns of Global Terrorism. USA: Government Printing Office, 2002.
Garcia, Victoria. Terrorism Project. CDI. September 23, 2002. Retrieved from HYPERLINK “http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/auc.cfm” http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/auc.cfm
United Photonics Malaysia SDN BHD
United Photonics Malaysia SDN BHD
Introduction
The Laz-Skan project is undoubtedly an enormous project for United Photonics Malaysia Sdn Bhd. It represents a groundbreaking invention that is likely to have considerable effects on the operations of the company, as well as its sustainability in the long-term and competitiveness in the world market. Needless to say, it is imperative that appropriate decisions are made pertaining to the operationalization of the project.
While there are varied individuals who may be qualified to lead in the implementation of the project, the Malaysian engineer named T.S Lim should be the leader in the implementation process. This is especially considering his stature in the company, his qualifications and the fact that he took charge in a comprehensive research that was aimed at determining the viability of the entire project. In essence, he knows the areas in which there may be loopholes, as well as the fragile aspects that demand more attention.
One of the key dangers in the implementation of the project is the conflict of leadership. The company already has some established structures, in which case any leader who takes charge of the project is bound to face resistance. On the same note, there is the likely cost of process acceleration, not only in financial terms but also the quality of items that would be produced in these processes (Müller & Turner, 2010). As Lim noted, the completion time could also not be predicted as the software development team did not have sufficient experience in the tasks.
Nevertheless, these dangers can be combated right from the beginning by putting in place measures that would prevent their disruption. The leadership problem would be combated through creating clear frameworks pertaining to the duties and responsibilities of individuals (Müller & Turner, 2010). On the same note, time should be set aside for testing the quality of items produced, as well as in anticipation of any deadline extension requirements (Müller & Turner, 2010). This would enable usability of the products, as well as time for remedying any inconsistent features.
References
Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2010). Project-oriented leadership. Farnham, Surrey [England: Gower.
