Recent orders
Practising Strategy Term Paper
Practising Strategy Term Paper
I. Assessment Introduction
The summative assessment for Practising Strategy consists of a single submission totalling 3,000 words, comprising two parts:
• Part 1: Academic essay: Theory and practice of strategic management (1,500 words). This section invites you to demonstrate a critical understanding and
application of the theory of strategic management, by means of analysis of a worked example or case study
• Part 2: Reflective essay: Reflections on your module learning process and the development of personal skills (1,500 words). This is a more reflective section
to this assessment, inviting you to reflect on your learning during the module and the development of both strategic management and personal skills. It is
anticipated that this will involve critical reflection on your own and others’ participation in the module, the simulation game, and how this has contributed to
the development of strategic management and personal skills, which might include, for example, critical reading, critical thinking, academic writing, political
awareness, etc.
>>>>>
II. Assessment Instructions
– Part 1: Academic Essay: Theory and practice of strategic management (1,500 words)
In this first section of this assessment, you are invited to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the theory, models and discourse of strategic
management, in relation to the theory and practice of corporate governance, organisational ethics and corporate social responsibility.
You are invited to critically consider an organisational situation as a worked example or case study, in terms of either a critique of recent or current strategic
management planning and activity. This might involve analysis of current or past personal experience of an organisational context, or any other public,
private or third-sector organisation of which you have sufficient knowledge or can research in order to conduct rigorous analysis.
Your analysis might comprise a critical consideration of a historical emergence of organisational strategy, critical appraisal of a declared current
organisational position, and/or critical analysis of strategic options available to the organisation, by means of a thoughtful application and analysis of theory
and selected models of strategic management.
This analysis will comprise engagement with one or more of either of the three foundational Schools of strategic management and recent alternative
theories or approaches covered within the Module. Your analysis should comprise a clear, well-argued and critical explanation as to why you have selected
this theory or theories over other areas of investigation and an analytical argument presenting their advantages and limitations. Analysis may extend to a
critical deliberation of the strategic options available to the organisation, perhaps carefully considered from wider and alternative theoretical perspectives.
Furthermore, you may wish to also consider your own understanding of theory and what the limitations of your choices and decisions might be.
Your analysis should include at least one of the broader strategic management concerns of the modern era covered within the Module, such as corporate
governance, ethical governance of organisations and/or corporate social responsibility. Select at least one of these issues and again explore the theoretical
implications of your choice. What does your choice here tell you about the wider implications of strategic management decisions, particularly in relation to
your practical case study? How might your organisational case be re-appraised from an alternative strategic management approach such as corporate
governance or corporate social responsibility perspectives? What conclusions can you draw from such analysis, if any? You are invited here to critically
consider your approach and the limitations of the theoretical ideas you apply.
Critical consideration of theory in relation to practice, involving for example, wider social and political notions of rhetoric of strategy, strategy as practice,
discourses of strategic management and governance as mechanisms of control, might also be particularly interesting within this context.
– Part 2: Reflective Essay: Reflections on your module learning process and the development of personal skills (1,500 words)
In this section, you are invited to critically reflect on your participation in the module, the learning process – specifically including participation in the
simulation game, the development of both strategic management and personal skills, including critical reading and thinking, academic writing, and personal
and political awareness in relation to the relationship between strategic management theory and practice and your own personal assumptions, values and
beliefs.
Within this section, you should particularly reflect on your use of strategic management theory in relation to the simulation game. Focus on one or more of
the suggested approaches to the game and consider how you have applied theory to practice and drawn insights into the difference between strategic
management theory and practice. What are the limitations of your knowledge, what are the limitations of the game, and what could you do to improve this?
You should also reflect on your discussions of the game with your fellow learners. Did you disagree with the interpretations of other learners?
You are additionally invited to apply a similarly reflective approach to your analysis of the organisational case within Part 1 of this assessment. How has
engagement with this module, the simulation game and analysis of the case study (in Part 1 above) developed your strategic management thinking and
practical skills? How might you define and describe these skills? In what way/s have you developed them? What have you gained, if anything, from the
learning process? If little has been gained, what might you do differently in the future to maximize the benefit derived from your participation in this Course?
Finally, you are invited to reflect on how you might apply your developing skills in practice in the future, in terms of your current role, a future role in
management, or any other future career you are interested in.
Overall however, you should discuss what you are taking away from this module as a learner and how you anticipate it might benefit, impact or otherwise
influence your future career.
>>>>
III. Marking Criteria
Module specific learning outcomes
The module learning outcomes for this module are as follows:
MLO 1. Demonstrate your knowledge of the main theoretical approaches to contemporary strategic management and understand the historical contexts that
gave rise to their formulation;
MLO 2. Integrate theory and technique in the analysis of strategic options available to private, public, and third-sector organisations;
MLO 3. Understand a wide range of perspectives on corporate social responsibility and ethics in management, and critically evaluate their practical
application in a variety of contexts;
MLO 4. Reflect on the development of your use of strategy in relation to your ongoing career as a manager.
This assessment addresses all the module learning outcomes listed above.
Generic assessment marking criteria
You will be marked according to six criteria:
• Quality of presentation
Evaluation of a health information system
Evaluation of a health information system: National Survey on Drug Use and Health
Evaluation of a Health Information System: National Survey on Drug Use and Health
NSDUH data is available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/behavioral-health-barometer-state-barometers-volume-6. The purpose of this assignment is not to perform a data analysis or examine the data in a granular manner, but rather evaluate this system / survey using the below criteria. focusing on
function, purpose and methodologies.. There is information about the survey available throughout the NSDUH website and in the attached report.
– Choose a single disease/condition to evaluate, even if the health information system includes more diseases or conditions.
– Choose a single site, such as a single country, state or local health department.
– Follow the attached outline, which can be used as framework for the paper.
A. Purpose/goals of the system;
B. A brief descriiption of your methods/process (whom you communicated with, where you obtained materials for review, etc.);
C. A descriiption of the system (include a flowchart in an annex);…
Vietnam War was a civil war among two halves of Vietnam
Vietnam War was a civil war among two halves of Vietnam
“Some people say the Vietnam War was a civil war among two halves of Vietnam. Others argue that it was an anti-US imperialism struggle on the part of the Vietnamese
revolutionaries. Yet some suggest that it was an anti-communism campaign going badly. Using primary and secondary sources, both provided in this class and from your own research, and based on what you’ve learned about the context of the war, what interpretation do you support? Choose one of the three options (Civil war, anti-US imperialism struggle or anti-communism campaign).
Requirements:
– Length: 5 pages (see writing format below)
– Use both primary sources (a memo, a report, a story… published/released *in the past*) and secondary sources (contemporary articles/books analyzing primary sources). For example, Diem’s conversation with Cabot Lodge in 1963 or George Kennan’s assessment of the Vietnam conflict in 1967 are
considered “primary sources,” whereas Logevall’s chapter on LBJ’s decision to escalate the Vietnam War in 1965 or Hammond’s chapter on how the media contributed to the chaos after Tet are “secondary sources.”
Note that Wikipedia and History.com are not considered reliable sources for this kind of assignment, although they are a good first point of reference.
– Cite your sources. Since this paper is not a memo, nor an oped, you can cite using footnotes or in-text citations.
Writing format:
• Typed, Single spaced with 1” margins; 12-point Times New Roman font; left justified.
• No added space between paragraphs.
• Cite your sources. If you are unsure about how to not commit plagiarism, please check out the links provided in the syllabus (under Honor Code).
All articles needed are attached. Only one outside source may be used and use at LEAST 2-3 articles attached. Please be sure to use the article(s) by Dixon and or George Kennan.
