Recent orders
Security and Risk Management Research Methods Critique of an article
Security and Risk Management Research Methods Critique of an article
2500 words excluding the bibliography.
Provide an academic critique of the following article:
Albrechtsen, E. (2007) ‘A qualitative study of users’ view on information security’, Computers & Security, 26(4), pp. 276-289
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
· You should use the above to help you consider what you need to address in your critique of the journal article.
· The paper MUST BE 2500 words (excluding subheadings and bibliography)
· Throughout the essay state your informed opinion about the clarity, relevancy, and accuracy of the article, using specific examples (quotes) from the article
to support your statements.
· Ensure that the essay does not contain colloquial language.
· Do not critique the statistical tests used in the study.
General Instructions –
Please ensure that you read this article carefully and provide a critique of what you read, based on your understanding of the research (see the REFERENCE
LIST FOR ESSAY for the material I have been reading to be used to support this essay).
Please ensure that you write this essay in a blanched approach providing a ‘critique’ of the weaknesses and an assessment and evaluation of the
methodological strengths and weaknesses as well as the impact of these for its validity.
Please can you also include in-text “direct quotes” (author, name, pp.00) to support the paper?
Please use the following STRUCTURE and please use the subheadings ensuring that there is a flow between each section –
What is the research focus,
Provide a review of the literature,
What are the research methods,
What are the findings (I have provided an example of an assignment which you can see for point of reference)
Writing Lab Report Assignment
Writing Lab Report Assignment
Lab Report Practical Instructions
November 2022
This document contains the instructions on how to use data, analyse and write-up your
lab report for the Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology module (PY5622).
Brief outline:
▪ For this assignment you will investigate sex differences* in optimism, from data
collected using a published questionnaire and for which a hypothesis will be required.
▪ You will additionally determine whether optimism and age are related, i.e., correlated.
A hypothesis will be required.
▪ You will prepare a lab report summarising your findings, the format of which will mirror
the format of a standard journal article. Please read though the sections below that
outline the requirements and steps involved.
The questionnaire:
Please read though the Optimism Questionnaire document (a pdf file). This provides
you with the revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R: Scheier et al., 1994) (administer the
first page) together with background information, links to additional articles, and
information on how the questionnaire is scored (second page). Your first task will be
to contact a fellow student (e.g. by Zoom/Skype) and administer the questionnaire,
that is, ask them each of the questions in turn and record their responses. You will find
details of who you are paired with in Groups under the People menu link.
Data analysis:
Once available, you will be notified of the group data that can be downloaded. If you
view it in Excel you will see it has three columns: these are for, left to right, the
variables sex, age (years) and Optimism. Import the data into Jamovi. Run the required
analyses – for this remember your research questions:
1. is there a significant difference in optimism scores for males and females*?
2. is optimism significantly related to age in years?
For the first, you will need to use a t-test; you will need to decide which type of ttest. For the second you will need to use a Pearson’s correlation.
* you will see that for this assignment we have asked you to investigate sex
differences, and later referred to males and females. We appreciate that this is the
old-fashioned convention of male versus female and apologise to anybody who feel
they do not fit within these categories. But for the purpose of the analysis here, we
need to have twoclear groups. In addition, prior research tends to talk in terms of
male versus female, with little as yet published acknowledging a greater range of
gender identities.
Writing the report
The word limit is 1400 words. This excludes: the title page, the abstract and
references section (and any figures and accompanying captions). Note the word count
is a maximum limit (reading/marking stops at it).
Report Structure
Please include the following sections and sub-sections in the same order as stated
below (stated in italics, although do not use italics in your report). See also the Week
4 pdf summary document for further details. You should also refer to the slides and
recording from the writing your report live session.
Title Page
Please include a title page, this must include: The report title, word count (net) and
your student ID.
Abstract
This is a short summary of the entire study. Start with the aim and summarise with
your final conclusion.
Introduction
This section should include the aims and hypotheses of your study and cite the most
relevant journal articles to the research question, e.g., what has been done before?
The aim is to give the reader some background information on the topic under
investigation. It moves from the general to the specific topically. By the end of your
evaluation of the current knowledge and theory, it should be obvious what you are
going to examine. End with your hypotheses (alternative and null).
Method
This will contain the following sub-sections in the order given:
Participants
• How many, age (mean, standard deviation, and range), males and females
(number and potentially split of age across groups), why participating, any
criteria…
Design
• Underlying design method (e.g. experiment, or survey etc.), more specific
design (e.g. between/within participants, attitude scale etc.)
• Variables (independent, dependent – the measures, or just variables measured
in situ, as they occur)
Materials
• All stimuli and documentation (instructions, scales, consent forms etc.)
• Reliability and validity of scales used, scoring (although might go in design) etc.
Procedure
• What the participants did – usual to put ethical comments here (for the purposes
of your report you can assume that ethical approval was granted from the
University, and that participants were informed of their rights and signed a
consent form, etc.)
Results
Present your data first: descriptive statistics and then include the outcome of your
statistical analyses (as outlined above), e.g., t-test: t (32) = -4.23, p< .05 (2-tailed)
and correlation: r (120) = 0.32, p < .001. All reported statistics should be given in
American Psychological Association (APA) format.
An appropriate graphical visualisation of numeric data should be included for any/all
significant findings (e.g., a bar chart or box plot showing male and females scores
and/or a scatter plot of correlation data). You are also required to include within your
report a table – you can either do so to present your participant details instead of doing
so in narrative, or your descriptive statistics instead of doing so in narrative, and/or
your four hypotheses (two research and two null). Do not copy output tables from
Jamovi into your report.
Discussion
Start with an overview of your findings in general terms and in general terms whether
or not they supported your research hypotheses. Present your interpretation of the
findings relative to prevailing research theory (which should have been raised in the
introduction) and prior research evidence (which should have been discussed in the
introduction). Discuss the strengths and weakness of your study, for example, does the
age range of your participants allow you to draw a conclusion over a limited range of
ages only? Mention any future directions of the research, for example, what could you
do as a follow up study. Do be balanced when you talk about the study – consider what
it can tell you as well as what it does not, and in terms of what it does not this should
lead you into a sentence about what you could do next to address this.
Conclusion
End with a final conclusion. This should be no more than a couple of sentences saying
what you have learned from the study.
References
You will have referred to other studies, for example, in your Introduction, please cite
all of these references in this final section. Failure to acknowledge the work or the
ideas of others amounts to plagiarism, which is a very serious academic offence. The
required format for referencing in Psychology is the format adopted by the American
Psychological Association (APA version 7).
Scheier M., Carver C., & Bridges M. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait
anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063-1078.
There is no requirement for any additional sections, appendix, supplementary
material, etc. for this submission.
Formatting Requirements
An overall aim is to make your report easy to read by the marker. The following five
points will assist with this:
1. Main text – use font size: 12pt (title and sub-section titles can be larger and in
bold, but do distinguish between different levels of headings).
2. Font type: Your choice – but please ensure it is a clearly legible type, e.g., Arial,
Calibri, Times New Roman OR similar.
3. Line spacing: 1.5 spaced.
4. Include a title page (with title, net word count, and your student ID).
5. When figures are used label them Figure 1, etc, refer to them in the text as, for
example, “Figure 1” and ensure they have a suitable caption. Similarly, Table 1 in text
and the caption – APA formatting required.
6.
Key theories underpinning DBT behaviourism mindfulness and dialectics
Key theories underpinning DBT behaviourism mindfulness and dialectics
QUESTION
Briefly describe the three theoretical foundations of DBT. How do these theories uniquely address the problems of borderline personality disorder?
You then apply all 3 theories to the diagnostic criteria for borderline personality- see below.
Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria for Diagnosis (verywellmind.com)
It’s a 3000-word essay- so wording will need to be carefully looked at- e.g. wording for introduction, conclusion, etc, references in the essay is counted as the word count. Bibliography is not included as part of the word count.
You could probably do 800 words per each theory – but apply each theory to the diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder.
Then use 100 words for the introduction/ 100 words for the bibliography.
Please do ask me any questions if you have any/ please also use the recommended reading list I have given you. If you need access to these books. You will need to download digital editions and then I will explain how you can download the e books. You may need access to my library information- for you to download the books to digital editions to get the e books, or alternatively if you have another source to get these books then please do that, however this is my required reading list therefore these books will need to be the ones which need to be used.
You also need to use the APA referencing guide for the essay therefore I will send you the criteria for this and how references should be done.
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this module you should be able to:
1. Critically evaluate the importance of the key theories underpinning DBT (behaviourism, mindfulness, and dialectics).
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the application of the main treatment strategies stemming from these theories in clinical practice.
Essay addressing the theoretical foundations of the treatment (3000 words) (Learning Outcome 1)
Marking Criteria for Essays Module
PHP4200/PHP4333 Assignment 1
• • Writing guidelines for essays are outlined in the online postgraduate taught handbook. These should be closely followed.
• • Word limits are on Blackboard
• • Essays should have a clear structure and line of argument and should be free of grammatical, spelling and typographical errors.
• • APA guidelines for referencing should be followed
• • Care should be taken to ensure that plagiarism is avoided, as the penalties are severe. Further information is available in the handbook
Content
• • The essay question should be explicitly answered
• • All content should be obviously relevant to the essay question
• • All essays require candidates to demonstrate understanding of the main theoretical components of the treatment
• • An understanding of the application of the theories to clinical practice should be evident in the answer. These should be described in general, principle- based ways rather than as mini-case studies or as personalised reports of clinical activity.
A (70%+)
Essays at this level are of an extremely high standard exceeding that expected by the candidate. The student demonstrates an extremely thorough and comprehensive understanding of the theoretical components of the treatment and how they relate to clinical practice. The essay has excellent structure, a clear line of argument and no spelling or grammatical errors.
B (60-70%)
Essays at this level are highly competent demonstrating a good understanding of the theoretical aspects of the treatment and their application in clinical practice. The essay question is explicitly answered and has a coherent structure and line of argument that is adhered to throughout and shows a relationship between successive parts allowing for ease of comprehension
C (50-60%)
The essay is well organised and structured demonstrating reasonably comprehensive coverage. The candidate demonstrates understanding of the relationship between theory and practice within the treatment.
Fail (<50%)
The work does not meet the required standard for post-graduate study. Content omissions go beyond what constitutes minor corrections. Limited understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of the treatment and how they relate to clinical practice are demonstrated.
Where I can find the guidance for text size and spacing?
There is no specific guidance on text size and spacing, please just follow the other style guidance related to the APA format.
What makes a good essay?
A “good” essay will have an introductory paragraph that briefly introduces the information to be discussed in the essay and the structure. Throughout the essay, full paragraphs should be used meaning each paragraph should have a topic sentence and a number of information points to support your topic sentence. Each separate idea should have its own paragraph. At this level of academic work, it is generally most effective to paraphrase readings, rather than quote directly. Each paraphrased idea needs to be properly referenced using APA style. At the end of the essay, you will want to have a conclusion that briefly summarises the points you made throughout the essay. In addition, you will need to include a bibliography.
