Professional Chartered Membership Portfolio

Professional Chartered Membership Portfolio

Professional portfolio is vital for many reasons. Place your order, an get help on how to development a perfect Professional Chartered Membership Portfolio. Thank you!

Respiratory Physiology

Respiratory Physiology

Get a paper on any topic concerning Respiratory Physiology

  • APA style
  • 10-15 Pages
  • 20 sources
  • Original paper
  • 24/7 support
  • advanced English

Climate change as portrayed in the media

Climate change as portrayed in the media

Curriculum Development

Curriculum Development

Now that you have built your logic model and know the overarching structure for your program, it is time to
begin developing curriculum that will help your audience reach the outcomes you have set.
– Create a curriculum for a session in your program that fits into your logic model and contributes to reaching
your desired outcome(s)
– Curriculum must be at least 45 minutes in length
– Be sure to include your program goal, learning objectives, and learning outcomes
– Ensure you include every aspect of the WHERE model in your curriculum
– Break down each activity, discussion, debrief, talking point, etc.
– Be sure to include your timing for each component so you know you will stay on time
– Note if the session is in-person or virtual
– Utilize the examples provided for guidance if needed

Social Psychology Experiment

Social Psychology Experiment

5 Pages

3 sources

 

 

Climate Change Philosophy https://assignmentstutors.com/

Climate Change Philosophy https://assignmentstutors.com/

**Hi Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this assignment. instructions are below and I will
attach the reading.
Thanks, Sam**
Short Writing Assignment Details
Overview: This assignment gives you an opportunity to practice close and careful engagement and analysis
with a philosophical text. Choose a single reading as your focus, and then focus on a particular claim or
argument in this reading that you think is important or central to the piece.
Tasks: After choosing a claim or argument, your paper must accomplish three tasks. It may be helpful to
organize your paper in separate sections following these three tasks, or you may choose to mix them together.
(1) Explain in your own words a clear and accurate description of the claim showing an understanding of what
the author is saying, why they are saying it, how they support it and how it fits in the context of their piece
overall.

(2) Evaluate this claim using your own critical thinking. Is its logic sound? Why or why not? Has the author left
out relevant information or considerations? Do you find the argument convincing? Why or why not? Why is this
claim important or problematic?
(3) Reflect on the implications your evaluation. There are many different ways to reflect. You might consider
any of the following: What questions does it raise? How does it make you feel and why? What lesson might
you draw from your analysis?
Thesis: It is essential is that the paper has a thesis that ties all three tasks together. You can think of the thesis
as the main result or conclusion that you wish to emphasize regarding the results of your analysis. The thesis
will order your entire paper. You should understand how everything you say in the paper is in some way
necessary to support its thesis. If you have questions about this, you should watch the short video on Finding a
Thesis on OWL. You may also bring questions to me during this process.
Mechanics: Papers should be from 3-5 pages (roughly 1000 – 1300 words). They should be 12 pt. font and
double-spaced with standard one inch margins. For citation, include the author name and page number in
parentheses. Full bibliographical information following MLA style should be included in a Works Cited section
at the end. (For information about MLA style, see: https://style.mla.org/.)
Title pages are not necessary. The assignment is not a research paper. No additional sources beyond the
assigned text are required. I don’t recommend using additional sources, but if you do, be sure to appropriately
cite them in the bibliography. Please be aware that copying material from an online source or article is
plagiarism. Plagiarism on an assignment will result in an automatic zero.
Assessment Rubric: Papers will receive a number grade based on the following rubric (20 points per category):
Thesis: Is there a clearly presented thesis that effectively organizes the argument of the paper?
Clarity and Writing Mechanics: Are sentences clear and grammatically correct? Is the paper well organized?
Do you build effective transitions between ideas in a way that develops a coherent over-all thesis? Does the
paper follow an appropriate and consistent citation style? Do you use citations in an effective way to support
your claims?
Accuracy: Have you adequately and accurately explained the text’s argument? Do you use citations in an
effective and accurate way to support your description?
Coherence: Does your argument make sense as a reasonable response to the topic in question? Does it follow
a logical form in providing support and evidence? Is the argument plausible?
Depth of reflection: Do you consider possible criticisms or counter-arguments? How well do you develop the
implications of the view you are responding to?

Additional Tips:
1. Be careful about being overly broad. Philosophical thought improves if we are able to be as precise and
specific as possible. For this reason, stay grounded in the text.
2. Budget your time. Do not wait to write your paper in one sitting at the last minute. Ideally, you should
complete a draft, spend some time away from it, and come back to re-read, revise, and polish.

3. Proofread! Excessive typographical, spelling, or grammatical errors will detract from your grade.
4. Put things in your own words. Do not use lengthy citations to present a complicated idea; rather, summarize
the idea in your own language and use brief citations as support and evidence.
5. Make sure that your paper has a thesis and do not be afraid to adjust or clarify this thesis in the course of
writing your paper.
6. Be self-critical. Consider what someone might say who does not agree with you. Try to anticipate objections
and include them in your paper, and then respond to them.

Safety climate and increased risk The role of deadlines in design work

Safety climate and increased risk  The role of deadlines in design work

Please write a summary of the article attached (“Safety climate and increased risk: The role of deadlines in
design work”). Include your thoughts and reflections.

 

Labor Movement – Write My Essay

Labor Movement – Write My Essay

Pick an industry (any industry you’re a part of or interested in). Example: Fast Food, Education, Amazon, etc.
Research its history of labor disputes and unionization. (This will probably not be on the company website, but
should be in newspapers mostly available on line) and write 1 page about the issues surrounding worker’s
rights in that industry. Cite your sources.

Nursing Education Teaching Plan

Nursing Education Teaching Plan

Will include template and instructions below.
You are to pick a topic and make a one page teaching plan for it.
Sources

Moral-Example Theory Moral Influence Theory

Moral-Example Theory Moral Influence Theory

REL 301 Christian Theology
Final Exam
Due: February 9, 2021 at 9:30 pm
Note: Papers should have the following format:
• 12-point standard font
• Name, date, course, and Final Exam at the top of the page
• Three-to-Four pages of content (minimum—you may write more)
• Line-spacing: Double-spaced
• One-inch margins

Select one of the following theories of atonement that most closely resembles your experience of what
happens through the death and resurrection of Jesus that “saves” us. If you are not a believer, find someone
who is a believer, listen to their story, and then decide which theory of atonement best describes their
experience. If you are using another person’s story, you will write the part about personal experience from their
perspective.
Note: The theories of atonement listed below may differ slightly from the corresponding theories in the
textbook; however, please select from one of the theories on this list. You may use material from the textbook
where the theories correspond to each other. There are also theories listed here that are NOT in the textbook.
Where possible, links have been included for further research.
Once you have selected the theory of atonement on which you will write, provide the following information:
1. Define or describe your chosen theory of atonement in your own words. Be specific about what “happens” to
the believer that brings about salvation. In other words, what is the catalyst that takes place that results in a
believer being saved? Another way to think about this question is determining what Jesus accomplishes on our
behalf. (10 points)
2. Describe any historic background (Names, Dates, Councils, or Church Traditions, if any) or scriptures that
point to this theory. In other words, put it in context and let me know from where this theory came. (5 points)
3. Using your personal testimony (or the testimony of someone you know), describe how you experienced the
gift of salvation through this particular view of the atonement. (5 points)
4. What difference does salvation through this in this manner have on how the believer lives? (5 points)
Note: Be sure to provide responses to each of the four items above!
Selected Theory:
• The Moral-Example Theory (or Moral-Influence Theory): Christ died to influence mankind toward moral
improvement. This theory denies that Christ died to satisfy any principle of divine justice, but teaches instead
that His death was designed to greatly impress mankind with a sense of God’s love, resulting in softening their
hearts and leading them to repentance. Thus, the Atonement is not directed towards God with the purpose of
maintaining His justice, but towards man with the purpose of persuading him to right action. Formulated by
Peter Abelard (1079-1142) partially in reaction against Anselm’s Satisfaction theory, this view was held by the
16th century Socinians. Versions of it can be found later in F. D. E. Schleiermacher (1768-1834) and Horace
Bushnell (1802-1876).
Course Textbook:
Jones, Beth Felker. Practicing Christian Doctrine: An Introduction to Thinking and Living Theologically. Grand
Rapids: Baker Academic, 2014. ISBN: 978-0-8010-4933-0