Recent orders
All Extra Credit
Extra Credit Question Instructions
Extra Credit Question InstructionsAll Extra Credit Question Essays must be submitted on Tuesday, Nov. 29th (that is the only day submissions will be accepted). Your essay must be submitted Tuesday between 12:00 noon and 9:00 PM. In each of the seven groups you will see a new folder at the top of your group forum space entitled “Extra Credit Essay submission,” and that is where you will submit your Extra Credit Essays by 9:00 PM Tuesday November 29th. (Remember this is NOT required, this is totally voluntary). Your essay if submitted must conform to the guidelines given as to required formatting and required content (i.e., you must provide answers and/or serious discussion to the first 3 of the 5 items in the Extra Credit Forum Essay Instructions, and the best essays will also deal with at least one of the other 2 as well.
Please note that your Extra Credit Essay must deal with both these 3 short clips from Dr. David Martin on the Plandemic Two video (Source 1, listed in the following forum with the Extra Credit Question itself):)
Plandemic Clip 03: Patents on the Coronavirus beginning in 1999. 7 minutes, 14 seconds
Plandemic Clip 04: Where did the Coronavirus originate and how has the media spread it. 3 minutes, 39 seconds
Plandemic Clip 012: Who is Bill Gates and what eruption has he caused? 6 minutes, 04 seconds
and have at least two citations, discussed with page number(s) [not from the same page] from Chapter 1 “Mismanaging a Pandemic,” in Robert F. Kennedy’s book The Real Anthony Fauci (Source 2). I am not giving any hard and fast rules for this, but your essay must treat both of them in some depth to get credit; even if your essay is in great depth on Robert Kennedy’s chapter, you must also include some specific discussion and insight from the three Dr. David Martin, Pandemic Two video clips listed, and same in reverse There are some other sources listed, treatment of them is completely optional but it is well worth taking a quick look at them, for your own health.
Formatting Requirements for the Extra Credit Essay Question
Here are the formatting requirements for your Essay. Points 1. through 3. are required, Points 4. and 5. are suggested but not required – if these requirements are met, submission of an essay in this forum will earn you eight extra credit points:
All paragraphs MUST be at least EIGHT sentences each in length (can be longer, can have additional paragraphs; this length is minimum and quite acceptable requirement. There must be at least one blank and empty line between paragraphs, and font Arial size 18 is required. (Formatting rules from course website.) With three paragraphs meeting all of these standards, you will earn 6 Extra Credit Points. With four or more paragraphs meeting all the standards, you will earn 8 Extra Credit Points
You must list and discuss two or more specific points you learned from the video clip (Dr. David Martin) and from the reading (Robert F. Kennedy Jr., here citations with page number are required) that are relevant to the present health crisis around the COVID-19 virus, and then discuss each in enough depth that it is clear to me you have really listened and thought about them.
What specific institutions and power structures might be threatened by the information presented in this video or reading?
What are your views on the censorship of this and other health-related questions? Is the First Amendment relevant in this connection?
Can you connect the work you discuss, and any of these points in the preceding (2.) or (3.) to themes or readings in our course?
All assignments must be submitted as word documents (not PDF, pages, etc.), must be submitted in their respective folder on M
All assignments must be submitted as word documents (not PDF, pages, etc.), must be submitted in their respective folder on Moodle, and must be in 12-pt font.
Instructions: Based on the content covered in the book chapters and lectures, briefly respond to the following questions and statements.
Pick a job position that you would potentially do a job analysis on and state the position.
Go to the O*NET website and search for the job position, copy and paste a brief job description here.
What job analysis method would you use to conduct your job analysis (Refer to chapter and or lecture slides)? Provide a brief summary of what your chosen job analysis method would be composed of.
What job analysis technique would you use (Refer to chapter and or lecture slides)? No need to go into the details of the technique. Provide a brief summary of what your chosen job analysis technique would be composed of.
Hamlet Act 3 Scene 1 “To Be Or Not To Be” to live or die.
Student’s Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Hamlet Act 3 Scene 1: “To Be Or Not To Be” “to live or die.”
To die — to dream, //No more; and to sleep, to state that we have ended “(Shakespeare3.1.57-62). William Shakespeare is well regarded as the father of English and literature, renowned for numerous quotations such as the following. Hamlet is attempting to challenge mortality in the classic soliloquy. Previously, Hamlet blames God for making suicide a human choice; this reveals how traumatizing his father’s death was and how much impact it had on him. Hamlet comes to know that suicide is a sin and a shame to God that causes him to associate death with deep sleep. And as the notion of deep sleep continues to appeal to him, so he begins to wonder about his dreams. “To sleep: the chance to dream:—there is the rub; /For in the sleep of death, what dreams can come” (3.1.68-69).
This dreams are being linked to that of the afterlife. The “dreams” that he fears will happen in the afterlife, the pain, and the hardship that he will face, and there is no certainty of what is about to come. As the opening line states, “To be or not to be” is based on nuanced notions of life and death (and afterlife). Until this point in the play, Hamlet argues with himself whether to kill Claudius to avenge his father. He also wonders if it would be preferable to kill himself — that would allow him to withdraw from his own “sea of trouble” and the “slings and arrows” of life.
Yet, like so many others, Hamlet hates the confusion that death entails and is tormented by the thought of ending up in Hell — a place far more horrible than living. He is deeply plagued by this realization that the only way to figure out if death is better than life is to go ahead and finish it, a lifelong step that cannot be taken. Despite Hamlet’s efforts to scientifically comprehend the world and death, there are certain things he can never realize before he dies, fueling his ambivalence.
“No, I didn’t. I never gave you anything “(act 3.1.99). This quote from the soliloquy of Hamlet indicates that his depressive way of thinking influences his relationship with others. Hamlet is regarded not on his right mind because he is highly suicide-like and has only just learned that his uncle may have murdered his father. The fact that he appears to have never given Ophelia a gift and insults him when she tries to provide him with an explanation.
Shakespeare uses many metaphors by far; it is an essential literary tool in the soliloquy. An analogy is when a thing, person, place, or thought is contrasted with another, usually to create a poetic or rhetorical effect in non-literal terms. The first metaphor is “to take up arms against a sea of distress,” in which this “sea of disturbance,” especially Hamlets’ own striving to seek vengeance, constitutes the agony of life. The trouble of Hamlet is so numerous and almost infinite that it reminds of a vast water body. Another metaphor that comes later on in the Solid is the following: “The undiscovered land, from whose bourn no voyager is returning.” Here, Hamlet contrasts the afterlife, or what happens after death, with an “Undiscovered Country,” from which no one returns. This metaphor clarifies that death is permanent, and nobody knows anything that comes in the afterlife.
Repetition and direction are rhetorical instruments in Hamlet’s soliloquy to further the process. These devices affect the overall effect by adding a contemplative tone to the plot. Another example will be Hamlet repeating the “to die and to sleep” line in that speech (Acts 3,1.61,65). Another rhetorical example is that when Hamlet says: “No traveler returns puzzles of the will and causes us to bear rather those misfortunes than the ones we have that we don’t know about? “(3.1. 81-83 act). This is an example of how the play is directed. These rhetorical devices assist Hamlet since they stress whether or not he commits suicide.
In conclusion, Hamlet was critical in his plot creation in Soliloquy Act 3 scene 1, “To be or not to be,” because it was at the moment when he was worst, and the suicidal view made us reproach the character who would have to choose to destroy or live with another perspective. He doesn’t have to look over his uncle’s empire now, which he thinks he and his father should have. He’s no longer obliged to avenge the death of his father. Furthermore, Claudius and Gertrude’s acts he feels are incestuous can never again be watched. Hamlet addresses the excruciating and wretched nature of human life and the preference for death (specifical suicide) for not the terrible confusion about what happens after death ADDIN CSL_CITATION {“citationItems”:[{“id”:”ITEM-1″,”itemData”:{“URL”:”http://shakespeare-online.com/plays/hamlet/soliloquies/tobeornottobe.html”,”abstract”:”Hamlet’s Soliloquy: To be, or not to be: that is the question (3.1)”,”accessed”:{“date-parts”:[[“2020″,”11″,”7″]]},”author”:[{“dropping-particle”:””,”family”:”Mabillard”,”given”:”Amanda”,”non-dropping-particle”:””,”parse-names”:false,”suffix”:””}],”container-title”:”http://www.shakespeare-online.com”,”id”:”ITEM-1″,”issued”:{“date-parts”:[[“2018″]]},”title”:”Hamlet’s Soliloquies: To be, or not to be”,”type”:”webpage”},”uris”:[“http://www.mendeley.com/documents/?uuid=d659d796-e997-3a56-a164-4c1d8183dcec”]}],”mendeley”:{“formattedCitation”:”(Mabillard)”,”plainTextFormattedCitation”:”(Mabillard)”,”previouslyFormattedCitation”:”(Mabillard)”},”properties”:{“noteIndex”:0},”schema”:”https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json”}(Mabillard).
Work Cited
ADDIN Mendeley Bibliography CSL_BIBLIOGRAPHY Mabillard, Amanda. “Hamlet’s Soliloquies: To Be, or Not to Be.” Http://Www.Shakespeare-Online.Com, 2018, http://shakespeare-online.com/plays/hamlet/soliloquies/tobeornottobe.html.
